Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

A life sentence for the crime of solely possessing child pornography would seem to be excessive. A life sentence is what we give first-degree murderers, and possession of child pornography is not the equivalent of first-degree murder.

I disagree, most of us can see a situation in which we might have to kill another human being. None of us, (except for pathetic inadequates like you and the dribbler) could see a situation in which we would abuse a child. If the nonce is locked up it's not abusing kids. Children matter, nonces don't.

Still, the arrest of 151 people is a troublingly high number of sexual deviates who are contributing to the abuse of all those children,
in all those images, that these creeps use for masturbation.

Lock them all up!

The only people redefining rape are rapist nonces like you. You should be thankful that the law allows a pathetic lowlife nonce like you to spread your sick filth. People who abuse children are low life pieces of ****, and apologists like you are no better, you should all be castrated and branded. You're not a freedom fighter you're a sad little man.

the US government makes all new law for sex crimes, law that is nether consistent with the rest of law nor with the Constitution.

According to the Mayo Clinic of the U.S.A., studies and case reports indicate that 30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child, however they note that it is difficult to know how many people progress from computerized child pornography to physical acts against children and how many would have progressed to physical acts without the computer being involved.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography

By the mid-1980's, the trafficking of child pornography within the United States had been almost completely eradicated through a series of successful campaigns waged by law enforcement. Child pornographers had become lonely and hunted individuals. Producing child abuse images was both difficult and expensive, and reproducing images was equally difficult and expensive. Purchasing and trading such images was extremely risky. Anonymous distribution and receipt was not possible and it was difficult for pedophiles to find and interact with each other. Unfortunately, technology has changed the situation.

Producing child abuse images has now become easy and inexpensive. The Internet allows images and digitized movies to be reproduced and disseminated to tens of thousands of individuals at the click of a button. The distribution and receipt of such images can be done almost anonymously. As a result, child pornography is readily available through virtually every Internet technology (web sites, email, instant messaging/ICQ, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), newsgroups/bulletin boards, and peer-to-peer). The technological ease, lack of expense, and anonymity in obtaining and distributing child pornography has resulted in an explosion in the availability, accessibility, and volume of child pornography.

CEOS works with the 93 United States Attorney offices around the country and investigative agencies to vigorously combat this growing problem. By maintaining a coordinated, national-level law enforcement focus, including coordinating nationwide and international investigations and prosecutions, CEOS works to deter the production, distribution and possession of child pornography by aggressively investigating and prosecuting of these crimes. Additionally, CEOS works with law enforcement to identify victims used to produce child pornography with the goal of rescuing the victims and preventing continued abuse of these children.
http://www.justice.gov/criminal/ceos/childporn.html

Shoud we consider enacting federal legislation of severe penalties for masturbation

Meanwhile, I haven't heard you offer a single, well thought out legal strategy for addressing child pornography crimes, including the crime of possession

Most people do not regard the possession of child pornography as innocuous activity.

The images in child pornography are records of crimes commited against children.

That is fabulous, but in our system criminal activity is a crime against the state.

See ya.

No doubt I will after you take a breather and attempt to come up with a better argument for your position..."IT'S THE LAW!" is your stock answer when you dont have anything else, and against me that is never going to work. I am impervious to manipulation and bullying, as I long ago learned how to handle scum like you.

You're the bullying piece of scum. You hide behind the law when it suits you. If you want to live in the land of do as you please you need to know that cuts both ways, I want to castrate nonce pieces of **** like you, and I'm not alone in that. I've had more than my fair share of sexual encounters and I've never once been accused of rape, and neither have any of my mates. It's only pathetic little creeps like you, who need to subject women and children to sexual violence in order to feel like a man, who need to worry about that.

You're not a free thinker, or a freedom fighter, you're just a pathetic sexual inadequate who's too stupid to see what an insignificant dull little fuckwit you really are.

So stop boo-hooing about the big bad law, and be grateful that real man aren't allowed to dish out the justice you really deserve.

It is also quite laughable that the demented piece of **** would run his mouth about being a "real man", while cowering behind a phony avatar and nickname no one in the real world would ever call him. "Short Eyes" is more like it, and what we'd call him around here, and he'd do well to run the other way each and every time he encountered a "real man", who recognized him for what he is. Clearly, that is precisely what he's afraid of and the reason he spews his demented would-be bully bullshit while cowering in anonymity. Hawkeye pontificating about what it means to be a real man is like Jeffrey Dahmer pontificating about what it means to be a humanitarian. Anyone considering taking his advice should also consider he is seemingly universally despised by every woman on A2K.

While it's certainly true that the 25th guy who tells the "hot girl" she's pretty today has done nothing to separate himself from the previous 24, and that sometimes the cocky aggressiveness of a Neanderthal will be instinctually interpreted as an attractive strength, the idea that it has to be one or the other is absurd. At best, the caveman mentality suggested by Short Eyes could fool the least perceptive of women for a very short while, but only until she realized that his phony projection of strength was the false bravado of a demented coward.

The "real man", the one worth being or having is the gentle man who stands up only when necessary and never feels compelled to demonstrate his strength on a weaker being. Roughly the exact opposite of the rape-advocating coward running his mouth here.

The answer to the title question is absolutely. Any woman (or man for that matter) worth having will demand no less, and there is nothing inherently weak in being respectful or gentle.

Ps. On a lighter note: I'd pay a hundred dollars to watch CJ crack Short Eyes with a frying pan, each and every time until I ran out of money!

Why would I want to impress a sad pathetic, and let's not forget incredibly stupid, loser like you? I'm just letting you know how your sentiments go down in the real world. I'm not interested in impressing you in the same way that I'm not interested in impressing a cockroach.

communists[/color], during the Third World War??????
This is the spirit of antagonism that we shoud ALL have applied against THEM (housing, etc.), but I never saw much of that.





David

It looks like Bills advise to use technology to keep hard drives private are dashed to hell

The only people redefining rape are rapist nonces like you

Sorry but when a man can be charge and try for rape when a grown woman jump into his bed when he is asleep and begin having sex with him that is redefining the meaning of rape big time.