I'll say it again, with terribly few exceptions, I find the idea of anybody ever being charged with any sort of a crime for owning something or having something (other than stolen property) in their possession, totally offensive.
Granted there may be things which a citizen should not be allowed to own, this is how high I would set the bar:
I would make the test be the question of whether Al Qaeda merely owning or possessing something would provoke our government to military action.
For instance, Al Qaeda or any terrorist group owning any of these items would or at least could provoke our government to action:
- Portable AA missiles such as our own stingers.
- Anthrax.
- Nuclear or thermonuclear weapons.
- Nerve gas.
- Mustard gas.
Likewise there is no rational reason for a citizen to own any of those things and the intentions of the 2'nd amendment can be met without anybody ever owning anything like that.
On the other hand, Al Qaeda could own any kind of individual firearms, any kind of alcoholic beverages, any normal kinds of drugs, any kinds of dirty pictures, any kinds of pesticides, any kinds of sexy clothing, any kinds of vehicles....
In no case would Al Qaeda owning any of that stuff provoke Uncle Sam to action and there is no reason why an American citizen owning any such should.