64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
spendius
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:04 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Keep in mind that a fair degree of precision is usually desired.


I hope you don't think I didn't know that.

Quote:
Well, I for one have no idea.


So it is not ruled out then?
spendius
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:09 pm
@spendius,
We might arrive at the position that if nothing effective is forthcoming Mr Obama's speech at the Memorial Service was designed to make him look good whilst he sold a few thousand more assault weapons.

That's quite a hole for a man to have dug for himself imo. A PM here who didn't climb out of it would resign.
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:13 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Propaganda? There are dead children as the result of guns.


Look no guns needed of any kind.............

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Kehoe

Andrew Philip Kehoe (February 1, 1872 – May 18, 1927) was an American farmer and treasurer of his township school board, notable as a mass murderer for killing his wife, and 43 other people (including 38 children), and injuring 58 people by setting off bombs in the Bath School Disaster on May 18, 1927. He committed suicide near the school by detonating dynamite in his truck, causing an explosion which killed several other people and wounded more. He had earlier set off incendiary devices in his house and farm, destroying all the buildings, as well as two horses and other animals.

He is the first suicide bomber, and first suicide car bomber, in world history.

0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:16 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
he sold a few thousand more assault weapons
.

My bet would be at least a 100,ooo more such weapons.

0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:21 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
A PM here who didn't climb out of it would resign.


The sad sad part, Spendi, is that PMs in the UK and prezes in the US don't resign, and aren't held to account for serious things like committing crimes against humanity.
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:27 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
A police with a gun in his holster will not be able to protect anyone; including himself from somebody with a rifle with scope


A rifle with a scope inside a building?

Or are you talking about a sniper outside of the school picking off people leaving or arriving at the school?

More then likely you are blowing smoke and the killer in this case we been talking about and in most similar cases picked places where armed security is not around and when the police do show up they tend to killed themselves not fight it out.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:31 pm
@JTT,
So today we have in the news a guy who likely killed his sister, set his house on fire, then sat up on a berm to kill the responding firemen...does this mean we should outlaw matches, lighter fluid and single shot guns?

Maybe instead of focusing on tools that can be put to evil use we should instead focus on finding and fixing those who want to do evil...or can't resist doing evil?


Just a crazy idea worth putting out there!
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:45 pm
@hawkeye10,
Okay, hawk, round up all the crazies in this country - to make us all "safe."

You ******* idiot!
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Okay, hawk, round up all the crazies in this country - to make us all "safe."

You ******* idiot!

Enforcing the standards of humanity is good common sense..sure, those who refuse to conform to basic standards such as don't kill you fellow men should be rounded up and put away till they are ready to not be a threat to the collective.

These people are many orders of magnitude more dangerous then are the ones who like to have sex with 16 yo's or apply a little force in their sex, but these who are ready to blow us away get no attention where as the pervs get hounded and locked up for extended periods. We have no sense of sensible risk management or proportion.
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:52 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Okay, hawk, round up all the crazies in this country - to make us all "safe."

You ******* idiot!


Talk about ******* idiot and rounding people and things up the idea of rounding up 300 millions firearms or even many millions of so call assualt rifles is even more funny.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 06:59 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
We have no sense of sensible risk management or proportion.


True............
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:05 pm
@hawkeye10,
Your so-called solution isn't that simple to implement. Think of the why's.
0 Replies
 
Val Killmore
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:12 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

@reply all

Today's senseless tragedy due to guns...

Quote:
Two firefighters shot dead in upstate New York
By Catherine E. Shoichet and Chuck Johnston, CNN
Mon December 24, 2012

(CNN) -- At least two firefighters were shot and killed at the scene of a fire that engulfed multiple houses in upstate New York on Monday, police said.

Doctors treated two other firefighters for gunshot wounds, police in Webster, New York, told reporters.

Authorities believe one or more shooters took aim at the firefighters after they left their vehicles, Police Chief Gerald Pickering said.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo described it as a "horrific shooting" and a "senseless act of violence."

"Volunteer firefighters and police officers were injured and two were taken from us as they once again answered the call of duty," he said in a statement.

It was unclear whether there were any suspects.

"We have different individuals that were possible people with knowledge, but at this point I can't really comment," Monroe County Sheriff Patrick O'Flynn told reporters.

For hours, the gunfire stopped firefighters from working to extinguish the flames and forced police SWAT teams to evacuate homes in the area.

Firefighters first arrived before 6 a.m., said Rob Boutillier, Webster's fire marshal. By 9 a.m., flames had engulfed three houses and a vehicle, he said.

"It's still an active crime scene," Pickering said. "We have firefighters there at the location. It took a while to make it safe ... to put out the fires."

Doctors were treating the wounded firefighters Monday morning, said Teri D'Agostino, a spokeswoman for Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York. They were in guarded condition, she said.

One firefighter escaped from the scene in his own vehicle about an hour after he was shot, then was taken to the hospital by an ambulance from another location, Boutillier said.

Another wounded firefighter was conscious and speaking when he was removed from the scene, Boutillier said.

The shooting comes amid a renewed debate over gun control in the United States after a gunman killed 26 people at a Connecticut elementary school earlier this month.

President Barack Obama has set a January deadline for "concrete proposals" to deal with gun violence.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, has said she will introduce legislation to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004. The White House has said that the president supports that effort.

Speaking to reporters on Friday, the National Rifle Association's president called for more guns in the wake of the mass shooting, proposing putting an armed guard in every U.S. school in order to protect children.

On Sunday, NRA President Wayne LaPierre told NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would not express support for any new gun restrictions, saying most gun laws on the books are currently rarely enforced.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/24/us/new-york-firefighters-shooting/?hpt=us_c1


America is the land of senseless gun violence.


Facts are not naive, your assessment of them are. Statistically, we are living in the least violent time in US history. This is a fact, a modicum of research would be required to see that. But you see sensational stories on the news and overestimate their occurrence. This is a cognitive bias called the availability heuristic. The overwhelming majority of firearms in the hands of civilians in the US will never ever be used to commit a crime or harm another person. This is a statistical fact. You can argue with it, but you would be wrong.
Highly emotional states are not conducive to rational arguments. You can’t blame oralloy or H2Oman or NRA for people’s free will and committing crime. Or at least if you’re going to be consistent, drunk driving kills almost twice as many people in the US than gun related murders, so when can I expect you to start blaming drivers, or members of AAA, or automobile manufacturers every time there is a news story about car accidents and accidents by DUI?

All your anti-gun talk is going to get people hurt if they actually pass the AWB especially when the minority criminals get bold and the MAJORITY can't defend themselves adequately.
0 Replies
 
Val Killmore
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:13 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Okay, hawk, round up all the crazies in this country - to make us all "safe."

You ******* idiot!


It is Christmas eve dude. Is that your way of embracing your true holiday spirit?
Val Killmore
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:13 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Quote:
Sure they do: Enact proper defenses.

How were those volunteer firemen---one of whom was a policemen--supposed to protect themselves from that killer?

These deaths were as horrible as those of the children--these are the people who dedicate themselves to helping and protecting the rest of us.

We have mass shootings going on regularly--and it is insane not to better regulate and control firearms. The more guns there are, the easier it becomes for anyone to get their hands on one. The man who murdered these fireman was not only a convicted felon, he apparently had a long history of mental illness.

There should be a way of tracing the ownership of all guns.


We don't have mass shootings regularly, suggesting that we do is a damn lie. Sixty two mass shooting since 1982. Around 18 mass shootings in Europe since 2000.

Mass public public shootings are exceedingly rare events firefly, but they attract massive news attention, and produce misperceptions, as you've done when saying mass shootings happen regularly. Europeans can look down on America with their nose in their air saying public shootings are such an American problem, when there are attacks in their own countries. This is not an American problem, it is a universal problem, but with a common factor: The attacks occur in public places where civilians are banned from carrying guns.

Quote:

Zug, Switzerland, Sept. 27, 2001: A man whose lawsuits had been denied murdered 14 members of a cantonal parliament.

Tours, France, Oct. 29, 2001: Four people were killed and ten wounded when a French railway worker started shooting at a busy intersection.

Nanterre, France, March 27, 2002: A man killed eight city-council members after a council meeting.

Erfurt, Germany, April 26, 2002: A former student killed 18 at a secondary school.

Freising, Germany, Feb. 19, 2002: Three people killed and one wounded.

Turin, Italy, Oct. 15, 2002: Seven people killed on a hillside overlooking the city.


Madrid, Spain, Oct. 1, 2006: A man killed two employees and wounded another at a company that had fired him.

Emsdetten, Germany, Nov. 20, 2006: A former student murdered eleven people at a high school.

Tuusula, Finland, Nov. 7, 2007: Seven students and the principal killed at a high school.

Naples, Italy, Sept. 18, 2008: Seven dead and two seriously wounded in a public meeting hall. (This incident is not included in the totals given below because it may have involved the Mafia.)

Kauhajoki, Finland, Sept. 23, 2008: Ten people shot to death at a college.

Winnenden, Germany, March 11, 2009: A 17-year-old former student killed 15 people, including nine students and three teachers.

Lyon, France, March 19, 2009: Ten people injured when a man opened fire on a nursery school.

Athens, Greece, April 10, 2009: Three people killed and two injured by a student at a vocational college.

Rotterdam, Netherlands, April 11, 2009: Three people killed and one injured at a crowded café.

Vienna, Austria, May 24, 2009: One dead and 15 wounded in an attack on a Sikh temple.

Espoo, Finland, Dec. 31, 2009: Four people shot to death at a mall.

Cumbria, England, June 2, 2010: Twelve killed by a British taxi driver.
0 Replies
 
Val Killmore
 
  -2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:14 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

Go back and read your statements Val. You misrepresented DrewDad's argument by stating he wanted to ban all guns. THEN you attempted to refute the argument you made up but attributed to DrewDad by using an analogy.
Your analogy was the refutation NOT the misrepresentation.

http://able2know.org/topic/203766-80#post-5203650
Val Killmore wrote:

DrewDad wrote:

The suggestion that we need "more good guys with guns"(Actual argument by LaPierre) is like suggesting the Titanic should hit another iceberg, but on the other side of the ship.(Analogy that attempts to refute LaPierre's argument)



The suggestion that we should ban guns in America (Drew Dad never made such an argument so the straw man basis)is like suggesting ships should be banned from sailing the seas after the Titanic crashed into an iceberg and sank.(The analogy attempts to refute an argument never made so completes the strawman fallacy.)


Now, unless you want to argue that LaPierre never made the statement that we need more good guys with guns there is no straw man in DrewDad's laying out the opponents argument and then refutation with an analogy. You can't argue that the analogy misrepresents the argument by LaPierre since it clearly is based on the argument that LaPierre DID make.


parados wrote:
DrewDad wrote:

The suggestion that we need "more good guys with guns"(Actual argument by LaPierre) is like suggesting the Titanic should hit another iceberg, but on the other side of the ship.(Analogy that attempts to refute LaPierre's argument)


You think that analogy refutes LaPierre's argument? Man, do I have to go over this with you step by step.
The conclusion "Titanic should hit another iceberg, but on the other side of the ship" does not follow from the premise that we need "more good guys with guns." Therefore, it is an invalid argument, in the first place. It's like saying If there are more good guys with guns there will be less mass shootings. Then saying that more good guys with guns is like saying America should have another mass shooting tragedy. ("suggesting the Titanic should hit another iceberg, but on the other side of the ship."). The conclusion doesn't follow from the premise, the conclusion is just an automatic gainsaying of what LaPierre said. Now the straw man comes in when drewdad equates the two ("is like suggesting"), and gainsayer drewdad summarized LaPierre's ideas with his analogy to parody it. That gainsaying parody was a misrepresentation of LaPierre's original idea. Drewdad parodying LaPierre's nature of position allowed drewdad to simultaneously misrepresent it, and by doing so, making that position seem especially vulnerable or baseless. Thus the analogy by drewdad is definitely a strawman relative to LaPierre's idea.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:49 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
we should instead focus on finding and fixing those who want to do evil...or can't resist doing evil?

Now you advocate rounding up, and putting away, people who haven't yet committed a crime or broken a law?

Once people break a law, then you can arrest them, but not before that.

What kind of dictatorship are you advocating?

Quote:
those who refuse to conform to basic standards such as don't kill you fellow men should be rounded up and put away till they are ready to not be a threat to the collective.

We already have that solution, Hawkeye--it's called prison. And we only put people in prison after they have done something to violate the law.







BillRM
 
  2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:57 pm
@firefly,
Obama is doing a wonderful job of selling so call assault rifles and adding to the 5 to 10 millions already out there.

Hell I feel almost like going out and picking one up even those I really have no desire for one but Obama is one hell of a sale person.

Talk about priming the ecconomic with consumer demands.



http://abcnews.go.com/US/assault-weapons-ban-talk-sparks-run-gun-stores/story?id=18051781


The National Rifle Association may still get its way and defeat the lawmakers calling for a ban on the sale of assault ridles, but some gun store owners say it seems their customers aren't taking any chances.

"We have never seen anything like this," said Larry Hyatt, who owns a gun shop in Charlotte, N.C. "We have the Christmas business, the hunting season business, and now we have the political business.

"We have seen a lot of things, but we have never seen anything like this, this is probably four times bigger than the last time we saw a big rush," he said.

Some of the customers in his store said it is the talk of stricter gun control in the wake of the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., that is driving the rush.

"The way they are trying to approach it, they are just making people who have never thought about buying a gun, now they want to come in here and buy a gun," one customer said.

At NOVA Firearms in Falls Church, Va., there have been "skyrocketing" sales following the Newtown shooting, chief firearms instructor Chuck Nesby said.

"They've been off the charts. Absolutely skyrocketing," Nesby said. "If I could give an award to President Obama and Senator Feinstein would be sales persons of the year."

He was referring to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who said she will introduce an assault weapons ban in January.

Sales are up 400 percent, he said.

"We're completely out of the so-called assault weapons, semi automatic firearms that are rifles," Nesby said. "Forty percent of those sales went to women and senior citizens. We can't get them now. Everybody, nationwide is out of them the sales have just been off the charts nationwide."

firefly
 
  2  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:59 pm
@BillRM,
Just shows you how flaming paranoid the gun nuts are.

I wonder how many future mass murderers might be among them?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 08:04 pm
@Val Killmore,
**** the Christmas eve; I'm an atheist. At least I'm not promoting guns like you crazies that kill children, policemen, and firemen.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.79 seconds on 02/01/2025 at 04:44:45