64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:07 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
Christ, you gotta wonder what is in the water these days!


word



let's stick bandaid after bandaid after bandaid on the problem and not deal with what's going on



buying 26 coffees for people in line behind you is not going to change America (that whole campaign is seriously p!ss!ng me off)
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:08 am
@BillRM,


Our numerous existing 'feel good' laws didn't stop this recent and other evil actions,
what makes Dem Libs think a new or revised 'feel good' gun ban would change anything?
ehBeth
 
  1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:10 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:
a 'feel good' gun ban world


awesomeness
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:16 am
@ehBeth,


an awesome 'feel good' Dem Lib ban world.

What are Dem Libs putting in the water these days?
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:17 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
The 'feel good' laws didn't stop this recent evil action, what makes the libs think a 'feel good' gun ban world change anything?


Strangely I think of myself as a liberal and voted two times for Obama, but that does not mean I had shut down my mind and think that feel goods laws such as a renew assault weapon ban is going to do a damn thing to made the children of this society in any way or in any manner safer.

A worthless solution is far worst then no solution as it give people a false sense of security.

spendius
 
  0  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:17 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
. Relying on what worked in the 18th Century in these matters is absurd.


Thorstein Veblen wrote this in 1923--

Quote:
Meanwhile, while these immutable principles of law and morals have continued to embody the habits of thought of a bygone age, the industrial system............is of the twentieth century and is in no respect and in no degree immutable; quite the contrary in fact. While modern men continue to boast and laud the changeless antiquity and stability of the rules which govern their industrial relations, it is at the same time their pride and boast that the industrial arts which condition their behavior under these rules are forever changing, progressively and at an ever-accelerating rate. In time, immutable rules of conduct enforced under progressively changing conditions should logically result in a muddle.


We have the muddle. And the industrial arts of 2012 have advanced since 1923 to a point which even such a far-sighted prophet as Veblen could not possibly have foreseen.

He continues--

Quote:
There is, of course, nothing particularly new or peculiarly civilised* about this obstinate assumption that the main specifications of the legal and moral code are ancient and immutable. Indeed, it is quite the usual thing among the common run of barbarians and savages, ancient and contemporary.


*The "z" in civilized must have appeared at a later date. It is more masculine with its straight lines and jagged angles than the sinuous "s".

And Oralloy, David, Bill and others are fully paid up to votes for what John Knox in 1558 called "The Monstrous Regiment of Women" . He was a spiritual leader of the Protestant Reformation in Scotland.

"Absurd" is an understatement Frank. Completely confused and absolutely ******* barmy is more like it.

H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:22 am
@BillRM,

Voting for Obama twice is something I won't hold against you because you still
have what most Dem Libs gave up long ago - common sense and rational thought
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:25 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
a bdsm bogger that i follow who is autistic and who has an autistic chemically imbalanced son says that a major problem hits at 18yo. parents at that point lose the ability to force treatment, and the courts are very loath to do so, so these young people drop out till they hurt someone. i would not be surprised if it turns out here that the mom was trying to pressure the kid to go back to treatment but he was refusing.


Autism isn't a mental illness--it's a neurodevelopmental disorder.

And, at 18, Adam Lanza was taking part-time classes at a college.

He had no tendencies toward aggression or violence that anyone who was in school with him had ever noticed.

There is no major problem that occurs in Autistic individuals at age 18, in fact, symptoms of autism spectrum disorders, like Asperger's, often diminish over time. But, that doesn't mean that an individual with Asperger's couldn't also suffer from other psychiatric problems. It's simply that, if he did have a condition, like Asperger's, that alone would not likely have led him to go on a shooting rampage.
Quote:
Individuals with autism spectrum disorders, who are often bullied in school and in the workplace, frequently do suffer from depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts. A divorce mediator who met with the parents of Adam Lanza, the gunman, during their divorce told The Associated Press that the couple had said that their son’s condition had been diagnosed as Asperger syndrome.

But experts say there is no evidence that they are more likely than any other group to commit violent crimes.

“Aggression in autism spectrum disorders is almost never directed to people outside the family or immediate caregivers, is almost never planned, and almost never involves weapons,” said Dr. Catherine Lord, director of the Center for Autism and the Developing Brain at NewYork-Presbyterian hospital. “Each of these aspects of the current case is more common in other populations than autism.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/health/fearing-a-stigma-for-people-with-autism.html


Quote:
It's important for the public to know that the gunman's actions can't be linked with autism spectrum disorders, said Dr. Max Wiznitzer, a pediatric neurologist and autism expert at Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital in Cleveland.

"Aggression and violence in the ASD population is reactive, not preplanned and deliberate," he said...

"When you talk about autism or anything on the autism spectrum, you're talking about a neural disorder," said CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta. "I think the terms do matter here. Second of all, just this whole idea that it's linked with violence in some way and specifically pre-planned violence, I think we can dispense with that."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/17/health/connecticut-shooting-autism/index.html


Quote:
i would not be surprised if it turns out here that the mom was trying to pressure the kid to go back to treatment but he was refusing...

If he was displaying some significant psychiatric problems (in addition to Asperger's), particularly problems relating to aggression or violence, why would his mother have been purchasing high power handguns, and a military type assault rifle, and taking her son to shooting ranges so he could practice with them? And, if he was so disturbed, that she had been trying to force him into some sort of treatment, why would she have left all those weapons--a mini-arsenol-- unsecured and available to him? That doesn't make sense.

Quote:
she agrees with me that bad gun control is not the problem, that it is a bad mental health system.

In this case, bad gun control was the problem--the mother left the weapons where they were available for her son's use.

It may have been the mother who also needed some mental heath treatment. We have no idea what was going on in that home, particularly after the parents divorced. Adam and his mother seem to have been alone together all of the time, she didn't work, and she didn't seem to socialize all that much, so they were both relatively isolated together. Who knows what was going on between them? The first person he killed was his mother--shooting her multiple times in the head. We don't know what their relationship was ever like, but we do know how it ended.

0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:28 am
@spendius,
There are only three valid reasons for opposing strict gun control--

1--guns as a sexual fetish

2--fear of one's fellow citizens

3--as a business proposition.

H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:30 am
@spendius,
You should be detained and medicated
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:37 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Don't expect to have a logical discussion with Frank Ap because it's not going to happen.

Just announcing that all government schools will now have an unspecified number of armed adults that are trained to eliminate evil threats to the students will decrease this kind of senseless attack on the once unarmed and unprotected schools


Right...like the fact that Fort Bragg and Fort Hood had one or two unspecified armed adults trained to eliminate evil threats deterred the shooters there from a senseless attack.

C'mon, H2O. If you are going to fault me about "logical discussions" at least do it in a post that has some semblance of logic to it.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:39 am
@spendius,
Thanks Spendius. You summed this up very well. I'm glad we are in synch on this issue.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:41 am
@spendius,
Quote:
Re: spendius (Post 5199882)
There are only three valid reasons for opposing strict gun control--

1--guns as a sexual fetish


As I said in another thread earlier, "Sometimes a gun is just a gun...but on the other hand, sometimes it ain't!"
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:43 am
@spendius,
Quote:
--fear of one's fellow citizens


An we should have a ban on fire extinguishers as having them mean an irrational fear of fire and a lack of faith in the fire department.
firefly
 
  3  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:43 am
@oralloy,
Quote:

Assault weapons are not "military style". They merely have harmless cosmetic features like a pistol grip and a flash suppressor.

And Americans have the right to have both assault weapons and handguns.


If some weapons are deemed dangerous to the public welfare they may be banned or more strictly regulated in the future. And that would be entirely Constitutional according to Justice Scalia.
Quote:
Justice Scalia added that laws banning “dangerous and unusual weapons” are “another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms.” He gave an example: “M-16 rifles and the like.”

When the case was argued in 2008, Justice Scalia suggested that other kinds of weapons and ammunition could be regulated.


Your alleged "right" to those assault weapons may be only temporary, oralloy, it is not written in stone. One of the reasons for establishing the Constitution was to promote the general welfare. The problem with gun violence in this country, and the mass/multiple shootings which have taken place with alarming frequency in recent years, is something that affects the general welfare, and government should act to try to limit the scope of the problem. That action may well take the form of tighter control over certain kinds of weapons, and their sale, and who is able to purchase and own them.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:44 am
@Frank Apisa,
You're attempting to tie the evil actions of a Muslim terrorists to the recent evil actions in Connecticut... please continue.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:44 am
@Frank Apisa,
The two of you have strange relationships with your 'guns'.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:51 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5199889)
You're attempting to tie the evil actions of a Muslim terrorists to the recent evil actions in Connecticut... please continue.


Ahhh...I see. You are saying that arming trained soldiers is not particularly effective if the enemy is a Muslim terrorist...but arming school teachers will work against nut-cases intent on killing anyone.

H2O...like I said, if you are going to question my logic, do it in a post that contains some logic.
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:52 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
An we should have a ban on fire extinguishers as having them mean an irrational fear of fire and a lack of faith in the fire department.

But you don't feel a need to carry a fire extinguisher around with you when you leave your home, but you do carry a gun because of your fears relating to other people.

And, the more other people who carry guns, the more those fears increase because the perceived need to defend one's self with lethal force increases.

That's the problem with advocating that everyone should be armed.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 19 Dec, 2012 08:52 am
@H2O MAN,
Stop playing with your semi-automatic! You'll go blind.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 03/01/2025 at 02:41:37