64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:54 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:


How about we jail any liberal that commits any crime for 4 years?

Would you agree to that Parados?


So, you want people with guns to get away with crimes? Or do you want to simply put people in jail for their political views?
Do you think gun laws should be enforced?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:03 am
@Val Killmore,
FYI McTag is Scot living in the England.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:12 am
@Val Killmore,
Go back and read your statements Val. You misrepresented DrewDad's argument by stating he wanted to ban all guns. THEN you attempted to refute the argument you made up but attributed to DrewDad by using an analogy.
Your analogy was the refutation NOT the misrepresentation.

http://able2know.org/topic/203766-80#post-5203650
Val Killmore wrote:

DrewDad wrote:

The suggestion that we need "more good guys with guns"(Actual argument by LaPierre) is like suggesting the Titanic should hit another iceberg, but on the other side of the ship.(Analogy that attempts to refute LaPierre's argument)



The suggestion that we should ban guns in America (Drew Dad never made such an argument so the straw man basis)is like suggesting ships should be banned from sailing the seas after the Titanic crashed into an iceberg and sank.(The analogy attempts to refute an argument never made so completes the strawman fallacy.)


Now, unless you want to argue that LaPierre never made the statement that we need more good guys with guns there is no straw man in DrewDad's laying out the opponents argument and then refutation with an analogy. You can't argue that the analogy misrepresents the argument by LaPierre since it clearly is based on the argument that LaPierre DID make.
firefly
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:27 am
@parados,
@reply all

Today's senseless tragedy due to guns...

Quote:
Two firefighters shot dead in upstate New York
By Catherine E. Shoichet and Chuck Johnston, CNN
Mon December 24, 2012

(CNN) -- At least two firefighters were shot and killed at the scene of a fire that engulfed multiple houses in upstate New York on Monday, police said.

Doctors treated two other firefighters for gunshot wounds, police in Webster, New York, told reporters.

Authorities believe one or more shooters took aim at the firefighters after they left their vehicles, Police Chief Gerald Pickering said.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo described it as a "horrific shooting" and a "senseless act of violence."

"Volunteer firefighters and police officers were injured and two were taken from us as they once again answered the call of duty," he said in a statement.

It was unclear whether there were any suspects.

"We have different individuals that were possible people with knowledge, but at this point I can't really comment," Monroe County Sheriff Patrick O'Flynn told reporters.

For hours, the gunfire stopped firefighters from working to extinguish the flames and forced police SWAT teams to evacuate homes in the area.

Firefighters first arrived before 6 a.m., said Rob Boutillier, Webster's fire marshal. By 9 a.m., flames had engulfed three houses and a vehicle, he said.

"It's still an active crime scene," Pickering said. "We have firefighters there at the location. It took a while to make it safe ... to put out the fires."

Doctors were treating the wounded firefighters Monday morning, said Teri D'Agostino, a spokeswoman for Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York. They were in guarded condition, she said.

One firefighter escaped from the scene in his own vehicle about an hour after he was shot, then was taken to the hospital by an ambulance from another location, Boutillier said.

Another wounded firefighter was conscious and speaking when he was removed from the scene, Boutillier said.

The shooting comes amid a renewed debate over gun control in the United States after a gunman killed 26 people at a Connecticut elementary school earlier this month.

President Barack Obama has set a January deadline for "concrete proposals" to deal with gun violence.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, has said she will introduce legislation to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004. The White House has said that the president supports that effort.

Speaking to reporters on Friday, the National Rifle Association's president called for more guns in the wake of the mass shooting, proposing putting an armed guard in every U.S. school in order to protect children.

On Sunday, NRA President Wayne LaPierre told NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would not express support for any new gun restrictions, saying most gun laws on the books are currently rarely enforced.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/24/us/new-york-firefighters-shooting/?hpt=us_c1


America is the land of senseless gun violence.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:35 am
@firefly,
Two more murders on your head, oralloy and gunga.

Notice that both Diane Feinstein and Pres. Obama are working to ban assault weapons.

Let's have no more of your contention that an assault weapons ban is dead.

The idiots with the guns who keep using them are the ones who insure sane gun control will pass.
JTT
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:46 am
@firefly,
Quote:
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo described it as a "horrific shooting" and a "senseless act of violence."


Where is Cuomo when it comes to Iraq, Afghanistan, and all the other senseless acts of violence that the US has heaped upon millions?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:53 am
@MontereyJack,
Why these nutcases would advocate for more guns and killings is beyond comprehension. They lack not only common sense, but increase the danger for everybody by their "no limits on gun ownership."

They're all crazy!
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:58 am
@MontereyJack,


The reason why left wing nutcases advocate for less guns and more killings is beyond comprehension.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 11:59 am
@cicerone imposter,
Notice the silence for my question about whether AR-15s are manufactured in the US or just assembled or simply distributed.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:10 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
...my question about whether AR-15s..


There are many manufacturers of AR-15 type rifles - you need to be much more specific with your question
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:11 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Two firemen got killed by guns, then a policeman saves a woman in freezing water. The NRA and supporters of guns have no common sense.

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/news-26797925/hero-cop-jumps-into-frigid-waters-to-rescue-woman-31397242.html
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:14 pm
@cicerone imposter,

Old news, but did you know that New York state currently has some very strict
gun control laws in effect and the criminal evil still managed to kill the firemen.

If you think for a moment that stricter gun control laws and bans on weapons that look
a certain way then you are what is called a low information voter - you are dangerous.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:24 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Notice the silence for my question about whether AR-15s are manufactured in the US or just assembled or simply distributed.


Most peop0le around here walk around with 2 AA12

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:24 pm
@H2O MAN,
You can't see the forest for the trees; without guns, those two firemen would be alive today.

More guns only means more innocent people gets killed - by accident or murder.

You never have shown any common sense on any topic. Your brain is drowning in your own "water."

firefly
 
  3  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:25 pm
@cicerone imposter,
It's more accurate to say the firemen were murdered--they now believe the blaze was deliberately set, as a trap to lure the firemen there--so they could be shot.
And an off-duty cop (who would be armed) stopped to help and he was wounded--and one of the dead was a police officer who was also a volunteer fireman.
Quote:
The suspected assailant also died at the scene, the Webster police chief, Gerald L. Pickering said, though it was unclear if he was killed by a self-inflicted gunshot or by the authorities.

“It does appear that it was a trap that was set,” Chief Pickering said of the blaze that drew the firefighters. “Causative reasons, we don’t have at this time.”

One of the firefighters was “able to flee the scene on his own,'’ he added. “The other three were pinned down at the location.”

Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester said two firefighters were in “guarded condition.” The two others died at the scene, Chief Pickering said.

The firefighters were from the West Webster Fire Department, about four miles from the blaze, and were believed to be volunteers.

As he recited the names of the four firefighters at a news conference on Monday morning, Chief Pickering repeatedly choked up. One of the deceased, Michael J. Chiapperini, was a police lieutenant in the Webster Police Department.

“These people get up in the middle of the night to go put out fires,” he said. “They don’t expect to be shot and killed.”

An off-duty police officer from Greece, N.Y., who happened to be driving by and stopped to help suffered shrapnel wounds from the shooting, Chief Pickering added.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/nyregion/2-firefighters-killed-in-western-new-york.html?hp


You have no "freedom" in a country where you constantly have to fear being shot.
Quote:
The NRA and supporters of guns have no common sense.

That's an understatement. But not all gun supporters agree with the NRA--many do not.

This was another mass shooting today--aimed at firefighters trying to do their job--but, no matter how many senseless gun deaths like this keep happening, the NRA will continue to deny that the problem is the easy availability of the guns that make these killings possible.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:34 pm
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/63772_407508715995852_1756524874_n.jpg


I've wanted the government to set up a proper militia too.

But your thing about "limits" is a bit out of place. Militiamen have the right to own machineguns, grenades/grenade launchers, anti-tank bazookas, and Stinger missiles. And they have the right to keep them all in their own homes.

(And of course, having a militia would not in any way invalidate the right of non-militiamen to own assault weapons.)
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:36 pm
@firefly,

Murdered?
Of course they were murdered!

New York states strict gun bans and restrictive gun
control laws did not protect the innocent from evil.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:37 pm
@McTag,
McTag wrote:
oralloy wrote:
If someone were suspicious, the guard could issue a challenge and demand that the suspicious person comply with his orders.


If the intruder were armed and intent on murder, and the guard issued such a challenge, the smart money would not be on the guard in that situation imho.


Keep in mind that the guard would also be armed, and if issuing a challenge to someone, would also be mentally prepared to react to aggression from the potential bad guy.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:37 pm
@reasoning logic,
You live in Georgia to?
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 12:39 pm
@cicerone imposter,


CI, more meaningless moronic mental masturbation...
that's all we get from you these days ... why so serious?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 02/02/2025 at 02:44:04