64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
ehBeth
 
  4  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:22 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

izzythepush wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
The liberal press
is a misnomer. America has one of the most right wing Media outlets in the developed world.

Bullshit

Compared to yours it may or may not, but I'm not comparing it to yours.


ok - in comparison to what developed country's media is the U.S. mainstream media liberal?



Seriously - the entire U.S. political spectrum has skewed so far to the right over the past thirty to forty years, I think it would difficult for most Americans (including those who describe themselves as left of centre) to even recognize a centrist media outlet, let alone truly liberal.



(IMNSHO)
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:25 pm
@Joe Nation,
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:27 pm


The Obama victim disarmament proposal is unconstitutional and anti-American.
Nothing about Obama's victim disarmament plan supports life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:32 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
oralloy wrote:
It is better that we die than give up our freedom or our Constitution.


I am aware oralloy that a peaceable, law-abiding population of compassionate and caring people might not be able to maintain America's position in the world.

But a violent, testosterone laden, sea of conflicts of interest, disagreement, contradictions and confusion, however much it supports America's position in the world, which I will allow, will be responded to by other powerful nations.


It isn't about our position in the world. It's about our freedom.



spendius wrote:
And the Constitution is a document which is precisely written to reduce the dangers of responding opponents albeit on what looks to us now a smaller scale but wouldn't have done to the participants. The antagonisms of the 13 states were their whole world.

The United Nations, which I presume you hate, is a Constitutional Convention on a world scale.


I don't hate them.

It would be OK to destroy the rest of the world in the defense of our freedom. But my willingness to see them destroyed doesn't mean I feel any hate for them.



spendius wrote:
The convention working on a United States of Europe is in permanent session and has been since the late 1950s and with no end in sight. It has so many delegates that even the sod-busters are having an input.


Good for them. Is the EU going to become more closely knit then?



spendius wrote:
You are on the wrong side of history.


3,000 thermonuclear warheads say my freedom isn't going anywhere.



spendius wrote:
Your guns are a very serious economic liability.


Not really.



spendius wrote:
And with 300 million in circulation in that sea of confusion, which gets more choppy by the day, they obviously make a strong case for there being a lot more.

What of the cost, medically, of the mass anxiety of such a situation. What of the engineering in the manufacture of guns which could be put to better use. Dialysis machines for example.

What use are guns?


It's fun to shoot them. Also they can defend against attackers.



spendius wrote:
Surely tasers can be made lethal if they are switched to MAX. And sold at swap meets for $20.


To what end?



spendius wrote:
Why would a disarmed population lead to a Police State?


Free people have the right to carry guns when they go about in public. A disarmed population would, by definition, not be free.

Whether it would be a police state, who knows.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:35 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
NRA spits on the graves of Newtown massacre victims with release of mobile shoot-'em-up app for iPhone, iPad

National Rifle Association launched free game that could allow children to play target practice and pay to unlock more powerful weapons, including an assault weapon like the one used by Adam Lanza to kill 20 children and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14.

By Chelsia Rose Marcius , Erin Durkin AND Bill Hutchinson
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Monday, January 14, 2013

Ready, aim, misfire!

Exactly one month after the Newtown school massacre, the National Rifle Association has launched a free iPhone and iPad shooting game offering kids as young as 4 a chance to fire guns at coffin-shaped targets.

The free game “NRA: Practice Range” is offered on iTunes and allows would-be snipers to choose a weapon to fire at an indoor gun range, an outdoor range or for skeet shooting practice.

The free guns include a Beretta M-9 handgun, a Colt M-16 assault rifle with 15-round clip or a Mossberg 500 pump-action shotgun.

For 99 cents extra, players can “unlock” higher-capacity guns similar to one Adam Lanza used in the Sandy Hook massacre, including AK-47 assault rifles and an M-11 sniper rifles.
...

It’s “the most authentic experience possible,” the gamemakers said, touting its real-life gunshot sounds and arsenal of free weapons...

Critics immediately blasted the powerful gun lobby, especially since the NRA itself blamed violent video games for contributing to Lanza’s deadly Dec. 14 rampage at the Sandy Hook Elementary School....

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/nra-spits-graves-new-shoot-em-up-app-article-1.1240207#ixzz2I5XL12j8


Gee, oralloy, after being blasted all over the place, the frightened NRA caved to pressure and immediately raised the age on the game.
But that doesn't change the fact it's not a suitable game for 12 year olds either. And the timing in releasing it, couldn't be worse.
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/NY_DN-495x620.jpg

Quote:
NRA shooting game no longer for preschoolers, mobile app ups age recommendation from 4 to 12
January 15, 2013
Associated Press

WASHINGTON – A new shooting game for mobile devices tied to the National Rifle Association is no longer being labeled suitable for preschoolers. "NRA: Practice Range" changed its age recommendation Tuesday from 4 years and up to at least 12 years of age, with an added warning that the game depicts realistic violence.

The game was released after a top NRA executive, Wayne LaPierre, had blamed violent video games, not guns, for contributing to mass shootings. A progressive advocacy group, Courage Campaign, on Tuesday circulated an online petition asking Apple to drop the free mobile application from its store.

The NRA and MEDL Media, which developed the game, did not respond to calls seeking comment. Apple declined to comment.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/15/nra-shooting-game-no-longer-for-preschoolers-mobile-app-ups-age-recommendation/#ixzz2I5Smwj7L


The NRA is turning a lot of people off, because of the extremists who are running it, and because of hearing from people like you, who are their mindless obedient servants. That helps the gun control movement grow in strength.
Quote:
Scarborough Blasts NRA ‘Extremism’ That’s Offending Americans: ‘How Sick Are These People?’
by Meenal Vamburkar
January 15th, 2013

Joe Scarborough was back at it on Tuesday morning, continuing his ongoing criticism of the “extremists” who he believes have come to dominate the National Rifle Association. It’s a great organization that no longer represents its members, he said. “Their extremism is destroying them.”

“How sick is this?” Scarborough asked, pointing to the New York Daily News front page about the NRA’s new “practice range” iPhone app, which is approved for ages four and above. “How sick are these people that have commandeered the NRA and turned them into an extremist operation for survivalists and gun manufacturers?”

The MSNBC host sought to explain that the NRA has been a good organization, but has allowed itself to be “besmirched and diminished.” To back up his point, he noted a new poll that shows a majority of Americans (58 percent) favoring a ban on assault weapons. “Americans are deeply offended by the extremists running the NRA,” he asserted, adding that “we warned them,” but they haven’t listened....

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/scarborough-blasts-nra-extremism-thats-offending-americans-how-sick-are-these-people/



H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:40 pm
@firefly,


Did MSNBC mention this video game?

New video game from the left: ‘Bullet to the Head of the NRA’

An anonymous computer game developer has released a violent video game online called, “Bullet to the Head of the NRA,” which allows players to shoot the president of the National Rifle Association.

In his much-publicized speech on Dec. 21, Wayne LaPierre, the organization’s CEO, said, “Isn’t fantasizing about killing people as a way to get your kicks really the filthiest form of pornography?”




0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:41 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
oralloy wrote:
Everyone remember to vote all the gun banners out of office in 2014! The ultimate solution to the Freedom Haters is having all our politicians terrified of crossing the NRA!


It's just too bad for you guys that the number of people who think you're nutballs far exceeds the number of people dim enough to follow your lead.


Childish name-calling won't change the reality that the NRA's power to vote people out of office in rural districts is unstoppable.

And your new war on America's hunters and sportsmen will only make the NRA's voting power even greater. (Which sportsmen are you going after after you're done screwing over the duck hunters?)

That's why, if you care to take a glance at reality for a moment, the House Democrats are not planning to pass any unconstitutional ban on assault weapons, and they announced that fact just hours after the NRA first broke their silence a week after the shooting.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  -1  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:45 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
It is a hard task to make any changes in the constitution that can not be done unless there is a large scale conviction of the need by a very large percent of the American public by way of congress and the states.


That's the point Bill. To get the conviction.

I see the supporters of the half-baked measures being leaked as oralloy, H2O, Killmore and Bill in a tutu.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:46 pm
@spendius,
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/simgad/4535541835958554006
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  4  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:48 pm
http://www.davegranlund.com/cartoons/wp-content/uploads/color-Sec-amend-NRA.jpg
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  3  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:49 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
but you chiding me for "putdowns" is quite rich.


Really? Happy to do a content analysis on both our posting histories. But I'm sure most would agree it's unnecessary with our respective A2K histories. It's just in your online nature to be caustically dismissive of anyone who doesn't hold your world view and opinions - I don't even think you're aware of it usually.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:50 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I never suggested anything of the sort. I merely expressed MY opinion about the kind of person I think should not own guns.


Sure you did and I myself had been hostile in expressing my opinion concerning the GOP on this website and by your standard that should somehow reflected on my abilities to be a gun owner at least when they god forbid get back into power.

The punishment for expressing opinions in a hostile manner would be to be disarmed it would seems in your ideal world.
spendius
 
  2  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:51 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Anybody who doesn't know what unrealistic drivel that is should sue the authorities which are responsible for their education for wasting their time and imprisoning them without due process.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:54 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
In my opinion, if a person acts like an out-of-control, aggressive, angry,constantly hostile individual...that person is a delusional liberal democrat.


That made me laugh H2O.

0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 05:54 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
The NRA is turning a lot of people off, because of the extremists who are running it, and because of hearing from people like you, who are their mindless obedient servants. That helps the gun control movement grow in strength.

Quote:
Scarborough Blasts NRA ‘Extremism’ That’s Offending Americans: ‘How Sick Are These People?’
by Meenal Vamburkar
January 15th, 2013

Joe Scarborough was back at it on Tuesday morning, continuing his ongoing criticism of the “extremists” who he believes have come to dominate the National Rifle Association. It’s a great organization that no longer represents its members, he said. “Their extremism is destroying them.”


The Freedom Haters spew this sort of nonsense periodically. It's nonsense.

The NRA is fine, and the only people who object to the NRA are the sorts of vermin who belong at Guantanamo strapped to a waterboarding table.



Quote:
The MSNBC host sought to explain that the NRA has been a good organization, but has allowed itself to be “besmirched and diminished.” To back up his point, he noted a new poll that shows a majority of Americans (58 percent) favoring a ban on assault weapons. “Americans are deeply offended by the extremists running the NRA,” he asserted, adding that “we warned them,” but they haven’t listened.


The freak warned us? About what??

The Constitution protects our right to have assault weapons. If anyone doesn't like it, too bad for them.
hingehead
 
  3  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 06:00 pm
There's a Sandy Hook truthers movement?

Goddamn.
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/this_man_helped_save_six_children_is_now_getting_harassed_for_it/
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 06:06 pm
@hingehead,


There's a movement to disarm law abiding Americans?

Goddamn.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/15/obama-weighs-1-executive-actions-on-gun-control/
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 06:07 pm
@BillRM,
What about people who have an Order of Protection lodged against them?

Should they be allowed to purchase a gun?

Do you know how often guns are used to shoot the partner or spouse in an act of domestic violence--and that spouse/partner victim is usually female.
Quote:
Number of U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan and Iraq: 6,614:

Number of women, in the same period, killed as the result of domestic violence in the US: 11,766

Increase in likelihood that a woman will die a violent death if a gun in present in the home: 270 percent
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/soraya-chemaly/50-actual-facts-about-dom_b_2193904.html


Quote:
Access to firearms yields a more than five-fold increase in risk of intimate partner homicide when considering other factors of abuse, according to a recent study, suggesting that abusers who possess guns tend to inflict the most severe abuse on their partners.

Jacquelyn C. Campbell et al., Risk Factors For Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results From A Multi-Site Case Control Study, 93 Am. J. of Public Health 1089, 1092 (2003), abstract available at http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/93/7/1089

Of females killed with a firearm, almost two-thirds were killed by their intimate partners. The number of females shot and killed by their husband or intimate partner was more than three times higher than the total number murdered by male strangers using all weapons combined in single victim/single offender incidents in 2002.

The Violence Pol'y Ctr., When Men Murder Women: An Analysis of 2002 Homicide Data: Females Murdered by Males in Single Victim/Single Offender Incidents, at 7 (2004), available at http://www.vpc.org/studies/wmmw2004.pdf

http://www.americanbar.org/groups/domestic_violence/resources/statistics.html
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  2  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 06:07 pm
@mysteryman,
Quote:
Frank, I hate to agree with bill, but he is correct.
If the simple rules of gun safety are followed, a firearm cannot hurt you.


Obviously. A firearm is an inanimate object. It is the presence of firearms in such numbers that is the subject of the debate. Not the firearms.

A firearm can't hurt a fly.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Tue 15 Jan, 2013 06:10 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Finn since no one has talked about banning all shotguns or all pistols or all long rifles.


I have Bill. And if they were all banned your other point would be moot.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.04 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 09:31:12