Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

I can see why he's giving BillRM such support, birds of a feather and all that.

don't have 10,000 women.

I am sure it will outsell fifty shades of gay.

..A Swedish man is fighting a heavy fine for possession of child pornography, after police seized 51 drawings from his collection of Japanese manga cartoons.

Simon Lundström, 39, who translates the comics for a living, appeared in Sweden’s Supreme Court today on the first day of his attempt to overturn a ruling last year when 39 of the 51 cartoons seized from his apartment were deemed as child pornography.

Japan’s manga cartoons, which are intended for adults, frequently feature violent and explicit sex, in which innocent young girls falling prey to demonic men.

A parrot is a lot more intelligent. Oralboy is pondlife

Oralboy is a twisted little misanthrope, with genocidal tendencies

and a very limited vocabulary.

Like you he's also into sexual violence

he's into sexual violence

and is obviously rather sad and inadequate.

If we're talking films, you two could make a reasonable fist of Planet Of The Apes, but you might need to have a shave first.

BillRM seems to find this sort of thing amusing...

Liar...liar...liar....you trash...you trash....you trash...liar...you trash...you trash...you trash...

She married someone else the day after your divorce was final.

None of the above apply to cartoons and the only argument for outlawing them is that they might encourage sexual abuse of real children.

Glouco man charged in porn case
Sep. 22, 2012

CAMDEN — A Gloucester County man, who has identified himself as a former Boy Scout leader, is accused of possessing child pornography.

Gerrett Conover, 47, of Woolwich, was arrested earlier this month as he crossed the border from Canada to the United States, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Jersey.

Conover allegedly was traveling with a laptop computer that held more than 50 images of child pornography, authorities said.

A later search of his home found at least 10 more images on additional computers and electronic devices, according to the federal prosecutor’s office.

Investigators identified Conover as a suspect after federal investigators in Boston discovered “various individuals” engaged in online chats about sexual abuse of children in 2010, the Attorney’s Office said. Investigators also found that Conover allegedly traded child pornography with at least one person involved in those chats.

Authorities alleged that in one online chat, Conover said he had a “close relationship” with a Boy Scout while the youth was 10 to 17 years old. He also allegedly said “he served as a Boy Scout leader and obtained access to the boy after Boy Scout meetings and during trips.”

Authorities also alleged that Conover discussed his activities in an online chat in November 2010.

“This is a boy I liked and vice versa, but he moved away,” Conover allegedly said, according to a federal complaint filed Thursday. “I gave him sneakers…I tried to keep him permanent…He was nearly perfect…”

Investigators also found “numerous materials allegedly establishing Conover’s involvement in the Boy Scouts” from 1990 to 2000. These included photographs of Conover in a Scout uniform and at scouting events, as well as a Boy Scouts Handbook.

A woman who answered the phone at the Boy Scouts’ Southern New Jersey Council declined to comment.

Leads from the Boston case have resulted in about 45 arrests and the identification of about 150 victimized youngsters, federal authorities said.

Conover was charged with importation or transportation of obscene matters and possession of child pornography after his Sept. 16 arrest in Ogdensburg, N.Y. He now faces an additional charge of receipt and distribution of child pornography.

An attorney for Conover could not be reached.
http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20120922/CRIME/309220028/Glouco-man-charged-porn-case

And that's not a sufficient reason?

Well, as you've noted, the material is illegal in the U.S. if it's received by electronic means, or by mail, etc. And it is illegal in the U.K. So, once again, you're just at odds with prevailing moral views of this material and how it should be treated in this country

Hell no not to take someone freedom away for years at great cost to the society for having such material that might or might not encourage someone at some time in the future to abuse a child!!!!!!!!!!!