@firefly,
David wrote:Is it your general sense of the situation
that Mr. Aron saw it that way ?
firefly wrote:I don't really know how Aron saw the situation--or even why he took the boy and kept him in his attic apartment.
I meant your sense of the situation
from the evidence that has been made public.
firefly wrote:If we can believe what Aron told the police,
and I'm not sure we can, when he went outside on Tuesday morning,
to go to work, and saw all the fliers about the missing boy, he panicked--so,
Do u think that 's plausible ???
firefly wrote:after he got home from work, he murdered the child.
But, why was he still keeping the child in his apartment Tuesday morning, and why did he go to work and leave the child there?
Even after he saw the fliers, he had the options of just taking the child back to his parents, or simply driving him somewhere
and leaving him on the street.
I believe that he shoud have
done that.
firefly wrote:He chose the option of killing the child and disposing of the dismembered body--apparently in an attempt to protect himself,
at the expense of the child's life.
That appears to be the case, and that is what the admitted murderer says.
I can 't think of a reason to disbelieve him. Can u ???
firefly wrote:Whatever psychiatric and intellectual problems this man may have,
that may have affected his judgment regarding options, he was able
to formulate a pre-meditated plan of action that he knew would result
in the death of the child, and he was able to carry out his plan and
dispose of the body--and he knew what he was doing was wrong
(he acknowledged that to the police).
Yes.
firefly wrote:Blaming the senseless brutal murder of an innocent child on the fact that the police and volunteers were combing the neighborhood
looking for the child, and posting fliers everywhere, and that apparently "panicked" Aron, really makes little sense.
Well, he says that is the reason that he committed the murder.
Can u think of a reason that he has to lie about this fact???
If the Court believes him, will that
HELP him in some way????
Will that earn him a softer sentence??
I don't see that it will.
This is the same as Ted Kennedy's situation in his silently checking
into that hotel and concealing the fact of Mary Jo 's being in his car,
while she was suffocating in her air pocket, as he discussed his situation
on the fone with his attorneys and with his political advisors.
He called for help on the following day, after allowing time
for his body to metabolize any alcohol in his blood.
firefly wrote:He is responsible for what he did--regardless of why he did it.
Does anyone deny that?
I don 't see much chance for his insanity defense.
firefly wrote:I don't know that in the future, when a child is missing, that fliers should not be posted,
or that people shouldn't be out searching, just because of this case.
I dunno. I don't.
What if the same thing happens again?
I don't have a better idea. I have no suggestions,
except my permanent suggestion that every person
who might become a victim in the future shoud arm himself defensively.
That is what I did, when I was his age. I think
that is the best we can do.
David