We now know he wasn't just an innocent kid walking down the street. We know wasn't shot in the back as "witnesses" claim.
Did you miss the medical examination done by the 3rd party that was hired by the Brown family? His report states that no bullets hit him from behind.
Did I say he attacked the officer? No I didn't. I said his frame of mind after committing a crime could lead to him attacking the officer. He was an innocent person walking down the street. He had just committed a crime and I have a hard time believing you are just going to ignore that. I have said numerous times that we won't know for a while what happened. I still haven't made up my mind on this, as the story changes and the initial media reports have started to fall apart. Only time will tell.
What are you getting at Frank?
I have never claimed he was stopped due to the crime he had just committed. He knew he had committed a crime and within 10 minutes of said crime, a cop was asking to talk to him.
You mean the video taped robbery?
I already said he wasn't stopped due to the robbery. Did you miss that?
Word games by Frank. Enjoy playing your own game Frank. We all know what took place in the tape. You can clearly see him take something and when the owner tries to stop him, he is shoved around and then Brown leaves the store. Yes that video of a "supposed" robbery and I guess assault of the store clerk.
Talk about a lot of guess work to go out of your way to make it look like nothing happened. Don't pull something on this stretch of yours, you old guys don't heal so fast anymore.