64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Fri 19 Apr, 2013 06:02 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
talk about armed and equipped, those guy's have all the toys.


Yes they do. Can you imagine having all those toys and hundreds if not thousand of friends playing a man hunt game with you, where you have to find one 19 year old boy and you get to shut the whole city down? Talk about a having a fun time playing with your toys?
BillRM
 
  1  
Fri 19 Apr, 2013 06:33 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Golly! I dident know that. Thanks for the info. Could you print a manual for clods like me so when I get my fully automatic weapon I wont shoot myself in the foot?


Foot???!!!!!?????

I was under the impression that you had claimed to had fired weapons but if you think that the recoil of any firearm would result in being shot in the foot that seems unlikely.

Now the feet of anyone in an apartment above your might be at risk however.

The recoil of firing even a 1911 45 pistol in a rapid manner make it hard to keep on target and not have the gun firing high above the target not low.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Fri 19 Apr, 2013 06:37 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
I've been hunting since you were crapping your diapers." response


That statement is bullshit if he think that a full auto weapon recoil would result in him shooting himself in the foot...................

No one need to fire any firearm more then once to get the idea that recoil cause the gun to raised not lower.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Fri 19 Apr, 2013 08:43 pm
@reasoning logic,
rs, you sound like you have plenty of man hunting, toy playing experience under your belt, but WE really don't care.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Fri 19 Apr, 2013 09:17 pm
When you cant dispute the facts than take part of ones statement and create a strawman. Never heard of shooting ones self in the foot. What part of the U>S> are you from Bill. I have been useing guns to hunt with, target shoot with for something like 67 years so the shitting your diapers was not a crack, it was fact if youve only been useing guns for 30 years. Do the math.
BillRM
 
  2  
Fri 19 Apr, 2013 09:34 pm
@RABEL222,
I hear the saying but it have nothing to do with the discussion concerning full auto weapons and once more the likelihood of you ever having a gun in your hands seem remote not only due to that comment but that you are trying to sell the idea that it is not a job for someone with the skills set of a gunsmith to convert a semi-auto weapon into a fully auto weapon or that fully auto weapons are more deadly on the whole then semi auto weapons.

In a firefight for keeping your enemy head down is about the only real usefulness of non-mounted fully auto machine guns.

If your desire is to just put a lot of lead downrange at close range for the purpose of wiping out a room full of children for example a pump/semi auto shot gun would do a better job.

If you wish to engage other shooters at any range the pray and spay method of going fully auto will likely get you kill as most of your fire go over the head of the person you are aiming at.

To sum up all your comments/postings taken together is a clear indication that you never fired a gun in your life.

So why do you just not come clean as there is no shame in never having had a firearm in your hands however there is shame over pretending otherwise.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 10:25 am
@BillRM,
I am glad that you think I am not as savy about guns as you are because I dont want to know that if I want to kill a group of 6 year olds a shotgun is the way to go. This is information I dont need. On the other hand you gun nuts glory in the fact that you know the most efficent way to kill people. I was just reading an article by a person who had interviewed a policeman who was very nervious about the citizens who demanded that they be allowed to carry guns. He believed that most dident try to work out solutions because they wanted a reason to kill someone. The article went on to state that some collages wanted to do a study of this fact but the NRA put a stop to it. Of course these people were probebly democrat liberals. The ones who wrote the article that is.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 01:08 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
I am glad that you think I am not as savy about guns as you are because I dont want to know that if I want to kill a group of 6 year olds a shotgun is the way to go. This is information I dont need.


That you don't know what you are talking about would not be such a problem if you were not trying to use your bottomless ignorance as the basis for advocating a policy.



RABEL222 wrote:
On the other hand you gun nuts glory in the fact that you know the most efficent way to kill people.


It is more that we object to you Freedom Haters trying to use your ignorance as justification for doing stupid things.



RABEL222 wrote:
I was just reading an article by a person who had interviewed a policeman who was very nervious about the citizens who demanded that they be allowed to carry guns. He believed that most dident try to work out solutions because they wanted a reason to kill someone.


Freedom Haters can't stand the idea of people having civil rights.
mysteryman
 
  1  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 02:11 pm
How can the NRA stop a college from doing any kind of research?
The NRA doesn't fund any colleges.
BillRM
 
  0  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 02:18 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
That you don't know what you are talking about would not be such a problem if you were not trying to use your bottomless ignorance as the basis for advocating a policy.


How true.................and claiming knowledge he does not have and when press he go to being proud of his lack of knowledge under the theory that it is more moral not to know what kind of weapons are the most deadly to children in a classroom for example.

Information you might find helpful in setting policies to protected children even if it for some reason it not moral to know that information.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 02:31 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Freedom Haters can't stand the idea of people having civil rights.


If you were to be intellectually honest just for a moment could you honestly say that you have ever met a person who hates being free?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 03:17 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
If you were to be intellectually honest just for a moment


You shouldn't run around falsely accusing people of your own intellectual dishonesty.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 03:45 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
If you were to be intellectually honest just for a moment could you honestly say that you have ever met a person who hates being free?


Quote:
You shouldn't run around falsely accusing people of your own intellectual dishonesty.


Would you please explain how my question was a statement of accusation?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 04:38 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
Would you please explain how my question was a statement of accusation?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

Your question presupposes that I am not always intellectually honest.
reasoning logic
 
  2  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 04:46 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Your question presupposes that I am not always intellectually honest.


Where does my question address the word always?

Will you attempt to address the question being asked?

Can you honestly say that you have ever met a person who hates being free?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 04:58 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
Where does my question address the word always?


In the part that alleges that I was not being intellectually honest.



reasoning logic wrote:
Will you attempt to address the question being asked?


Not as long as you continue to accuse me of not being intellectually honest.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 05:06 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Not as long as you continue to accuse me of not being intellectually honest.


Where have I accused you of anything as such? Lets just take a moment and say that I did.
Could you provide evidence too how you can always be truthful but yet you think that everyone else lies at times? or do you think that there are people on this planet who have never told a lie in their life? Shocked
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 05:11 pm
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
Can you honestly say that you have ever met a person who hates being free?


Have you ever met a person who qualified to have a view on such a matter. I haven't. What do you mean by "free" rl? Somebody on the way down from the fortieth floor?
RABEL222
 
  2  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 05:15 pm
@mysteryman,
The same way they bribed congress to kill gun laws. It dosent always take money. As you well know as an ex military man.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sat 20 Apr, 2013 05:15 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Have you ever met a person who qualified to have a view on such a matter.

How do you think that you are qualified to ask such a question being that you wish that you were my slave?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 07:58:33