Thunderbolts of the gods

@farmerman,

Quote:

Quantum physics gave us the Laser, the transistor, high accuracy detectors for chem equipment and lots more

Nope, sir, quantum physic did not! That is my whole point sir.

Obviously you don't read, I have written it before here.
The transitor was NOT made possibly by 'modern physics' especially quantum physics. And so it is with the other things that are 'made possible' by
'modern science'! 'modern science' has nothing to do with it.

Oh and by the way, quantum physics is also a bundle of idiotic ideas that don't work.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

. .. . The transitor was NOT made possibly by 'modern physics' especially quantum physics. And so it is with the other things that are 'made possible' by 'modern science'! 'modern science' has nothing to do with it.

Then, please tell us by what confluence of celestial events did we come to have transistors and the like.

1 Reply

@neologist,

Quote:

Then, please tell us by what confluence of celestial events did we come to have transistors and the like.

lol, aliens and 'confluence of celestial events'? Gee, that has nothing to do with it offcourse. Wink

it is very simple. the 'transistor' (semi conductor) was invented long before 'quantum theory'. As were all those other things like radio, wireless, mri,
and what have you.

The very idiotic and myopic 'modern physics' really has brought us nothing at all!

0 Replies

The transistor was developed in 1947. The first quantum corrections to traditional mechanics were developed between 1900 and 1925. Magnetic resonance imaging was first described in a Phd thesis in 1952. This joker is incoherent. He makes statements from authority, and we have no reason to accept his authority, especially as he is almost always wrong. He also jumps around, talking first about physics, the Modern Science [sic], and then Modern Physics [sic]--so if you respond to one, he claims he was talking about the other.

You're wasting your time, FM.

2 Replies

@Setanta,

Quote:

The transistor was developed in 1947.

Nope, it was not. I wrote it was developed BEFORE quantum physics.

Most, if not all, textbooks have it wrong.

and I am still talking about 'modern physics' and have defined that.

2 Replies

@Setanta,

he should read about PN junctions and Walter Brattain. (A theorist who produced things on the "bench")

I know I waste time but I don't care for his self congratulatory style especially when its based on ignorance of facts .

1 Reply

@farmerman,

lol

Ignorance of facts? You people are very funny!

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quote:

I wrote it was developed BEFORE quantum physics.

Well , just cause you "Wrote it" doesn't validate it.
Youre flat wrong bubba.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

and you are really really sure I am wrong? Right?

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Fabulous furry one wrote:

The transistor was developed in 1947.

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Nope, it was not. I wrote it was developed BEFORE quantum physics.

Most, if not all, textbooks have it wrong.

Please! Oh, please! Enlighten us. Where, how, and by whom was the transistor developed?

3 Replies

@neologist,

maybe I was wrong? Wink

btw aren't you exaggerating? enlinghten?

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

I think I'll walk the dog now.

1 Reply

@neologist,

Hey, asshole, knock off the disobliging, sneering names. I don't do that to you. If you can't return the courtesy, then don't say a goddamned thing to me or about me. Capiche?

2 Replies

@Setanta,

talking to me?

0 Replies

@neologist,

maybe I wasn't lying after all Wink

Quote:

Lilienfield Acknowledged As Pioneer

In an address to the American Institute of Physics in 1988, Bardeen acknowledged the great credit due Lilienfeld for his pioneering efforts to make the semiconductor amplifier. In the 1920s, Lilienfeld could not have understood the physics of the field-effect semiconductor amplifier, as the quantum theory of solids was still several years away. Nevertheless, he had a good intuitive feel for a new approach to electronics. In Bardeen’s own words, “Lilienfeld had the basic concept of controlling the flow of current in a semiconductor to make an amplifying device. It took many years of theory development and material technology to make his dream a reality.”
http://www.todaysengineer.org/2003/may/history.asp

And, very simple,so it is with the rest of 'modern physics'
NOTHING good has come out of it. EVER

0 Replies

Idiot.

Quote:

“Lilienfeld had the basic concept of controlling the flow of current in a semiconductor to make an amplifying device. It took many years of theory development and material technology to make his dream a reality.” (emphasis added)

Yeah . . . it took many years . . . until 1947.

Liar.

1 Reply

@Setanta,

PS, we usually state that Quantum theory dates to about 1900 (earliest work actually in the late 1870's)

I think Quohog's problem is reading comprehension

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Yes, i already mentioned the 1900-1925 period of "old quantum" mechanics. Whatever his problem is, i believe he went to university, and tanked because he couldn't understand the science and either couldn't or wouldn't do the work. Now he's running around online raging against the discipline that defeated him.

0 Replies

By the way, the late 19th and early 20th centuries were a golden age for new scientific theory.

0 Replies

@Setanta,

Setanta wrote:

Hey, asshole, knock off the disobliging, sneering names. I don't do that to you. If you can't return the courtesy, then don't say a goddamned thing to me or about me. Capiche?

Asshole not a sneering name? OK. Noted. I shall not ever use that term in reference to you. But, if you continue to look for slurs where none are intended, I'm sure you will find many.

1 Reply

Thunderbolts of the gods

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know