@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:dave,
you are advocating arming (heavily, I might add) all traveling 8 year olds?
Really...?
I am very, very pleased -- thrilled-- by the fact
that I don't have any kids. If I
DID, then I 'd be confronted
with a decision about his personal defenses.
That is a very
INDIVIDUAL decision,
very personal as to the kid himself, the nature of his mind.
This is
NOT the first time that something like this has happened.
I woud not put a loaded revolver into the hands of a chimpanzee
and there are humen for whose minds I have little more respect,
but I will
NOT attaint the minds of America 's children thusly,
en masse,
as
U wish to do.
You are hitting them below the belt; naked prejudice.
There survives a letter from Thomas Jefferson
to his 12 year old nephew, wherein he counsels
the boy to take his gun with him when he goes out for a walk.
When I was 8, and on many occasions since then,
I have been in the presence of armed children
(mostly at gunnery ranges). Thay were calm; not stupid.
I never saw anything objectionable happen,
tho I must admit that accidents can and do happen
under any circumstance.
Children shoud be trained in the public schools
in the competent & accurate use of defensive firearms,
the same as thay are taught to swim.
MY position is simply that there is
NO age limit
in the 2nd Amendment;
every citizen has an
EQUAL right
to defend his life from the predatory violence of man or beast.
Whoever
DENIES that,
takes the position that a juvenile victim of violence
must, by law, offer himself up for the slaughter of
any predator of superior force, because of the victim's age;
i.e., that is saying that the death penalty shoud apply
to being young (in the
discretion of a violent predator).
I woud
restore the
status quo ante before gun control.
The right to bear arms, defensively,
has been put beyond the reach of government by the Founders of this Republic.
David