64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:05 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

You think 1995 was during the last ten years? That figures.


LOL!! What difference, at this point, does it make?
0 Replies
 
revelette
 
  2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:07 am
@H2O MAN,
Which was 18 years ago (not ten) committed by a anti-gun control extremist. After that reasoned measures were put in place.

Quote:
As a result of the bombing, the U.S. government passed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, which tightened the standards for habeas corpus in the United States,[16] as well as legislation designed to increase the protection around federal buildings to deter future terrorist attacks.


Links at the source

Val Killmore
 
  0  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:11 am
@revelette,
Hmmm and I wonder what went wrong seeing that 9/11 occurred.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:13 am
@revelette,


I posted that it was the 1995 bombing for a reason and what
difference, at this point, does it make if it was more than 10 years ago?
revelette
 
  2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:19 am
@Val Killmore,
The administration ignored the warnings up to 9/11/1001, because who could have predicted the terrorist would "hijacked airplane as a missile."

Quote:
Now the White House has finally relented to pressure from the 9/11 commissioners and released a somewhat less sanitized version of the report. As the New York Times reports, this version says that U.S. aviation officials were warned in 1998 that al-Qaida could “seek to hijack a commercial jet and slam it into a U.S. landmark.” The FAA was also warned in early 2001 that airport screeners weren’t up to the task of detecting weapons that might be taken onto planes, the report says.

The Times says the new information “follows the basic outline of what was already known about aviation failings, namely that the FAA had ample reason to suspect that al Qaida might try to hijack a plane yet did little to deter it.”


source
revelette
 
  3  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:22 am
@H2O MAN,
pathetic
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:25 am
@revelette,
revelette wrote:

pathetic


Yes you are.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:27 am
@revelette,
Everything which fails to seek the setting aside of the 2nd. is pathetic.
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:29 am
@spendius,


http://www.redstatereport.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Obama-Biden-Dumb-and-Dumber.jpg
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:45 am
@H2O MAN,
As they struck the right chord in the mass mind I suppose it goes without saying.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:47 am
@Joe Nation,
DrewDad
 
  3  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:48 am
@revelette,
Yeah, but if the people in the World Trade Center had been armed, the terrorists wouldn't have been able to crash the plane.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 09:49 am
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:

Yeah, but if the people in the World Trade Center had been armed, the terrorists wouldn't have been able to crash the plane.


Joe Biden believes that this is a true statement... must be a liberal thang.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 10:08 am
@Val Killmore,
Val Killmore wrote:

Hmmm and I wonder what went wrong seeing that 9/11 occurred.

So your motto is "If you can't be perfect then don't do anything"?
parados
 
  2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 10:12 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



I posted that it was the 1995 bombing for a reason and what
difference, at this point, does it make if it was more than 10 years ago?

Because changes were made in the ability of people to buy fertilizer without question or ID.
Funny thing is since those changes there haven't been too many bombings using those chemicals that became harder to buy anonymously.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 10:19 am
@parados,


How much fertilizer has Obama and his liberal media spread about 'assault rifles' and 'high capacity clips'?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 10:25 am
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/408495_10151408028625126_195750671_n.png
BillRM
 
  -1  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 10:27 am
@spendius,
Quote:
What were the chances? There are X number of droppings off of money at the bank drop box in the US every year. And there are Y numbers of persons who were attacked in the process. What's the chances?


Florida city is a very very high crime area of Florida and so his chances without that gun would have been very high indeed for being attack.

Second he was a very known person in that area and was known to own a bar so anyone seeing him headed for the bank after hours would had been able to figure out the reason.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  3  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 10:46 am
@DrewDad,
I feel SO much safer knowing that those people are armed to the teeth when they go down to the Wal-Mart.

These are the people who BillRM wants armed.

And takes no responsibility for what happens next to them or any of us.

Joe(the gun owners of America are responsible for the gun carnage.)Nation
parados
 
  2  
Thu 24 Jan, 2013 10:58 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:

https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/408495_10151408028625126_195750671_n.png

We don't allow citizens to carry guns near our President
We don't allow citizens to carry gun in our Congress
We don't allow citizens to carry gun at most sporting events.
We don't allow citizens to carry gun in our courts.

It seems we can't trust our citizens to carry guns in places with important people.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/04/2025 at 08:51:59