giujohn wrote:Looters and arsonists should be shot on sight...anyone who is unruly or disruptive or who do not follow lawful orders of police should be arrested immediately. Any use of force should be met with overwhelming counter force. Video should be taken to identify agitators and instigators and charged with terroristic actions and incitement to riot.
If police violate the law they should be adjudicated by the rule of law.
Here we have someone claiming to be a cop proposing murder.
When police make comments about shooting black people on sight and then they are not held to account then no I don't trust the system.
Emergency powers of the governor do not grant police the power to shoot looters on sight.
So you are arguing that the governor can declare an emergency and order the police to shoot people because the governor feels they should be shot and that allows him to get around the US Constitution?
I do not believe that is how it went down, the pictures of Wilson do not show someone who was assaulted.
It was a mistake to rack the pistol (prematurely).
Thay shud have taught her that in the earliest grades of school.
You cant indict a cop without evidence and get away without a rebellion from cops. The state is between a rock and a hard place here, they need to indict to quiet the mobs, but without the police the state has no agents to control the mobs. Once the police no longer believe that the state bosses are on their side they will refuse to be the states blade.
The cops know how corrupt our justice system has become, but once that corrupt system goes after cops without a care for justice it is all over.
I am not going to go over the case, no matter how it went down, I can't see any justification for shooting an unarmed man six times. Period.
No matter how you slice it, six times is too excessive, there was no reason for it.
He must have been superman to be able to keep coming after someone after being shot so many times.
AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL THE DUMB ASSES WHO BOUGHT THE "HANDS UP, DONT SHOOT" LIE
It's called BROTHER COVER.
It is when a black person has an opportunity to give false testimony implicating ANY police officer in wrong doing when that officer, white or black is arresting any black person. It can be a total stranger or a friend of the criminal. The objective is to bold face lie in an effort to exonerate the black criminal AND put the police in a negative light by fabricating wrong doing.
It is a routine and accepted practice in the black community.
In the case of Michael Brown, his criminal mate, Johnson, automatically lied and set the stage for all the riots. His OBVIOUS lies were immediately taken up by those who understand the use of BROTHER COVER and believed by bleeding heart white liberal apologists who are too blind to see the truth.
The ridiculous justification is that there have been some police who have over stepped their authority, so lie about ALL black/police encounters to get even and perpetuate the victim scenario.
So to those who bought this perposterous lie (which has been dispelled by 7 black witnesses in grand jury) my question is: Do you feel like a dumb ass? If so...go with that feeling and remember it next time.