64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jun, 2013 02:52 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Not down here it isn't.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jun, 2013 03:06 pm
@izzythepush,
Mostly the people, plus I have a love of history and Britain is full of history.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jun, 2013 03:51 pm
@mysteryman,
I'm glad you had a good time.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jun, 2013 04:53 pm
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:
Mostly the people, plus
I have a love of history and Britain is full of history.
Get some ancient gold or silver coins !





David
parados
 
  2  
Reply Sun 2 Jun, 2013 07:26 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Silly person where did I say that?


Here -
Quote:
Of course that is one of the many reasons why such changes should not be done for light reasons and should be reserved for a last resort not the first or second or third resort.

See the outcome of the French revolution for an example of an armed rebellion going very bad.

0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jun, 2013 01:59 pm
@RABEL222,
Since Canelback has a military contract does that Camelback part of the military as well? How about any company who happens to have a contract with the military, does that make them part of the govt?
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 05:30 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

Mostly the people, plus
I have a love of history and Britain is full of history.

Get some ancient gold or silver coins !



The vikings took most of the ancient coins north ..........LOL
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 11:07 am
@Baldimo,
Any company who hires a purchasing officer, who has done business with them has become a part of government through the military. Its legal but not in our best interest. Remember the military industrial complex Ike told us about. No, of course not. Your 12 year old mind only goes back to the last election,
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 11:15 am
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
Any company who hires a purchasing officer, who has done business
with them has become a part of government through the military.
Are u crazy, or just stupid ??




RABEL222 wrote:
Its legal but not in our best interest.
Remember the military industrial complex Ike told us about.
Yes; very distinctly, like it was yesterday.
Ike did not say that Winchester is part of any government.
If he were that dum, he 'd not have defeated the 3rd Reich.





David

0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 02:54 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
Since Canelback has a military contract does that Camelback part of the military as well? How about any company who happens to have a contract with the military, does that make them part of the govt?


It does get a bit tricky but I have seen in legal terms that corporations are considered extension arms of government because they have laws written in their favor.

I guess if you have enough money and can lobby to make changes in the interest of your company, that you can have some say in matters.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 03:09 pm
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
Since Canelback has a military contract does that Camelback part of the military as well?
How about any company who happens to have a contract with the military, does that make them part of the govt?
reasoning logic wrote:


It does get a bit tricky but I have seen in legal terms that
corporations are considered extension arms of government
because they have laws written in their favor.

I guess if you have enough money and can lobby to make changes
in the interest of your company, that you can have some say in matters.
"are considered" by whom ??????


reasoning logic wrote:
because they have laws written in their favor.
Is that a non-sequitur ??





David
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 05:21 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Whats with your cheap insulting bullshit. Are you and Baldimo related, brother and sister, husband and wife. You seem to jump in when he/it/she and I have a disagreement. I think while I am not the smartest person on this site neither am I the dumbest. One thing I do wonder about though. If you were a lawyer how did stay out of jail when you told the Judge who disagreed with you what A STUPID **** HE WAS?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 05:36 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
"are considered" by whom ??????


I will be honest, "I was not able to locate the link I wanted to share but that does not mean it does not exist but rather I have failed at locating it.

Maybe this will give you a different opinion about corporations. If that does not work than try the later video to become even more so disoriented.





OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 06:06 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
Whats with your cheap insulting bullshit. Are you and Baldimo related, brother and sister, husband and wife.
You seem to jump in when he/it/she and I have a disagreement.
I remain free to comment on any post.
I guess u did not know that.



RABEL222 wrote:
I think while I am not the smartest person on this site neither am I the dumbest.
One thing I do wonder about though. If you were a lawyer how
did stay out of jail when you told the Judge who disagreed with
you what A STUPID **** HE WAS?
It was never my job to advise him on the quality of his intellect,
nor did any of them ever ASK me that.
I just argued the facts n the law.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 06:09 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

DAVID wrote:
"are considered" by whom ??????


I will be honest, "I was not able to locate the link I wanted to share
but that does not mean it does not exist but rather I have failed at locating it.
That does not indicate that it had any validity.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jun, 2013 07:05 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
That does not indicate that it had any validity.


No it does not and I did not state that it did, Imagine that we both agree that it does not add validity. Even so the video I shared may have validity but you would not know unless you seen it. Cool
0 Replies
 
komr98
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Jun, 2013 11:34 am
@reasoning logic,
I'm not Christian....
0 Replies
 
komr98
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Jun, 2013 11:38 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I should've been more clear from the start. I don't know what I want to be done but I do know there have been too many shootings (in the US) recently and something must be done to try to prevent more shootings. So far gun regulations are the only somewhat reasonable proposal I've heard. Feel free to inform me of others.
0 Replies
 
komr98
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Jun, 2013 11:42 am
@OmSigDAVID,
My point still stands; a gun is much more effective (and fast) at killing someone than a screwdrier...
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 10 Jun, 2013 02:11 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
I think while I am not the smartest person on this site neither am I the dumbest.

I'm sure you think that, but you are unqualified to draw such conclusions.

In fact, you and CI are tied for one of those records.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Friends don't let friends fat-talk - Discussion by hawkeye10
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 03/02/2021 at 05:07:27