17
   

Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

 
 
firefly
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 05:40 pm
Like the person mentioned in the opening post of this thread, this is another college professor with child porn...
Quote:
Ex-Texas Wesleyan professor pleads guilty in child porn case
May. 23, 2012
By Domingo Ramirez Jr.

FORT WORTH -- A former Texas Wesleyan University professor who was accused of downloading and trading child pornography for the last 10 years pleaded guilty today to distributing it.

The professor, identified as Michael K. Gilbert, 29, of Fort Worth, will now be sentenced on Nov. 26 before U. S. District Judge Terry Means. He faces a maximum of 20 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine on the federal charge of distribution of child pornography.

Gilbert has been in custody since his arrest in early April.

His name was off the faculty list on the university website hours after his arrest.

An investigation of Gilbert began when an FBI agent, undercover and using a file-sharing software program, downloaded still images of child pornography from Gilbert's computer IP address in Fort Worth, according to a federal criminal complaint.

Federal agents searched Gilbert's home and seized his computer.

While agents were at the home, Gilbert admitted using file-sharing software and said he had been downloading and trading child porn for about 10 years, according to the criminal complaint.

Federal authorities examined his computer and found images and video files of minors engaging in sexual acts, the criminal complaint stated.

On his Facebook page, Gilbert noted that he taught general, analytical and instrumental chemistry at Texas Wesleyan.

A native of Shelbyville, Ky., Gilbert attended Bellarmine University and the University of Tennessee, according to his Facebook page.

http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/05/23/3981865/ex-texas-wesleyan-professor-pleads.html#storylink=cpy

BillRM
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 07:07 pm
@firefly,
LOL the children reading area/tables chairs are in the center and surrounded by the bookshelves containing the children books at BN.

You can not be looking at the children books without being near and or in the children reading area.

A man therefore talking on a cell phone in that area does not means that you have a likely pedophile to say the least.

But that is just you way of getting out of your position that it is somehow ok to profile all men as likely sexual deviates but not for all other groups such as Muslims as terrorists or blacks as criminals and so on.
firefly
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 07:29 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:

But that is just you way of getting out of your position that it is somehow ok to profile all men as likely sexual deviates but not for all other groups such as Muslims as terrorists or blacks as criminals and so on.

Laughing Laughing Laughing

You are a complete idiot.

You're the one who was profiled as being a pedophile for luring children with kittens in the park. And they were right to get you away from the children.

If you don't want to be profiled as a possible pedophile or child abductor, don't act like one.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 07:30 pm
@firefly,
What a waste of human life and lost to the society of a large amount of human potential.

Too bad he was not living in a saner society such as any of the EU countries where the punishment would more likely match the crime far better and there likely would be treatment involved also.

All those years and all those hundreds of thousands of dollars of training in his profession thrown away in order to make the Fireflies of the world happier.

Kind of remind me of taking one of the world foremost computer experts and a super genie beside and driving Turing to suicide due to his homosexuality that at the time was consider every bit as bad as being a pedophile.

It would be nice in any case if we would first try treatment first before throwing first class minds away even if the Fireflies would be unhappy if we did so.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 07:36 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
You are a complete idiot.


Poor baby it your position that most pedophiles are male so it ok to profile all males as possible pedophiles and the same logic would be that most terrorists are Muslims so it would be ok to profile all Muslims as possible Terrorists.

Same sick logic and it the sick logic you are trying to sell.
firefly
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 07:43 pm
Those who collect and share child pornography are participating in the sexual exploitation and abuse of children. Their actions are criminal.
Quote:
Lockport Man Sentenced for Receipt of Child Pornography
Published on: 2012-06-05

BUFFALO—United States Attorney William J Hochul, Jr announced today that Harold N Hasse, 56, of Lockport, New York, who was convicted of receipt of child pornography, was sentenced to seven years in prison and 10 years’ supervised release by Chief United States District Judge William M Skretny.

Assistant United States Attorney Edward H White, who handled the case, stated that in June 2009, the Niagara County Sheriff’s Department executed a search warrant at the defendant’s Dysinger Road apartment and seized Hasse’s computer. A forensic examination revealed that the computer contained 266 videos and 118 images of child pornography.

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.

The sentencing is the culmination of an investigation on the part of special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Christopher M Piehota; the New York State Police, under the direction of Major Christopher Cummings; and the Niagara County Sheriff’s Department, under the direction of Sheriff James Votour.

Additional assistance was provided by the Western New York Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory, which conducted the forensic analysis of the defendant’s computer.
http://7thspace.com/headlines/414019/lockport_man_sentenced_for_receipt_of_child_pornography.html
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 07:49 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
You're the one who was profiled as being a pedophile for luring children with kittens in the park. And they were right to get you away from the children.

If you don't want to be profiled as a possible pedophile or child abductor, don't act like one.


Footnote I did a long and detail google search looking for one news story of a pedophile using kittens in a park since 1980 to lure children and could not come up with one case of it happening in real life.

Somehow that is not surprising as it is not logical for anyone to draw that amount of attention to himself if he was up to evil of any kind.

Right now I happen to have two kittens and their mother that I will need to find homes for after they are weaned but as I laughing told my wife that if we end up in a park she can either go with me or by herself.

As you had pointed out women are not profile as pedophiles at the moment at least.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 07:51 pm
@BillRM,
You're the only one in this thread who has admitted he was profiled as a possible pedophile for using kittens to lure children in a park.

That was you--not all men--because of the way you were behaving. Cut the crap. If you don't like being profiled as a possible pedophile, don't act like one. You were in a park, with strange children, using the kind of lure commonly used by pedophiles and child abductors, and the other people in the park were right to question your behavior.

Get over it, BillRM.



BillRM
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 08:52 pm
@firefly,
LOL first I was not a bit interested in luring children I was interested in finding homes for some very nice and loving kittens.

It damn annoying to have to go through life thinking how is this action going to look to someone else and as a white middle class person I am not use to thinking in that kind of manner.

Poor black co-workers of mine used to tell me stories of how they are constantly being profile as possible evil doers and they have to be aware at all times how their actions might look to others.

Like the good doctor going into the child section to make a phone call it never enter my mind that trying to find homes for kittens would be view as anything else and what to me is even more amazing/amusing is that my wife who hold a Phd in a field related to child welfare and was a state deputy director for child welfare for an area covering a large northern city, did not think of it either at the time.

Innocent people are not use to thinking in such a manner and it is damn annoying that bigots like you Firefly had manage to demonify males to the point a doctor in BN or poor little old me living with a park near by need to have such silly and time wasting concerns as we go about our lawful lives.
firefly
 
  4  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 09:20 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Poor black co-workers of mine used to tell me stories of how they are constantly being profile as possible evil doers

You mean the way George Zimmerman profiled Trayvon Martin? And suspected him of being a criminal because he was a young black male?

Funny, in your gung-ho support of Zimmerman, in another thread, you've denied the issue of racial profiling, and denied that it played any part in why Zimmerman noticed, pursued, and confronted Martin. That you are now trying to play the race card proves what a phony hypocrite you are.

This thread is not about you or your personal problems being profiled as a pedophile because of your behavior with children in a park. If you have problems dealing with that, go see a good shrink.

And, go get your cats spayed and neutered so you won't find yourself constantly trying to get rid of unwanted kittens.

This thread is about child pornography--but you seem too senile to be able to remember that.






firefly
 
  3  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 09:42 pm
Quote:
Child porn victim seeks restitution after years of exploitation, shame
May 27, 2010
CLAIR JOHNSON Of The Gazette Staff

Vicky was 10 years old when her father began raping and sodomizing her. He sexually abused his daughter for two years, and he videotaped the abuse and distributed the images on the Internet.

The movies and photographs of Vicky (a pseudonym) are considered to be among the most widely circulated images of child pornography, said Carol Hepburn, a Seattle attorney representing Vicky in numerous child pornography cases across the country.

Images of Vicky have been identified by the National Center For Missing and Exploited Children in about 8,000 cases, she said.

“Some of these images were ones that he specifically made in order to share with other online pedophiles,” Hepburn said of Vicky’s father, who divorced Vicky’s mother when Vicky was a toddler. Some images were the result of people “placing orders, if you will,” she said. “He scripted what he was doing to her. It’s horrendous.”

Now a woman in her early 20s, Vicky is fighting back. In more than 80 federal court cases, including six in Montana, she is seeking restitution from those convicted of receiving or possessing images of her. Three of the Montana cases are in the Billings district.

Restitution is an emerging issue in federal child porn cases as victims are identified and are starting to submit claims. Judges across the country are grappling with how much restitution, if any, to order from those convicted of possessing or receiving the material but not creating it.

The first federal law addressing child pornography was passed in 1978 and prohibited the making and commercial distribution of obscene material involving children under age 16. In 1988, it became illegal to use a computer to depict or advertise child porn.

Over the years, a series of statutes and court rulings have refined and tightened child porn laws, making it a crime to knowingly possess, manufacture, distribute or receive the material. The penalties for conviction can be stiff. Receiving child porn carries a minimum mandatory five years to 20 years in prison and a maximum $250,000 fine.

Restitution in sexual exploitation cases has its roots in two 1994 laws addressing violent crime and violence against women. Those laws were the first to make restitution mandatory in sexual exploitation cases and certain other crimes.

Historically, courts ordered restitution for those convicted of sexually abusing a victim or producing child porn. But the mandatory restitution law applies to all crimes involving the sexual exploitation of children, including distributing, receiving or possessing child porn.

In February 2009, a federal judge in Connecticut said he would order $200,000 restitution from a man convicted of possessing and distributing the material. The case was settled for $130,000. Since then, numerous claims for restitution have been filed by victims in child porn cases. Restitution has ranged as high as $3.2 million, which was ordered in a Florida case under appeal.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Marcia Hurd said in court records that Vicky is among the first to make such restitution claims.

“Vicky and other child victims like her continue to suffer separate and distinct injuries from the consumers of child pornography who acquire her images,’’ Hurd said. While production may be immediately harmful to the child involved, the distribution of images exacerbates the harm by being an invasion of privacy and by providing the market that led to the creation of the images in the first place, she said.

The question is how to quantify the harm caused to Vicky in a restitution order, Hurd said.

Defense attorneys say the restitution law is being misapplied.

Assistant federal defender Mark Werner of Billings said the restitution issue needs to be settled. So far, no circuit court has ruled on the matter.

The mandatory-restitution law says that the defendant shall pay restitution for any offense to the victim. It defines “victim’’ as“the individual harmed as the result of a commission of a crime.”

The law further says restitution includes costs incurred by the victim for medical services, including physical or psychological care; physical or occupational therapy; transportation; lost income; attorney fees; and “any other losses suffered by the victim as a proximate result of the offense.”

Werner is appealing to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals the sentence and restitution recently ordered for Billings resident Keith Edward Baroun, 35, who admitted receiving child porn on his computer.

Chief U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull sentenced Baroun to 13 years and nine months in prison and ordered $3,000 restitution to Vicky. Cebull held Baroun responsible for 2,700 images, including 36 videos. Three of the videos were of Vicky.

Hepburn filed a restitution claim seeking $231,891 for Vicky, mostly for counseling.

Werner argued against restitution in a sentencing memo, saying that the “proximate cause” language requires a victim’s losses be tied to a defendant’s specific conduct. Vicky’s attorney, he said, is “making the same restitution claim in cases across the country, without regard to the actual culpability of the individual defendant involved. This is unfair and attempts to distort the restitution process.”

Cebull rejected Werner’s argument and ordered $3,000 restitution in his first ruling on the issue.

“It is certainly difficult, if not impossible, to determine the exact degree of victimization. However, this defendant and every person who possesses these images causes a real and cognizable harm to the victims,” Cebull said.

Cebull, following what some other judges have done, derived the $3,000 figure as 2 percent of a $150,000 maximum civil remedy for personal injuries in child sexual exploitation cases. Cebull said he was confident the amount was less than the actual harm Baroun caused Vicky and therefore resolved any “due-process concerns.”

Montana’s federal judges are split on the issue. Senior U.S. District Judge Jack Shanstrom in Billings has ordered $3,000 restitution in two cases, with one of the cases under appeal by the defense and restitution having been paid in the other case. U.S. District Judge Sam Haddon in Great Falls also ordered $3,000 restitution in one case in which both parties agreed to the amount.

U.S. District Judge Don Molloy in Missoula has denied restitution in two cases, with the prosecution appealing in one of the cases.

In denying restitution in the case under appeal, Molloy ruled that the government had not met its burden to prove that the defendant, Robert James Lawton, caused Vicky’s losses. “While‘Vicky’ has undoubtedly suffered great harm because of the abuse she suffered and the availability of these images on the Internet, there is not sufficient evidence to show that her losses were proximately caused by Lawton’s conduct,’’ he said.

Neither Vicky, nor any other victim, appeared at sentencing, Molloy said. And the government did not provide any evidence, other than documents already submitted by Vicky’s lawyer, to demonstrate that Lawton was responsible for losses sustained by Vicky, he said.

Werner said he doesn’t think defense attorneys are disputing that possession contributes to child porn trafficking. But that doesn’t answer the question of what specific damage the possession caused the victim, Werner said. The victim may have “a general anxiety” knowing images are out there, but that is “a long way’’from addressing restitution requirements, he said.

Billings defense attorney Sandy Selvey has raised similar arguments in appealing a sentence and restitution order imposed on his client, Richard John Baxter. Shanstrom sentenced Baxter, 41, of Billings, in September to more than 17 years in prison and ordered $3,000 restitution for receipt of child porn, including images of Vicky.

Hepburn requested $150,247 restitution for Vicky.

Selvey argued that the government had to prove the amount of Vicky’s losses that are a “direct result’’ of Baxter possessing her images. “The losses described in Vicky’s victim impact statement and as alleged by the government are generalized and caused by her initial abuse as well as the general existence and dissemination of her pornographic images,’’ Selvey said in his appeal. “No effort has been made to show the portion of these losses specifically caused by Richard Baxter’s possession of images of Vicky. Mr. Baxter simply is not responsible for any loss to Vicky.’’

Vicky is seeking restitution because she needs a lot of therapy, Hepburn said.

Vicky’s father was eventually tracked down overseas where he had fled, was prosecuted and is now serving a 50-year federal sentence, but the images are still out there, Hepburn said.

“It really is almost viral the way they can spread,’ she said.

Vicky has no control over who sees the intimate, humiliating and embarrassing images, Hepburn said. “The anonymity of the crime is part of the damage for her,’ she said.

Vicky worked in a retail job but found she was having anxiety attacks when waiting on male customers. Vicky would wonder if the customer was looking at her longer than normal and wondered if he had seen the pictures, Hepburn said.

“It’s helpful for her to have this acknowledged that this has done her harm,” Hepburn said. “She’s really focused on trying to be normal. She is really about encouraging other victims, survivors to come forward.”

Restitution requests are new, Hepburn acknowledged.

“You have to remember, there are very few of these victims who have the strength to even come forward and even say, ‘I’m out here. This happened to me,’ ” she said.

People who download child porn are responsible for harming victims because without the demand, the material would not be produced or spread over the Internet, Hepburn said. Congress, court rulings and the Supreme Court have said these children are victims and possessing child porn images harms them, she said. “They can’t point the finger and say not me,’’ she said. “People still think of this as a victimless crime, which it is not.’’

Distribution of child porn is a “horrendous violation of privacy,’’ Hepburn said. “It’s just like looking in the window when the abuse was happening.’’

Hepburn and Werner both recognize there are a variety of views on the issue.

“I think there are some very thoughtful opinions out there that do award restitution,” Hepburn said. Some judges, she said, have“very honest differences of opinion.’’

“This is a really difficult issue. Both sides can make reasonable arguments,” Werner said. “It may even go to the Supreme Court.”
.
http://billingsgazette.com/news/article_48495bee-694d-11df-b680-001cc4c03286.html#ixzz1wyj0ntUK
BillRM
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 09:45 pm
@firefly,
Poor Trayvon that innocent kid that try to pound Zimmerman brains out is that the Trayvon you are talking about Firefly?

Now if the good doctor have try to killed the BN employee that kicked him out of the store or if I had done likewise to the park employee then you could compare the three matters.

Zimmerman was proven right in his opinion of Trayvon by the actions of Trayvon that night.

Oh none of my black coworkers had try to kill anyone who had annoy them as far as I know at least nor is there any indication that Zimmerman care about Trayvon skin color instead of his behaviors that night.

Good try however....................

0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Tue 5 Jun, 2012 10:06 pm
@firefly,
Well child porn in my opinion should be again the law my only problem is the insane degree of punishment under US Federal law and as far as making the victims rich by transferring funds from those who have those computer files, sometimes decades after the event, to them the higher courts had been having a problem with awards/damage amounts pull out of thin air.



0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 11 Jun, 2012 06:36 am
Yes we US are insane over this subject and the message seems to be that raping a child is less serious then having computer files of others harming children or doing most murders for that matter.


http://www.paysonroundup.com/news/2012/jun/05/governor-denies-flibottes-appeal/


.Archive for Tuesday, June 5, 2012 Archive for Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Governor denies Flibotte’s appeal
Realtor’s 90-year sentence stands despite plea by Clemency Board
By Alexis Bechman

June 5, 2012

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has rejected a former local real-estate agent’s request for a reduction in his 90-year sentence for possession of child pornography.

The Arizona Board of Executive Clemency in February recommended the governor commute Robert Thomas Flibotte’s sentence to five years in jail with lifetime probation, but the governor nonetheless denied the appeal, according to Jesse Hernandez, chair of the clemency board.

The governor’s office offered no comment.

Flibotte’s attorney Edward Novak did not return a call seeking comment as of press time.

On July 28, a jury convicted Flibotte, 74, on 10 counts of dangerous acts against children after prosecutors presented images and videos of children engaged in sexual acts to the jury.

Prosecutors said Flibotte collected child pornography, as evidenced by the 26,000 images and 500 videos detectives found on 30 media storage devices in Flibotte’s home and work. Some depicted girls between the ages of eight and 12 engaged in various sexual acts.

The prosecution also pointed out that Flibotte had literature detailing how to hide porn on a computer and unlock encrypted files.

Prosecutors originally charged Flibotte with 15 counts of child porn, but only ended up going to trial on 10 counts.


At sentencing, Gila County Superior Court Judge Peter Cahill ordered Flibotte to serve nine, 10-year sentences. By state law, each sentence must be served consecutively; therefore, Flibotte faces 90 years in jail as well as lifetime probation.

Throughout the trial, Flibotte maintained his innocence and said the pornographic images came from a computer virus.

Five months after the sentencing, the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency met to discuss Flibotte’s appeal.

The clemency board unanimously agreed the 90-year sentence was excessive based on Flibotte’s clean criminal record and reputation in the community.

Flibotte, a 33-year resident of Payson and Air Force Reserve veteran, received an outpouring of support from the community.

Nearly 100 letters presented to Cahill before sentencing asked the court to consider probation.

Flibotte cultivated many strong relationships in the area as a community leader and volunteer.

Flibotte co-founded Payson Coldwell Banker Realty, served 16 years on Payson’s Planning and Zoning Commission and was a member of Rotary.

Cahill allowed Flibotte to seek a sentence commutation.

“If I were to think of the murderers I’ve sentenced to mere decades, 22 years, and compare it to the sentence I’ve just imposed for 90 years, it’s clearly excessive,” Cahill said at sentencing.

After a psychological and psychosexual evaluation, Dr. Richard Lanyon said he did not believe Flibotte would re-offend especially with counseling.

“Given Mr. Flibotte’s long-term monogamous relationship and the fact that he has reportedly never engaged in deviant sexual activity (with) actual children, despite many opportunities to do so, I believe it is unnecessary for him to register as a sex offender,” Lanyon said in a report.

At a clemency hearing, the board questioned Flibotte on his responsibility for his actions. Flibotte reportedly acknowledged his behavior and “the horrors of child pornography” and that it is “not a harmless, victimless crime.”

The clemency board said despite the seriousness of Flibotte’s crime, a five-year jail sentence and lifetime probation is “adequate to serve justice and protection for the community.”

Brewer has since replaced three of the five board members that made this recommendation.

According to an article by The Arizona Republic, “a person familiar with the board said that the governor was upset about the board’s unanimous Jan. 26 decision to recommend a reduction to five years in prison and lifetime supervision for Robert Flibotte, 74, a Payson real estate agent sentenced to 90 years for possession of child
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Mon 11 Jun, 2012 06:48 am

Ransomware Scam Accuses People of Viewing Child Porn, Tells Them to Pay Up

The Internet Crime Complaint Center is warning people about a new Citadel malware platform used to deliver ransomware, named Reveton.
By Christina DesMarais | PC World | 03 June 12

Online scammers' latest ploy is a scheme that lures Internet users to install ransomware on their computers, which then makes them think they violated federal law by viewing child porn and must pay a fine.

IC3 says victims are lured to a drive-by download website that installs the ransomware on their computers. Shortly thereafter, the computer seizes up and a warning is displayed that declares the user's IP address was identified by the Justice Department's Computer Crime & Intellectual Property Section as having visited sites offering child porn and other illegal content.

"To unlock their computer the user is instructed to pay a $100 fine to the U.S. Department of Justice, using prepaid money card services. The geographic location of the user's IP address determines what payment services are offered. In addition to the ransomware, the Citadel malware continues to operate on the compromised computer and can be used to commit online banking and credit card fraud," IC3 says in its warning.

Reveton is a variant of the nasty Trojan known as Citadel malware that is based on Zeus, one of the oldest and most used online banking trojans. The Citadel crimeware toolkit is now open sourced and is evolving and spreading rapidly, resulting in insidious new versions such as Reveton.

Bottom line: Be careful online. Don't click on links in emails or on websites that are unfamiliar to you or from people or sources you don't know.



Read more: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/security/3361722/ransomware-scam-accuses-people-of-viewing-child-porn-tells-them-pay-up/#xdm_e=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcadvisor.co.uk&xdm_c=default8537&xdm_p=1&#ixzz1xULAGLNd
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Mon 11 Jun, 2012 08:23 am
INSANITY..............


Rep. Lamborn panel blocks bath photo over child-porn concerns
Posted: 06/06/2012 01:00:00 AM MDT
June 6, 2012 4:54 PM GMTUpdated: 06/06/2012 10:54:40 AM MDTBy Allison Sherry
The Denver Postdenverpost.com

An award-winning coal-mining activist was questioned for 45 minutes by police on suspicion of child pornography after U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn's energy and mineral resources subcommittee decided a photo she submitted of a child in foul bathwater was inappropriate.

Maria Gunnoe of West Virginia had been invited by Lamborn — a Colorado Springs Republican and the subcommittee's chairman — to testify at his hearing Friday on the Spruce Coal Mine in her state. It was the fourth time Gunnoe had been in front of the committee and the second time she had been there at the behest of Lamborn.

Gunnoe, a grandmother, said that when she has spoken to the committee previously, she never felt as if members

"I was drawn to the photo because I think it really captured what happened here," Gunnoe said from her home Tuesday.

Lamborn — who leads the energy and mineral resources subcommittee under the House Committee on Natural Resources — said he heard about the photo before the hearing and decided to pull it from the planned presentation without looking at it. As chairman of the subcommittee, he is in charge of the hearing, the witnesses and the staff.

"I accept the judgment of professional staff," Lamborn said Tuesday. "If it's inappropriate, I don't think I should be viewing it. The fewer people who viewed it, the better."

Lamborn on Tuesday said he still hadn't seen the photo and didn't intend to.

As committee rules dictate, Gunnoe e-mailed the photo to the GOP committee staffers about 8 a.m., two hours before the hearing started. When she arrived on Capitol Hill, she was told by the same staffers that the photo was inappropriate and she could not display it during her testimony.

"I asked them why, and they just kept saying it was inappropriate. There were no more answers than that," Gunnoe said. "I just let it go because the hearing was about to start."

The photo by award-winning photographer Katie Falkenberg was part of a photo essay about the effects of mountaintop removal coal mining. It is taken from above a 5-year-old in West Virginia bathing in murky orange water. The child's face is not identifiable, and Falkenberg says the parents were in the room when the photo was taken and granted permission for the photo to be used at the hearing.

Gunnoe went on to testify about the perils of mountaintop removal mining in her state, particularly the Spruce Coal Mine, which Republicans say the Obama administration is holding up.

After the hearing, a U.S. Capitol Police officer asked Gunnoe to step into a side room alone to answer questions. For 45 minutes, he asked Gunnoe who she was, where she was from, where the photos came from, what she did for a living. Gunnoe said it was a "reasonable line of questioning since his job is to investigate these claims."

Lamborn's office said he did not recommend police be called and said it was a "senior committee staff decision." He said he may draft a policy in the future where he is notified if police are called on a witness.

"I've never been through this before," he said.

Lamborn is seeking a fourth term and is in a tight primary race against El Paso County businessman Robert Blaha to keep his seat. Since 2007, Lamborn has earned a name for himself as a social conservative who ardently protects defense spending and advocates on social issues.

Last year, he got in trouble by comparing President Barack Obama to a "tar baby" on a radio show. He later apologized for the remark.

Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., chairman of the Natural Resources Committee, told Politico on Tuesday night that he stands by Lamborn's decision not to display the photo in the hearing. He did not say who called police on Gunnoe.

Spencer Pederson, a Republican spokesman for the committee, said in a statement: "The photograph was inappropriate for a congressional hearing. ... We respect the professional judgment of the Capitol Police to determine how to handle such a matter, which is why it was referred to them."

Joan Mulhern, an attorney and legislative council for Earthjustice, was with Gunnoe on Friday and called the entire saga "despicable."

"I thought they just didn't want her to show the picture because they were in denial about water pollution," Mulhern said. "But by taking it this far, it is intimidating to a witness. ... I've never seen anything like it."

Gunnoe has won several awards for speaking out on behalf of impoverished communities in the heart of southern Appalachia just 5 miles as the crow flies from where the Hatfields (of the Hatfields and McCoys) lived, she said.

"I am a mother and a grandmother first," she said, noting she has a 21-year-old son who is a coal miner, an 18-year-old daughter, a grandson and is about to adopt her 8-year-old nephew because his mother was killed in a car accident. "He (Lamborn) should have seen the photo and he wouldn't have made this decision."

Eben Burnham-Snyder, a Democratic spokesman for the Natural Resources Committee, said Gunnoe "had a picture that every parent in America has taken."

"Thankfully, most parents in our country don't have to worry about bathing their kids in polluted water," Burnham-Snyder said.

Gunnoe said she has not heard from Capitol Police since Friday. A spokeswoman told The Denver Post that they "conducted a preliminary investigation. No criminal activity was discovered."

Allison Sherry: 202-662-8907, [email protected] or twitter.com/allisonsherry

Copyright 2012 The Denver Post. All rights reserved.
Follow Allison Sherry on Twitter.



Read more: Rep. Lamborn panel blocks bath photo over child-porn concerns - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/politics/ci_20791925/rep-lamborn-panel-blocks-bath-photo-over-child#ixzz1xUiRcVXQ
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Mon 11 Jun, 2012 09:35 am
Quote:
Child Porn Bust: 18 Children Saved, 190 Predators Arrested, Feds Say
The Huffington Post
By Simon McCormack
06/08/2012

A joint effort by two federal agencies netted a massive number of alleged child predators.

A reported 190 sexual predators were captured and 18 children were saved in the month-long operation, according to a Homeland Security news release sent to The Huffington Post.

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents worked together on the operation, which was aimed at finding individuals who possessed, received, transported, distributed, advertised or produced images or videos of child pornography, the release said.

Most of the May arrests were made in America, but there were also suspects apprehended in Spain, the Philippines, Argentina and the United Kingdom, the release said.

Those arrested included 54-year-old Thomas Wright, who is accused of making and possessing child pornography. Wright allegedly convinced a minor to "participate with him in illegal sexual conduct" while Wright photographed the encounters. He also allegedly secretly filmed the minor during other sexual acts.

Cedric Conner, 35, was arrested for allegedly assaulting a 7-year-old child he babysat.

"Let this operation be a warning to anyone who would think they can use the Internet to exploit children," ICE Director John Morton said in the release. "We are out there looking for you, we will find you, and you will be prosecuted."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/08/child-porn-bust-children-saved-predators-arrested_n_1581748.html

People, including you, BillRM, should heed that warning if they don't want to be arrested and prosecuted.

Quote:
Matthew Allen with Homeland Security's local office says the operation targeted those exploiting children.

"Either physically exploiting them or victimizing them and exploiting them by trading child pornography which I think as we all know once it's introduced on the internet, it takes on a life of its own, and that victimization, exploitation goes on virtually forever," says Allen.
http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/story/18742393/3-child-porn-peddlers-from-phoenix-arrested-in-nationwide-operation
firefly
 
  1  
Mon 11 Jun, 2012 09:49 am
It is unusual for a woman to be arrested for possession of child pornography, but it does occur.
Quote:
"I’ve seen cases of women collecting or trading child porn, but not very often and not somebody in that socio-economic strata," said Nancy Hagan, the longtime executive director of the Alliance for Children, a Fort Worth child advocacy center.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/54269992-68/child-perdue-pornography-woman.html.csp


This woman has just been charged.
Quote:
Monday, June 11, 2012
Socialite Charged With Child Pornography
By DAVID LEE

DALLAS (CN) - Federal prosecutors accuse Dallas-area socialite Erika Susan Perdue of amassing a child pornography collection so large she could not keep track of its contents.
Perdue, 41, of University Park, was indicted on two counts of transporting and shipping child pornography, one count of receipt of child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography.
Federal agents raided her mansion in April after an FBI agent downloaded files from her computer over a peer-to-peer file sharing program in January.
Using the handle Classybitch, Perdue shared 287 files, most of which depicted child pornography, according to an affidavit by FBI Special Agent Deborah Michaels.
Several of the images and videos allegedly depict girls engaging in sex with adults.
When questioned, Perdue admitted that she had possessed and shared the child pornography since 1999, according to the affidavit.
"She confided that because she has collected so much child pornography, that she could not remember if she had transported the specific images and videos to law enforcement on those dates," Agent Michaels said in the affidavit. "She also confessed that she used file-sharing child pornography everyday, including the day prior."
Perdue admitted she traded in child pornography while her husband, a Dallas attorney, was away at work and said she was aware that others were downloading files that she shared, according to court documents.
Her husband is not named in the complaint, nor is he accused of any involvement.

The pornography is explicit and vile, according to the indictment.

For instance, File Name "! 2yo + mom+dadf..-4.wmv" contains the Description: "A video file depicting a female placing her tongue on the genitals of a minor nude female child. Also depicted is a male penetrating the genitals of the same minor female child," according to the indictment. Perdue is accused of transmitting this video to another software user outside of Texas.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/11/47314.htm

0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Mon 11 Jun, 2012 09:59 am
More on that child pornography ring the Feds just busted up...
Quote:
Feds break international child porn operation

By CHARLES WILSON, Associated Press – 3 days ago

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Investigators have busted a child pornography ring spread across the U.S. and Europe that produced and distributed sexually explicit images of babies and toddlers online, federal prosecutors in Indianapolis said Thursday.

Seven American men have been convicted and sentenced on various charges in the case, including three who were sentenced in federal court in Indianapolis on Wednesday, the U.S. attorney's office said. Two more who pleaded guilty are awaiting sentencing.

"This operation uncovered a dangerous and depraved group of criminals who were devoted to trading sexually explicit images of children under the age of five," Assistant U.S. Attorney General Larry Breuer said in a statement.

More than 20 suspects have been captured in nine states, and authorities are investigating yet more elsewhere in the U.S., as well as Sweden, Serbia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Josh Minkler said at an Indianapolis news conference that more than two dozen children in Indiana and elsewhere were abused in the production of the pornography.

"Children who far too often weren't old enough to comprehend the crimes committed against them," Minkler said. "Children who were raped in this state and were too young to ask for help."

Some of the suspects had legal custody of their victims, and those children have been removed, prosecutors said.

The "most prolific producer of child pornography" in the group was 26-year-old David Bostic, Assistant U.S. Attorney Brant Cook said.

Bostic persuaded parents to allow him to babysit and, thus entrusted, abused the children without their knowledge, Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve DeBrota said.

He was arrested in November 2010 after federal, state and local investigators raided his home in Bloomington, Ind., uncovering hundreds of pictures and videos on his computer of children engaged in sexual acts, including four girls aged from 2 months to 3 years and one 4-year-old boy who had been entrusted to his care.

He was convicted on 65 counts and sentenced to 315 years in prison.

Bostic's arrest heralded the launch of Operation Bulldog; further investigation of his computer led investigators to others in the group.

DeBrota said the members met though a website and traded videos and still images by email.

"When they found a like-minded individual with this particular attraction that was very powerful and helped them rationalize what they were doing — in their world — was OK," DeBrota said. "That ability to find a like-minded individual online that you couldn't find in the real world is a severe danger that comes with the Internet."

DeBrota told reporters that one suspect had an ultrasound image of an unborn baby whom the prosecutor characterized as a potential future victim. He declined to provide more details, citing the ongoing investigation.

"We have examples of offenders who were planning on having children for the purpose of having a class of victims," DeBrota said.

Shawn Kuykendall, 32, of Summerville, S.C., was sentenced Wednesday to 25 years, while 23-year-old Javahn Algere, of New Orleans, got 12 years and 21-year-old Richard Szulborski, of East Texas, Pa., was sentenced to a 15-year term.

Sentenced earlier were Bostic; Danny L. Druck, 58, of Louisville, Ky., eight years; Chris Reid, 37, of Saginaw, Mich., 35 years; Todd King, 41, of Crestline, Calif., eight years.

Nicholas King, 28, of Bellingham, Wash., and 22-year-old Jeremy Labrec, of Lubbock, Texas, have pleaded guilty and await sentencing, prosecutors said.

"Child pornography rings pose a threat to children around the world and we will continue to aggressively investigate and prosecute those who participate in such groups," Breuer said.

Operation Bulldog was a result of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide Department of Justice initiative to combat online child sexual exploitation and abuse.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h2GdShcjP4wvdM5rP2Lmyv3swe6A?docId=e461f7ba3abb4e2daec55593dfc0be2f
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 11 Jun, 2012 11:12 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Those arrested included 54-year-old Thomas Wright, who is accused of making and possessing child pornography. Wright allegedly convinced a minor to "participate with him in illegal sexual conduct" while Wright photographed the encounters. He also allegedly secretly filmed the minor during other sexual actsCedric Conner, 35, was arrested for allegedly assaulting a 7-year-old child he babysat. .




Well Firefly you do know or I guess you know that the crime of having CP and molesting children directly in order to produce CP or for any other reason is not one and the same thing.

The two crimes should not have the same ranges of punishments but as of now it would seems the crime of having such materials can yield a greater level of punishment then the rape of children.

That is insane under any rational moral code I ever hear of even those you are willing to defend it.

Beside throwing in the insanity of charging young people for sharing sexual picture of themselves with their sexual partners as CP or having materials showing a 17 years olds willing taking part in producing porn as the same under our current laws as materials showing the rape of infants.

Severe punishment can be have for those who should have that level of punishment without the need to throw out all commonsense in so must as other countries are doing so.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/21/2024 at 07:48:52