@FBM,
FBM wrote:RE: 'Irrational Thinking' hinders 'Scientific Progress', 'Harms the Planet' and 'Threatens our Lives'
This claim is made in connection with the denialism of climate change. I am not denying the climate change - actually I am on the other side.
So and so you have taken stochastically a quote made in connection with something else and on very different problem, why don't you prove that all these statements are directly and unconditionally applicable to the verification & validation of the Big Bang 'theory'.
The verification and validation tests of whatever are not denialism - denialism is when you don't like the results and are twisting them to fit your own twisted understanding of the world. In this sense in terms of the origin of the Universe you are much greater denialist than I ever will be able to be.
2. You will have to prove that the request for making physical interpretation of math results from theoretical physics is 'irrational thinking' and that the tautology logic of the Big Bang 'theory' is the real 'rational thinking' ... or perhaps the contradiction of the Big Bang theory with the law for preservation of energy and the second law of thermodynamics of physics is the jewel in the crown of the 'rational thinking'.
3. What about the 'scientific progress'. The main idea of the scientific progress is to contribute to the quality of life - healthcare, employment, comfort of living (healthy food, clean water, air-conditioning), etc. Can you explain how exactly a 'scientific progress' of the fossil fuels industry that causes extreme temperatures of +50 deg. C and -50 deg.C and extreme rainfall/snowfall (>50 mm/hour) with the climate change is covering the concept of 'progress', no matter whether scientific or industrial. You neither know already into which climate zone you are living, nor why.
From where automatically follows that the incorrect quoting and the misrepresentation of the original statements 'Harms the Planet' and 'Threatens our Lives'.