Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

@Ragman,

Unless you are forced to protect those means of transportation and commerce

0 Replies

@Region Philbis,

Region Philbis wrote:

oralbuoy

You engage in name-calling because you are too stupid to come up with an intelligent argument.

0 Replies

@JTT,

JTT, I understand your confusion, but that's just an Atlanta thang, the rest of the state is cool.

http://cdn.ebbets.com/images/large/atl40t.jpg

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

I know, ci...I got a kick out of his last response. But...what can you do? Ya gotta laugh it off...and chalk it up to living in America right now.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Have you had too much to drink or replying to the wrong person?
Or are you speechless that your logic behind your standards which must be met to ban guns holds no water, and just replying to me thinking that whoever gets the last word wins?

3 Replies

@H2O MAN,

Maybe I have been too rash, h20guy. You`re nowhere near bright enough to qualify as a Georgia cracker.

0 Replies

@Val Killmore,

That about sums up CI

0 Replies

@Val Killmore,

'High capacity clips'

http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/High-Capacity-Rifle-Clip.jpg

1 Reply

@Val Killmore,

You,

Quote:

your logic behind your standards which must be met to ban guns holds no water,

Where have I ever even suggested such a stupid thing? Those are not my "standards." They are just examples used to show/prove that more guns only results in more killings and accidents.

Too spacial for your brain to comprehend. What schools did you attend? They have failed you miserably!

1 Reply

@H2O MAN,

'High capacity clips', low capacity brain.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

question to any of the gun brandishers. IF the 94 assault ban were to be reinstated and soon in effect effect,would you support a mega clip ban as part of the "stand alone" designs of an assault weapon? And if that were the case, would the BUSHMASTER .223 be an assault weapin by definition?

If the ban were reinstated, it would be struck down by the courts.

And it might take the magazine ban with it.

And if so, the NRA would give you a medal for your help in getting the magazine ban struck down.

0 Replies

@ehBeth,

ehBeth wrote:

oralloy wrote:
But, even if someone proved that banning guns would save lives, our freedom would still take precedence over everything else.

My god, you are seriously unwell to say something like that.

???

No, I just value America's freedom.

0 Replies

@BillRM,

Not a bad idea. Still, some of those buy backs would yield an enviable profit margin.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

SPORTING GUNS ARE LIMITED IN THEIR CAPACITIES AND THEIR WAYS OF SHOOTING. eg, a semi automatic .223 sport style gun doesnt have an available " ammunition tuibe" they use 5 shot clips and several makes WILL NOT accept banana clips.

That would be news to all the varmint hunters who use 30-round magazines.

farmerman wrote:

Why did Bushmaster decide to make a gun that looks and fires like an M-16 with the only exception being that itd take a fairly simple conversion to make it fire full-auto

Because they felt like it, and because the Constitution protects their right to do so.

And hardly simple to convert. In addition to buying the specialized parts, you need a competent gunsmith to install them, otherwise you just end up ruining the gun.

Not many competent gunsmiths seem willing to commit such major felonies.

farmerman wrote:

The BUSHMASTER IS AN ASSAULT WEAPON by its ability to rapidly fire semi auto and accept big clips and its short barrel(it fairly useless as a sport gun).

Nope. It is an assault weapon because of its cosmetics alone.

farmerman wrote:

All the other features(bayonnet mount, etc) were knocked out cause they were superfluous to the guns mission opf rapid fire and killing ability.

Careful. You're going to undermine your effort to pretend there is any reason to ban those features.

farmerman wrote:

If you keep repeating your same old tripe,

Funny how you are unable to point out any facts I have wrong.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

You are studiously avoiding the information, that you provided, that clearly illustrates you are a liar, Oralloy. Why would that be.

3 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

You,
Quote:
your logic behind your standards which must be met to ban guns holds no water,

Where have I ever even suggested such a stupid thing? Those are not my "standards." They are just examples used to show/prove that more guns only results in more killings and accidents.

Too spacial for your brain to comprehend. What schools did you attend? They have failed you miserably!

You really think banning guns on the standard which you've stated in its essence is "good" logic. Even someone with a dim light bulb will catch the problem in your logic. I'm surprised you haven't, or are you too arrogant to admit the silliness in your "logic" to ban guns.

Here I'll show it to you again

Quote:

More ______ only means more accidents and killings by ______.

The extremes are, a) no ______ = no killings or accidents with______, or b) more ______ = more accidents and killings.

I'll ask it again: if you think this logic is "good" to start banning objects such as guns why aren't you consistent with the logic and start a movement to ban alcohol, motor vehicles, swimming pools, etc.

1 Reply

@JTT,

0 Replies

@ehBeth,

Quote:

oralloy wrote:
But, even if someone proved that banning guns would save lives, our freedom would still take precedence over everything else.

My god, you are seriously unwell to say something like that.

LOL would you care to limit the driving speed to 30 MPH world wide as that would save tens of thousands of children every year and if not then you value your travel time more then the lives of thousands of children a year. Shame on you.

1 Reply

@H2O MAN,

H2O MAN wrote:

It has been said that cicerone imposter molests Collies.

I've heard that too. Mr. Green

0 Replies

@H2O MAN,

H2O MAN wrote:

... consider how well they have done with "Assault Weapons".

The 1994 AWB never really expired in states like Connecticut, California and other BLUE states.

The Supreme Court is going to do away with those laws.

Even if this currently-proposed unconstitutional monstrosity is stopped by the NRA, Mr. Gura will still come around to suing one of those states to get the Supreme Court to topple all assault weapons laws.

Right now Mr. Gura is focusing on having the courts rule that everyone has the right to carry guns when they go about in public, even in our largest cities.

But there will be more lawsuits after that one.

0 Replies

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know