64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
parados
 
  4  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 08:56 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
Apparently you've forgotten the 1994 election. Americans don't like it when Democrats try to overthrow the Constitution.

The Democrats tried to overthrow the Constitution? Oh.. this must be your lack of evidence again and instead you rely on hyperbole.

1. When the party in control of Congress changes, it is not evidence of the other party trying to overthrow the Constitution.
2. You have no evidence of any act of Congress passed that was thrown out as unconstitutional. The ban on assault weapons was not overturned by the courts.
oralloy
 
  0  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 08:57 am
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:
Yes, you're so right. He could have built a nuke and nuked them.


Pretty much any bozo can make a bomb. This kid probably could have brewed nerve gas if he'd wanted to. And if he'd gone on a hacking rampage, he probably could have done more damage to US infrastructure than all the hackers in the Chinese military.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 08:58 am
@djjd62,
It's a good thing you are Canadian djjd because it's obvious you are anti-American since you don't support killing kids.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 08:59 am
@parados,
Quote:
Yes, and it probably couldn't happen today because of new rules put in place concerning fertilizer and rental trucks.


Oh all the farmers and suppliers have their tons of fertilizer under enough security to keep someone from taking a truck load at whim?

An rental trucks rules?

If you do not care about being found after the fact how does rental trucks rules interfere beside you can alway steal a truck for that matter.

Yes that attack could never never happen again......bullshit.
oralloy
 
  0  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 08:59 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
oralloy wrote:
Hardly hyperbole. The left hates America's freedom even more than Osama bin Laden did. That is why the left is always trying to overthrow our Constitution.

If anyone values their freedom even a little bit, it is vital that they make sure to vote only for Republicans from now on, because if they don't, they are going to wake up one day in a country that no longer has any freedom.


It is difficult for me to figure out if you were just trying to make a joke here or not!


Not. The Democrats are plotting a major assault on our Constitutional liberties. It's going to be a big struggle to save our Constitution from their depredations.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:01 am
@parados,
parados wrote:
By the way.... you forgot to mention that the President spoke about those lives and attended a memorial service for them.


He was only trying to gin up support for his plot to do away with our freedom.
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:05 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
Actually I'm surprised this kid used guns. I cannot imagine how someone like him got to a place where he'd even commit a massacre. But since he did get there, everyone is pretty lucky he stuck only to guns.


I think it is likely he wish to have fame and he knew that if he used any other means to killed those poor children but firearms the news coverage would be nowhere as great.

It is not the deaths/killings of 20 children that is driving this news coverage it the ability to use those sad deaths to try to drive anti gun laws.
parados
 
  2  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:06 am
@BillRM,
Yeah because farmers store tons of fertilizer that they don't use and wouldn't notice if it was missing. Rolling Eyes

Stealing a truck doesn't change anything. Failure to stop at weigh stations will still get you pulled over.

So, you are suggesting that tons of fertilizer and a rental truck could be stolen and there would be no response by law enforcement? A person would still be able to drive across country to a major metropolitan area without anyone the wiser. Maybe you should stop fondling your gun so much. It seems to be making your brain not work.
parados
 
  4  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:07 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

parados wrote:
By the way.... you forgot to mention that the President spoke about those lives and attended a memorial service for them.


He was only trying to gin up support for his plot to do away with our freedom.

Which plot was that oralloy? Are you sure your tin foil hat didn't prevent it from happening?

http://tucsoncitizen.com/hispanic-politico/files/2012/10/tin-foil-hat.jpg
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:08 am
@djjd62,
Quote:
i'm glad we have the restrictions we do, owning a long gun in Canada is actually pretty easy, hand guns not so much


An if you do not care about the law all it would take is a hacksaw to have a concealable and high power weapon,
parados
 
  2  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:09 am
@BillRM,
Sure if only a bridge had gone down or a levee had broken it wouldn't have got nearly the same news coverage. And which news cycle do you live in Bill?
parados
 
  3  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:12 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
i'm glad we have the restrictions we do, owning a long gun in Canada is actually pretty easy, hand guns not so much


An if you do not care about the law all it would take is a hacksaw to have a concealable and high power weapon,

Sure Bill. We all know you and mass murderers have the same ideas and intelligence. You don't need to keep reminding us.
spendius
 
  3  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:12 am
@oralloy,
Freedom is in the **** oralloy with silly sods like you going into bat for it.

The idea that you can capture the word and wear it on your chest as a badge of honour is an absurdity.

50 million kids becoming anxious in schools isn't freedom. It's stealing childhoods with incalculable consequences.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:13 am
@parados,
parados wrote:
The Democrats tried to overthrow the Constitution? Oh.. this must be your lack of evidence again and instead you rely on hyperbole.


Nonsense. I've already given you that evidence, over and over and over.



parados wrote:
1. When the party in control of Congress changes, it is not evidence of the other party trying to overthrow the Constitution.


True. But that particular change in control was brought about because of the strong reaction from the American people, who as it turned out did not like it very much when the Democrats tried to abolish American freedom.



parados wrote:
2. You have no evidence of any act of Congress passed that was thrown out as unconstitutional.


Irrelevant. I have irrefutable evidence that it IS unconstitutional.

And you know very well that I do. That is why you do all this bobbing and weaving. If you thought you had even a shot at establishing that assault weapons bans were legitimate, you'd be trying to make that argument.



parados wrote:
The ban on assault weapons was not overturned by the courts.


Yet.

Currently we're working on having the courts rule that everyone has the right to carry guns when they go about in public, even in our largest cities. That is almost done.

Not sure what is next on the agenda after that, but assault weapons bans should be struck off the books within the next ten years.
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:14 am
@parados,
Quote:
Sure if only a bridge had gone down or a levee had broken it wouldn't have got nearly the same news coverage. And which news cycle do you live in Bill?


Come on if those 20 children had been killed in a school bus accident on their way to that school it would had gotten only a brief mention in the national news and we all know it.
djjd62
 
  1  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:17 am
@BillRM,
if only it had been an accidental massacre
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:17 am
@parados,
Quote:
Sure Bill. We all know you and mass murderers have the same ideas and intelligence. You don't need to keep reminding us.


Mass killers in the US tend to be white and brighter then average and I do share that with them along with most of the posters on this website.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:22 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

Bullshit. It's called a civil society, and you've done your best to eradicate it.
Let each INDIVIDUAL attend to his own interests
and let "civil society" be damned.





David
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:23 am
@spendius,
Quote:
50 million kids becoming anxious in schools isn't freedom. It's stealing childhoods with incalculable consequences.


An that is due to the anti gun driven wall to wall day in and day out news coverage that have little to do with the deaths of 20 children but how they died.

This over the top news coverage is likely setting up other children future deaths as copycats take note of the fame they could have by using an assault rifle to kill kids.

oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 17 Dec, 2012 09:25 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
I think it is likely he wish to have fame and he knew that if he used any other means to killed those poor children but firearms the news coverage would be nowhere as great.


Not if he really was an Aspie like the news reports say. An Aspie would never think like that. The only thing I can think of is he must have been in a lot of emotional pain.



BillRM wrote:
It is not the deaths/killings of 20 children that is driving this news coverage it the ability to use those sad deaths to try to drive anti gun laws.


Yes. And that drives home the need for a strong response against the freedom haters next election.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 06:28:51