The Clinton Rape Allegations

Coastalrat writes:

Quote:

Ah well, as long as you are consistent regardless of the person or situation. Makes me think about an incident last night. Went with my wife to the grocery store. When we checked out, there were 2 packets of kool-aid in the cart. She accused me of putting them there. I didn't, so I denied it. But the entire trip home, she kept asking me to come clean and kept saying I had put them in the cart because she did not. Well, I know I did not, so I kept denying it. Had I just shut up and said nothing, she would be left with the opinion that I had done it. Good thing it was not you in the car or you would have believed I was guilty because of my denials

The question that comes immediately to mind, are you a Kool-ade junkie CR? Are you in the habit of spiking the grocery order with Kool-ade? If so, your denials in this one incident could quite justifiably be questioned. If not, you will likely be believed.

Now considering the fomer president's denials......need I say more?

I posted on another link referencing the tendency of the Clinton supporters to trash the women he was involved with along with the suggestion that it was their moral failing, not his.

How well do you think a GOP supporter could get away with an argument like that?

Coastal it's just annoying to me that these girls are pictured as victims....foxfyres comments aside.....I've had a couple of virgins in my life and I prefer a woman who knows her way around a...well, you know, so no judgements here.

The overwhelming weight of evidence is that Slick is a serial rapist who was allowed to serve out his second term for purely political reasons, i.e. ecause nobody could stomach the idea of turning the presidency over to Al Gore at the time.

Ken Starr clearly figured that the perjury case against Slick for lying to a federal grand jury was the simplest and easiest to prosecute of all Slick's various crimes and he was basically correct.

Jerome Zeifman, the chief council for the house judiciary committee at the time of Watergate and the man most responsible for getting rid of Nixon, noted that he would impeach Clinton for three obvious cases of bribery, i.e.

swolf wrote:

Jerome Zeifman, the chief council for the house judiciary committee at the time of Watergate and the man most responsible for getting rid of Nixon, noted that he would impeach Clinton for three obvious cases of bribery, i.e.

I don't give a rat's ass what Zeifman said he would or wouldn't do. My tax dollars paid $70 million for Ken Starr and his team to investigate all things Clinton and they exonerated Clinton on every allegation.

There's some nice men outside waiting for you, pal.

They've got a lovely white dinner jacket in your size (real stylish; it has ties in the back), and they're going to take you to the fanciest restaurant in town and let you order anything you like.

Don't keep them waiting. Run along.

This little girl's name was Milica Rakic. At three years of age when she died, hundreds of kilometers away from any legitimate military target in Serbia in 1999,

swolf wrote:

This little girl's name was Milica Rakic. At three years of age when she died, hundreds of kilometers away from any legitimate military target in Serbia in 1999,

Serbia, lol.

Slobodan Milosevic is a war criminal guilty of crimes against humanity, and on trial at The Hague for said war crimes.

Opponents of the court would like an ironclad guarantee that the court would never try an American. Absent such a commitment, they want to block creation of the court by pressing countries not to ratify the treaty. This position may prevail in the administration, although more moderate officials would prefer to see Washington simply renounce its own signature of the treaty. The House, for its part, recently passed a bill that would require America to cut off military aid to most countries that ratify the treaty, unless they pledge never to surrender an American to the court. The bill also authorizes Washington to use force to rescue Americans - even from the Netherlands, where the court will be based.

But (( claps )) for you openly admitting your support of a heinous war criminal. You must've forgotten the Republicans - with an adamant Bob Dole as their Senate Majority leader - fully supporting Clinton's actions in Bosnia, Kosovo, etc.

Btw, Swolfie...breaking news for you:

Cavic says war crimes were committed | 18:13 June 23 | FoNet

BANJALUKA -- Wednesday - Republic of Srpska President Dragan Cavic said today in a statement to the Commission for Incidents in Srebrenica that war crimes were committed by the Serbian military in Srebrenica in July of 1995.

"A German tank rolls through a small village, and the peasants rush out, lining the road with their right arm raised in Nazi salute as they chanted "Heil Hitler." Mobs chased minorities from their homes, kicking them, and pelting them with eggs as they flee into the woods. Europe in the 1942s? No Croatia in the 1990s." (The Washington Times, 15 June 1997) . From the Evening Standard of London, 7 August 1995, "Victory smiles that hide the roots of evil, Edward Pearce writes, "but you can understand Croatia best by saying flatly that if there is one place in the world where a statue of Adolf Hitler would be revered, it would be in Zagreb." And from the International Herald Tribune, 4 September 1995, "Croatia Eradicates Traces of its Serbs, Army Loots and Burns Krajina Homes."

With US military aid and technology and training by the Military Professional Resources, Inc., (MPRI) Croatian forces "ethnically cleansed" over 250,000 Serbs from their ancestral Krajina land (the largest exodus since WWII), slaughtered over 5,000, and those too elderly or infirm to flee remained only to have their throats slit or a bullet to the back of the head. Furthermore, Croatian jets bombed and strafed fleeing refugees without one word of condemnation from the "civilized" world.