64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:23 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:
Liberal gun control

http://i.imgur.com/p8IWx.jpg


Wow.

How long 'til that clown accidentally kills himself?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:25 pm
@Val Killmore,
Val Killmore wrote:
Is name calling your last resort after desperate measures of trying then failing in finding consistency with the logic in your criterion proposed to justify a ban on guns?


CI in general is too stupid to understand much of anything. All he ever does is engage in name-calling.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:29 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

oralloy wrote:
But, even if someone proved that banning guns would save lives,
our freedom would still take precedence over everything else.


My god, you are seriously unwell to say something like that.
FOR THE RECORD:
I refuse to relinquish MY freedom, NO MATTER WHAT.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:33 pm
@oralloy,
Ragman wrote:
BillRM wrote:
Are cars more important then children as far far far far more children died in car accidents then by guns so are we uncaring for not banning cars?

Footnote as the ban the assault weapons people are unlikely to save one child and take attentions away from real solution such people do not care about children in my opinion they just wish to used the death of children to promote there own programs.


Congratulations are in order. When I don't have you on ignore, I've noticed that you've got the distinction of always making an impertinent and irrelevant analogy every single time. You've gotten this down to an art form. Did you study this somewhere or is it a natural talent?

oralloy wrote:
Nonsense. There was nothing impertinent or irrelevant about his analogy.


You just don't like it because it shows the hypocrisy of the Freedom Haters.
I must agree; it does.





David
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:33 pm
@raprap,
raprap wrote:
Ultimately though when you compare the hazards of cars/transportation and firearms you also have to include a benefit analysis. As Cars/Transportation provide an almost universal daily benefit of moving people and goods they have a almost continuous universal use. Granted they are kinetic and as kinetic they present special hazards--consequently cars/transportqation requires licensing, and operator and equipment testing.

Firearms are another matter--unlike cars/transportation they are not used daily except fora very small fraction of the total population--moreover their effect on an even smaller portion of the population tends to create new hazards (suicide, accidents, murder, mass shootings).


People have the right to carry guns when they go about in public.

There is no right to drive.



raprap wrote:
In addition firearms are not safety certified (except at point of manufacture), nor is universal certification of users (daily or otherwise) , and only a small fractcion of firearms and users licensed.


Lots of licenses to carry guns in public require certification.



raprap wrote:
Consequently, the comparison of firearms and cars/transportatioin is silly and frivolous.


Not at all. The comparison is quite useful in undercutting the Freedom Haters' claims that they care about saving lives.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:36 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
But if we had tighter controls and restrictions on firearms, those would-be copycats couldn't so easily obtain their weapons.


It's a shame the Democrats defeated the push to have background checks at gun shows. Even the NRA supported it.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:36 pm
@oralloy,
Another day in America, complete with more gun violence resulting in multiple deaths--at least one of which occurred in a church.
Quote:
December 21, 2012
Gunman Kills 3 in Central Pennsylvania
By EMMA G. FITZSIMMONS

A gunman in central Pennsylvania fatally shot three people Friday morning, including a woman who was hanging Christmas decorations inside a church, before being killed by police officers during a gun battle, the authorities said.

At least two Pennsylvania state troopers were also wounded after they responded to the attack.

The initial shooting took place inside the Juniata Valley Gospel Church near Route 22 and Juniata Valley Road near Hollidaysburg, Penn., a rural community about 40 miles southwest of Penn State University and 100 miles east of Pittsburgh, the authorities said.

The armed man, who has not been identified, fatally shot a woman in the church’s fellowship hall, where she had been decorating for a children’s Christmas party, said Philip McCaulley, the son of the chuch’s preacher. The woman, whose identity has not been released by the authorities, was in her 50s, said Mr. McCaulley.

While many details about the shooting, which occurred at about 10:30 a.m., remained unclear Friday afternoon, Terry Tomassetti, chair of the Blair County commission, said that after the gunman killed his victims he took off in his vehicle.

It was not immediately known where the other two victims had been shot.

When police officers blocked the roadway with their squad car, the gunman rammed the officers’ vehicle and opened fire, said Mr. Tomassetti, who was briefed about the attack by law enforcement officials. The officers returned fire, Mr. Tomassetti said, killing the gunman.

The relationship between the gunman and the other two victims is unclear.

“It is something rare in this area,” said Mr. Tomassetti; he said the population of the largely rural county was about 125,000.

The wounds to the state troopers were not life-threatening, and they were being treated at a local hospital, said Diane Meling, a spokeswoman for the Blair County Emergency Management Office.

It was not known whether either officer had been struck by bullets.

“The crime scene is spread out over a relatively large area,” Ms. Meling said. “The scene is now secure. There is no threat.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/us/gunman-kills-3-in-central-pennsylvania.html?hp
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:40 pm
@firefly,


It's hard to believe the victims were unarmed
tsarstepan
 
  3  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:49 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:


How long 'til that clown accidentally kills himself?

And here comes the most racist propaganda since Pamela Rosa. Everyone knows when you conservative gunfacists are crying against any gun reforms that you are not including unfettered gun ownership for minorities like African -Americans or Hispanics, etc... but FOR UNFETTERED gun ownership for CONSERVATIVE WHITE MALES AND WHITE MALES ALONE. Any gun ownership by blacks, gays, Asians, Hispanics, and nonCaucasian males isn't in your ideal definition of what is defined by your racist, hate mongering, fear mongering definition of the Second Amendment.

Basically to sum it up, if you're NOT a WHITE CONSERVATIVE male then the second amendment doesn't apply to you. If you are a WHITE CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN AMERICAN MALE then you should be able to own as many weapons as possible especially if it allows you to take down the democracy of the United States in order to create the more perfect RACIAL PURIST white males in control country of the USKKK.
firefly
 
  2  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 06:50 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
It's hard to believe the victims were unarmed

Stop thinking your guns will always keep you safe from other people's guns--they won't and they can't.

Quote:
The woman at Juniata Valley Gospel Church had cooked food the day before for the funeral of the longtime pastor, said the Rev. James McCaulley, his brother. The central Pennsylvania church was still reeling from the Rev. David McCaulley's death when the woman returned to decorate the church hall -- named after the pastor of 58 years -- and bullets ripped through a window, he said.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/21/4-dead-including-gunman-in-rural-pennsylvania-shooting/#ixzz2FjlvEaQs
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:05 pm
@firefly,


You would rather have bullets rip through victims
than offer them the chance to defend themselves.

Who are you to make that decision for them?
Who is anyone to make that decision for them?
0 Replies
 
Val Killmore
 
  1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:07 pm
@tsarstepan,
tsarstepan wrote:

oralloy wrote:


How long 'til that clown accidentally kills himself?

And here comes the most racist propaganda since Pamela Rosa. Everyone knows when you conservative gunfacists are crying against any gun reforms that you are not including unfettered gun ownership for minorities like African -Americans or Hispanics, etc... but FOR UNFETTERED gun ownership for CONSERVATIVE WHITE MALES AND WHITE MALES ALONE. Any gun ownership by blacks, gays, Asians, Hispanics, and nonCaucasian males isn't in your ideal definition of what is defined by your racist, hate mongering, fear mongering definition of the Second Amendment.

Basically to sum it up, if you're NOT a WHITE CONSERVATIVE male then the second amendment doesn't apply to you. If you are a WHITE CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN AMERICAN MALE then you should be able to own as many weapons as possible especially if it allows you to take down the democracy of the United States in order to create the more perfect RACIAL PURIST white males in control country of the USKKK.


tsarstepan, it is interesting that you took oralloy's comment in that direction just because the person in the picture is an African American. I'm quite certain he would have said the same thing if that individual was Caucasian, Asian, or Hispanic. The reason being that there is a safety rule which is largely common sense, and that is never deliberately point a gun at anything you're not willing to shoot, and yes, that includes yourself. Always point a gun in a safe direction, even if you think that the gun is not loaded or if the gun switch is on safe.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:27 pm
@H2O MAN,
The relentless gush of US propaganda just can't be silenced. A few forlorn dogs lying around staring at the pics would have added much.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  4  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:32 pm
@firefly,
i have been following this (often tediously repetitious) thread since its inception. I was looking forward to the NRA's press conference today.
The headline in one news account left me underwhelmed: "A Good Guy With A Gun" Could Have Saved Lives In Sandy Hook.
A cynic might conclude that the NRA is trying to drum up sales of guns, which have been going down for years.
A second point. A commentator here wrote "People have the right to carry guns when they go about in public." Fair enough with the appropriate permit, I guess, but I am hung up on the logistics. You strap on your weapon, get in your car and drive on public streets to the public library. But then you need to go to the grocery store or to my store with my adjacent private parking lot. What do you do with your gun when you get there?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:47 pm
@tsarstepan,
tsarstepan wrote:
And here comes the most racist propaganda since Pamela Rosa. Everyone knows when you conservative gunfacists are crying against any gun reforms that you are not including unfettered gun ownership for minorities like African -Americans or Hispanics, etc... but FOR UNFETTERED gun ownership for CONSERVATIVE WHITE MALES AND WHITE MALES ALONE. Any gun ownership by blacks, gays, Asians, Hispanics, and nonCaucasian males isn't in your ideal definition of what is defined by your racist, hate mongering, fear mongering definition of the Second Amendment.

Basically to sum it up, if you're NOT a WHITE CONSERVATIVE male then the second amendment doesn't apply to you. If you are a WHITE CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN AMERICAN MALE then you should be able to own as many weapons as possible especially if it allows you to take down the democracy of the United States in order to create the more perfect RACIAL PURIST white males in control country of the USKKK.


I take it that it's starting to sink in with people that the Supreme Court will not be allowing a ban on harmless cosmetic features???
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:49 pm
@realjohnboy,
realjohnboy wrote:
A second point. A commentator here wrote "People have the right to carry guns when they go about in public." Fair enough with the appropriate permit, I guess, but I am hung up on the logistics. You strap on your weapon, get in your car and drive on public streets to the public library. But then you need to go to the grocery store or to my store with my adjacent private parking lot. What do you do with your gun when you get there?


Just leave it in its holster.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  2  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:52 pm
@JTT,
You are studiously avoiding the information, that you provided, that clearly illustrates you are a liar, Oralloy. Why would that be?
oralloy
 
  0  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 07:57 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:
You are studiously avoiding the information, that you provided, that clearly illustrates you are a liar, Oralloy. Why would that be?


Didn't I already answer this?

It would be because I am not a liar, and there is no such information to the contrary.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  2  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 08:19 pm
@realjohnboy,
Quote:
A cynic might conclude that the NRA is trying to drum up sales of guns, which have been going down for years.


Nothing could be further from the truth, Obama is responsible for years of record sales in the gun industry.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Fri 21 Dec, 2012 08:29 pm
@realjohnboy,
Quote:
I am hung up on the logistics.


Picture if you will a uniformed officer with a holstered open carry sidearm walking from store to store as he pleases. He stands out and it's very easy to see his firearm. Now picture the same officer in street clothes armed with the same firearm holstered in a way that conceals it from view... walking from store to store as he pleases. He blends in with the surroundings. Permitted civilians will look much like the cop in street clothes and you will have a difficult time spotting the holstered firearm as they walk from store to store.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 03/10/2025 at 07:15:29