@oralloy,
Quote:It is better that we die than give up our freedom or our Constitution.
I am aware oralloy that a peaceable, law-abiding population of compassionate and caring people might not be able to maintain America's position in the world.
But a violent, testosterone laden, sea of conflicts of interest, disagreement, contradictions and confusion, however much it supports America's position in the world, which I will allow, will be responded to by other powerful nations.
And the Constitution is a document which is precisely written to reduce the dangers of responding opponents albeit on what looks to us now a smaller scale but wouldn't have done to the participants. The antagonisms of the 13 states were their whole world.
The United Nations, which I presume you hate, is a Constitutional Convention on a world scale. The convention working on a United States of Europe is in permanent session and has been since the late 1950s and with no end in sight. It has so many delegates that even the sod-busters are having an input.
You are on the wrong side of history.
Your guns are a very serious economic liability. And with 300 million in circulation in that sea of confusion, which gets more choppy by the day, they obviously make a strong case for there being a lot more.
What of the cost, medically, of the mass anxiety of such a situation. What of the engineering in the manufacture of guns which could be put to better use. Dialysis machines for example.
What use are guns? Anxiety is a bad thing from a physiological point of view. And with armed guards in schools the toddlers are getting a full in the face dose of it.
Your side's posts are laden with anxiety stimulation.
Surely tasers can be made lethal if they are switched to MAX. And sold at swap meets for $20.
Why would a disarmed population lead to a Police State? I think these half-baked compromises I hear are in the air are much more likely to lead to that. Background checks being just another method of collecting data and only a fool would think they would not become corrupt. Ms Lanza would clear that hurdle with ease.
And identifying "at risk" citizens is pure Police State stuff. Then "the people" has lost all real meaning. It morphs into "our friends". Which soon becomes a Party.
Anyway--how many killings per 100,000 gun owners are there compared with killings by non-gun owners?