@spendius,
spendius wrote:oralloy wrote:It is better that we die than give up our freedom or our Constitution.
I am aware oralloy that a peaceable, law-abiding population of compassionate and caring people might not be able to maintain America's position in the world.
But a violent, testosterone laden, sea of conflicts of interest, disagreement, contradictions and confusion, however much it supports America's position in the world, which I will allow, will be responded to by other powerful nations.
It isn't about our position in the world. It's about our freedom.
spendius wrote:And the Constitution is a document which is precisely written to reduce the dangers of responding opponents albeit on what looks to us now a smaller scale but wouldn't have done to the participants. The antagonisms of the 13 states were their whole world.
The United Nations, which I presume you hate, is a Constitutional Convention on a world scale.
I don't hate them.
It would be OK to destroy the rest of the world in the defense of our freedom. But my willingness to see them destroyed doesn't mean I feel any hate for them.
spendius wrote:The convention working on a United States of Europe is in permanent session and has been since the late 1950s and with no end in sight. It has so many delegates that even the sod-busters are having an input.
Good for them. Is the EU going to become more closely knit then?
spendius wrote:You are on the wrong side of history.
3,000 thermonuclear warheads say my freedom isn't going anywhere.
spendius wrote:Your guns are a very serious economic liability.
Not really.
spendius wrote:And with 300 million in circulation in that sea of confusion, which gets more choppy by the day, they obviously make a strong case for there being a lot more.
What of the cost, medically, of the mass anxiety of such a situation. What of the engineering in the manufacture of guns which could be put to better use. Dialysis machines for example.
What use are guns?
It's fun to shoot them. Also they can defend against attackers.
spendius wrote:Surely tasers can be made lethal if they are switched to MAX. And sold at swap meets for $20.
To what end?
spendius wrote:Why would a disarmed population lead to a Police State?
Free people have the right to carry guns when they go about in public. A disarmed population would, by definition, not be free.
Whether it would be a police state, who knows.