@Olivier5,
Ha. What do you mean "That's not the question."? Yes - that was my question. 15 thousand rockets is not anything any city would tolerate.
and you are wrong on both points:
"They're ok with meaningless talks "
The polls say Israelis want a 2-state solution, and the Palestinians do as well:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/161456/israelis-palestinians-pro-peace-process-not-hopeful.aspx
Why would you want to spoil that for the both peoples just to keep having an agenda to protest about something?
"That's not the question. The question is: is that going to be a strong motivation for a peace deal? "
I never understood this twisted logic. What makes you think that it is the violence that leads to peace? If there were no rockets from Gaza after the pullout in 2005 - there would be no IDF in the West Bank by now.
For decades the Arab states tried your way of trying to defeat Israel militarily - they failed again and again and gain. That happened even before the occupation in the West Bank. In fact that occupation is the result of one of those wars. Can't people learn from mistakes? Violence only breeds more violence.
"The answer is no: it's not a big enough nuisance to the current fairly good security situation that it would lead the Israeli gvt to make concessions. "
It has nothing to do with security. Israelis don't want to control Palestinians. Try talking to Israelis instead of listening to what others say about their opinions. Barak and Olmert gave the Palestinians basically the whole 1967 border land with a few land swaps.:
http://mondoweiss.net/images/2011/11/468-map.jpg
It was the Palestinians who decided to reject it. I still don't know why. I hope they are wiser this time.
"Beside, there's no reason to believe Gaza will send less rockets if a deal is struck with Abbas."
This is funny. So you agree that Gaza sends rockets at Israelis for no good reason what so ever?