64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
McTag
 
  3  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 03:36 am
@oralloy,

Quote:
Why are freedom haters so childish when they are prevented from violating people's civil rights?


Freedom is good.
Freedom to easily kill large numbers of one's fellow citizens is not good.

The right to life is the most important human right, is it not?
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 04:26 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

If not, I also notice that "gun collecting" is accepted as a valid reason for purchasing any gun on that chart.

If they are truly not allowed to say self defense, all they need to do is say it'll be part of their gun collection. Problem solved.
Well, if you say so - you must know it. I'd always thought gun collectors would collect guns.

Of course, you can get weapons for self defence, in Switzerland as well as in any other European country. (That, why some member of private security are armed.)
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 04:30 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Have you asked them what the response would be if someone wrote down as a reason: "protecting my family from burglars" ?
Actually, I don't think that some one would get the idea to write such: everyone knows that burglars can't legally "defended" with guns - that's why all the (here: Swiss) police departments have specialists for prevention:
Quote:
http://i48.tinypic.com/3136k29.jpg
Ziel der Kriminalprävention

Mit geeigneten Massnahmen der Kriminalität entgegenwirken, damit mögliche Risiken erst gar nicht entstehen.

Zur Vorbeugung von rechtswidrigen Taten bieten wir Beratungen und Referate an.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 04:39 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
oralloy wrote:
If not, I also notice that "gun collecting" is accepted as a valid reason for purchasing any gun on that chart.

If they are truly not allowed to say self defense, all they need to do is say it'll be part of their gun collection. Problem solved.


Well, if you say so - you must know it.


Look at those two "form" images you posted a short time ago. "Gun collecting" was one of the three purposes that did not require a further detailed statement was it not?

Also:
http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/514_54/a8.html

"Die Person, die den Waffenerwerbsschein für eine Feuerwaffe nicht zu Sport-, Jagd- oder Sammelzwecken beantragt, muss den Erwerbsgrund angeben."
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 04:42 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:
Freedom is good.
Freedom to easily kill large numbers of one's fellow citizens is not good.

The right to life is the most important human right, is it not?


That's why we have laws that severely punish murderers.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 04:45 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Actually, I don't think that some one would get the idea to write such: everyone knows that burglars can't legally "defended" with guns - that's why all the (here: Swiss) police departments have specialists for prevention:


Are people expected to just stand by and let criminals kill their families?

Self defense is a universal human right.
McTag
 
  3  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 04:55 am
@oralloy,

Quote:
That's why we have laws that severely punish murderers.


Although prevention is always better than cure.
spendius
 
  3  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:01 am
@JTT,
Quote:
Are there any Americans who do [avoid reality] this besides the gun folk?


There are actually JT. I won't say who they are because it would involve things that are better left unsaid. You'll find them in some of the best literature but they are usually slipped in so that we might nearly miss them.

Your style of invective does not mean that you are the only one who notices the horrors or are the only one they upset. It does alienate some people though.

Life is not very nice really. But it is improving a little I think.

There are no easy answers. Some bad things might be necessary to do good.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:08 am
@McTag,
You're wasting your time talking to that moron, he's an unthinking drone who parrots his superior's words. When he talks about freedom it's like a blind man talking about rainbows, he has no real concept of the word only what he's been told to think.

The real safeguard to freedom is the ballot box, not the gun. Meanwhile the real threat to freedom goes unnoticed.

Quote:
So now we have it: what appears to be hard, irrefutable evidence of Rupert Murdoch's ultimate and most audacious attempt – thwarted, thankfully, by circumstance – to hijack America's democratic institutions on a scale equal to his success in kidnapping and corrupting the essential democratic institutions of Great Britain through money, influence and wholesale abuse of the privileges of a free press.
In the American instance, Murdoch's goal seems to have been nothing less than using his media empire – notably Fox News – to stealthily recruit, bankroll and support the presidential candidacy of General David Petraeus in the 2012 election.


<br /> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/20/bernstein-murdoch-ailes-petreaus-presidency?INTCMP=SRCH
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:28 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:
oralloy wrote:
That's why we have laws that severely punish murderers.


Although prevention is always better than cure.


That's why free people have the right to carry handguns when they go about in public.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:28 am
@izzythepush,

*PLONK*
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:46 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Self defense is a universal human right.
Indeed. And that's why the Swiss got, and the Germans, French, British ...
We do, however, differ between self defence an murder.
Like the definition in English/Welsh law, other laws in civilised countries have a similar description:
Quote:
A defendant is entitled to use reasonable force to protect himself, others for whom he is responsible and his property. It must be reasonable.


The German law says that it must be "an adequate means to avert the danger".
The Swiss law uses similar words.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  4  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:48 am
@oralloy,

Quote:
That's why free people have the right to carry handguns when they go about in public.


An example of more of your twisted thinking. You know from your extensive researches that people who possess guns are more likely to harm themselves and others that those who do not.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:48 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
Are people expected to just stand by and let criminals kill their families?
No. But you wrote about "burglars" in your above response and not about a deadly attack on families.
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 05:55 am
@izzythepush,
Does it not bother you izzy that your quote contains the expressions " appears to be" and " seems to have been"?

There is no freedom. It's a myth. A conceit. Nor does any sensible person want freedom. That the ballot box is a safeguard for freedom is a pipe dream.
spendius
 
  3  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 06:16 am
@izzythepush,
oralloy uses the expression "freedom hating" in the fond belief it makes him fireproof. It really is very silly. It borders on baby talk.

There are 3 justifications for guns--

1--A sexual fetish to do with control.

2--Self protection.

3--A business proposition.

No 2 is hard to argue with in a country awash with guns. Only a complete gun ban with punitive sanctions can go near addressing the problem and that is only a partial solution.

Those arguing for bans on this and that are wasting their time. It's sticking plaster mush.

If I lived in the US I would be packing. I wouldn't like it and if a vote on a complete ban was taken I would vote for it even if there was no buy-back scheme on offer.

It isn't just burglars. It's ruthless determined burglars.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 06:39 am
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Does it not bother you izzy that your quote contains the expressions " appears to be" and " seems to have been"?


Not as much as the fact that this whole exercise has been unreported by the so called 'Liberal Media,' in America at least.
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 06:43 am
@Joe Nation,
Quote:
You are correct, there is a peculiar avoidance of actually looking at how deeply the gun culture has infected America. There is a refusal to accept any responsibility beyond one's own front porch by gun owners for the carnage that their myopic and selfish attitudes cause. Cause is the right word. The thousands of unnecessary deaths in America from gunshots are their fault.


Quote:
January 1, 2013
At the E.R., Bearing Witness to Gun Violence
By DAVID H. NEWMAN

THERE is an unspoken rule in medicine: we do not tell tales out of school.

As an emergency room physician, an Army veteran who was deployed to a combat support hospital in Baghdad in 2005, and a biomedical researcher in the field of cardiac-arrest resuscitation, I have been and am, on a daily basis, a witness to grave misfortune. Ordinarily, though, except for medical purposes, I will not discuss what I have seen.

Last week a colleague asked me to make an exception. The father of two young children, he was moved by the rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., to ask his professional circle to reconsider our silence. I am an expectant father, and his words resonated with me. They reminded me that we doctors are at the front lines of the scourge of gun violence, and that to remain silent as this threat to public health continues unabated would be no different than for an oncologist or a cardiologist to stay mum on the dangers of smoking.

The doctor’s balance between discretion and education is complex. But the news from Newtown, and my colleague’s request, convinced me that we have reached the threshold. I can no longer stay silent.

Here is just some of what I have seen over the years. In Baghdad, I saw a 5-year-old girl who was shot in the head while in her car seat. Her father, who knew she was dying before I said it, wept in my arms, as bits of her body clung to his shirt.

Much of the gun violence I have seen, though, I have seen on home soil, here in the United States. There was a 9-year-old girl, shot in the chest by an assault rifle during a “drive-by” gang shooting, in a botched retaliation for a shooting earlier that day. She was baffled, and in pain, with a gaping hole under her collarbone.

I have also seen an 8-year-old who found a shotgun in the closet while playing with a friend. The two boys pointed the weapon at each other a number of times before the gun accidentally discharged. The 8-year-old arrived in my emergency department with most of his face blown off. Miraculously, he survived.

Another child I will never forget was a 13-year-old who was shot twice in the abdomen by an older boy who mistook him for one of a group that had bullied and berated him a week earlier. Slick with sweat and barely conscious, he groaned and turned to look at me. Soon after, he died in the operating room. His mother arrived minutes later, wide-eyed and breathless.

I do not know exactly what measures should be taken to reduce gun violence like this. But I know that most homicides and suicides in America are carried out with guns. Research suggests that homes with a gun are two to three times more likely to experience a firearm death than homes without guns, and that members of the household are 18 times more likely to be the victim than intruders.

I know that in 2009, the most recent year for which data is available, nearly 400 American children (age 14 and under) were killed with a firearm and nearly 1,000 were injured. That means that this week we can expect 26 more children to be injured or killed with a firearm.


Emergency rooms are themselves volatile environments, not immune to violence. Over the last decade, a quarter of gun crimes in American E.R.’s were committed with guns wrested from armed guards.

I have sworn an oath to heal and to protect humans. Guns, invented to maim and destroy, are my natural enemy.

Sally Cox, a school nurse in Newtown, told Scott Pelley of “60 Minutes” that when state troopers led her out of the school after the mass shooting they instructed her to cover her eyes. This was humane, and right. But some of us see every day what no one should, ever. If the carnage remains undiscussed, we risk complacency about an American epidemic — one that is profoundly difficult, but necessary, to watch, and to confront. That is why I bear witness.

David H. Newman is the director of clinical research in the department of emergency medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/opinion/at-the-er-bearing-witness-to-gun-violence.html?hp


You are right, Joe, and the most vocal gun owners that are posting in this thread, are discussing everything but how deeply the gun culture has infected America, or the issue of the thousands of unnecessary deaths caused every year in this country from gunshots.

If they are at all typical of gun owners in general, it paints a rather dismal portrait of that group as either hopelessly mired in ignorance, and/or so deeply wedded to self-interest and violence, and so essentially lacking in any civic (or moral) responsibility, that they can't even recognize, or bother to care about, the gun carnage that afflicts this country. They are not only like the cigarette smokers who don't care if their second-hand smoke damages other people, these are the ones who blow their harmful smoke right in your face.
spendius
 
  0  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 07:26 am
@izzythepush,
Going from " appears to be" and "seems to have been" to "this whole exercise" is what the Groanbox intended you to do and imo that is as bad as anything Mr Murdoch appears to have done or seems to have been doing.

His biggest mistake was to appoint an obvious counter-jumping Jezebel to a position of great responsibility.

His Sky News, Sky Sports and Sky Arts are great achievements.
JTT
 
  -1  
Wed 2 Jan, 2013 07:30 am
@firefly,
Quote:
You are right, Joe, and the most vocal gun owners that are posting in this thread, are discussing everything but how deeply the gun culture has infected America, or the issue of the thousands of unnecessary deaths caused every year in this country from gunshots.

If they are at all typical of gun owners in general, it paints a rather dismal portrait of that group as either hopelessly mired in ignorance, and/or so deeply wedded to self-interest and violence, and so essentially lacking in any civic (or moral) responsibility, that they can't even recognize, or bother to care about, the gun carnage that afflicts this country. They are not only like the cigarette smokers who don't care if their second-hand smoke damages other people, these are the ones who blow their harmful smoke right in your face.


And you can't see how stunning is your hypocrisy, Firefly? [Obviously, not yours alone.]

Change a few words and ...

You are right, Joe, and the most vocal Americans that are posting in this thread, are discussing everything but how deeply American governments have infected America with international terrorism and war criminal activities, or the issue of the millions of unnecessary deaths caused by this country from those actions.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 07:30:38