15
   

8-year-old Leiby Kletzky murder

 
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 02:27 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I find myself strangely unconcerned by this butcher's happiness
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 02:33 am
@roger,
roger wrote:
I find myself strangely unconcerned by this butcher's happiness
Many folks feel vindictive; I do.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 06:59 am
@Miller,
Miller wrote:

Arella Mae wrote:

Leopold was also responsible for introducing education into the prisons (can't remember exactly how). I saw a documentary on it the other day. I had no idea he had done that or that he had gotten out of jail. Shows how depraved mankind can be.................only evil thinks of doing what they did.


Leopold was also married, while in jail ( as far as I can recall ).


Oh? I didn't know that. I will never understand the fascination some have with marrying inmates.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:51 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:

We 'll never know, but he alleges that the posters and the great search
paniced him.

But, had he returned the child unharmed, and unmolested, and explained that he was trying to help a lost boy, he would have been considered a hero--he could even have claimed a substantial reward.
Quote:
He admits the murder, but denies any kidnapping
and he alleges that he was a good host, up to, but not including, the murder.

We don't know why he took the child back to his attic apartment instead of immediately returning him to his parents. We don't know what he said to the boy to induce him to trust him and get into a car with him. What did he intend to do with the child?

They don't know exactly when the child was killed, or when he was tied up. The murderer alleges he tied the child up just before smothering him, but that mught not be true--the body did have ligature marks--the boy might have been tied up and held captive for some time before he was killed.

This child was from a very religious Orthodox Hassidic family with an insular lifestyle. They had no TV in their home. The parents may still not be fully aware of the grim details of their son's murder as the community has tried to shield them from those facts.
Quote:
The New York Times
July 14, 2011
A World Sheltered From TV, if Not Violence
By JIM DWYER

Down the block from the home of Levi Aron, the hardware-store clerk accused this week of slaughtering a child in Brooklyn, a neighbor, Miriam Levy, spoke about peculiar qualities that she had discovered only after Mr. Aron’s arrest.

Ms. Levy, 22, had looked at an online profile for him.

“His interests were ‘American Idol,’ Lady Gaga and ‘Glee,’ ” she said.

These may be fixtures of popular culture, but they are exotica in the ultra-Orthodox communities of Borough Park and the neighboring Kensington, where Mr. Aron lived, she explained.

“Most of us, the kids in this neighborhood, we don’t have TVs,” Ms. Levy said. “We wouldn’t know about such things.”

Leiby Kletzky, 8, vanished late Monday afternoon and was lost to his world for more than 30 hours, until police officers found his feet in Mr. Aron’s freezer early Wednesday.

For now, Mr. Aron is the only narrator of those missing hours, and his account must be viewed with great caution. In it, the authorities report, Mr. Aron stated that Leiby was alive until Tuesday night, when Mr. Aron killed him in a panic over the extensive search that the boy’s disappearance had inspired.

In this version of events, Leiby spent Tuesday in Mr. Aron’s house, watching television while Mr. Aron went to work. If the story is true, the boy was indulging a fascination with something that he had almost no experience with. He had crossed a bridge into a world that his community worked mightily to keep away.

On Thursday, four mourners who were leaving the Kletzky house stopped for a moment.

“There’s no TV in there,” said Barry Feldheim, 35. This is a common circumstance in the households of Borough Park, and the reason, he said, is simple: Television distorts reality and is not true to life as it is actually lived in the Hasidic community or elsewhere.

“We don’t want kids to see violence, murders,” Mr. Feldheim said. “Even romance.”

The absence of television is not a religious edict, at least as far as anyone could recall on the street on Thursday. It is a custom, and a protective one, said Rachel Eidlis, a schoolteacher. “It’s not trying to cover up or hide from the world,” Ms. Eidlis said. “When you watch these things on television, you lose sensitivity.”

Her husband, Benjamin Eidlis, said that computers were far more common, as it was all but impossible to survive in the business world without being online. The television, with its one-way stream, could not be seen as essential, and certainly not as desirable, he said.

OF course, it is entirely possible that the account of young Leiby watching television in Mr. Aron’s attic was created as a kind of wishful lie by a man who wanted to endow the boy’s time in his care with some meaning beyond the deranged brutality of its end.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/nyregion/sheltered-hasidic-community-stunned-by-kletzky-killing.html?src=recg&pagewanted=print







0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 12:05 pm

Levi Aron's confession about 'panicking,'
bringing Leiby to wedding so bizarre experts are confused
BY Rich Schapiro
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Confessed child butcher Levi Aron's crime was so barbaric
and his confession so bizarre that it has even left experts baffled.

In the hours after cops found Leiby Kletsky's dismembered body,
Aron told investigators he was only trying to help the lost little boy
find his way home.

He claims he didn't hurt the child for an entire day - until he
panicked when he learned a massive search was underway.

"It's highly illogical and makes no sense," said Lawrence Koblinsky,
a professor of forensic science at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

"If you realize there's a big search out there, okay you might be upset
or frightened because you've got the kid, but you let the kid loose
on the street."

What makes the case especially perplexing, experts say, is that
Aron, 35, does not have a violent criminal history and early
indications are Leiby was not sexually assaulted.

Kobilinsky said he thinks the crime might "boil down to a psychotic episode."

"If the guy is psychotic, that would explain a lot of things,"
Kobilinsky added. "Then, there's no logic to what they do."

Aron's lawyers have already laid groundwork for a possible insanity
defense, telling a Brooklyn judge the suspect "hears voices and has
had hallucinations" but Joseph Pollini, a retired NYPD homicide
detective, believes an insanity claim would not succeed.

"For him to make such statements such as he panicked, that he was
aware they were looking for him, that would take away his ability to
claim insanity," Pollini said.

"For someone to claim insanity, he would have needed not to
know what was going on. He'd [have to] be in a different world."

Pollini said he doubts Aron's claim he brought Leiby to a wedding
Monday night and that he was alive at lunchtime Tuesday.

"It doesn't sound like a plausible scenario," Pollini said, adding that
Aron's "ulterior motive still remains to be seen."

Retired FBI profiler Clint Van Zandta said there are still too many
uncertainties to decide if Aron is a liar or a lunatic.

"Right now, I've got as many questions as I do answers," Van Zandt said.
"Either his story is all a lie, or this is a massive break from reality
that a psychologist is going to have to explain."

0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 12:07 pm

I wish that the victim
had been defensively well armed.
It might have helped.





David
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 12:11 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
David - that little boy was probably sound asleep when that guy turned on him. At least I hope so.
When did he kill him? Wasn't it Tuesday night? Do they know for sure?
What I read made it sound like he made it through Monday night and Tuesday. Then the police went to the guy's house at 3:00 am in the morning that Wednesday.
It just boggles the mind if how just so many of the slightest circumstances had changed- if they'd tracked that dentist down just a few hours sooner, that little boy would still be alive and safe at home with his family.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 12:23 pm
@aidan,
aidan wrote:
David - that little boy was probably sound asleep when that guy turned on him.
Is there EVIDENCE of that ???
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 12:55 pm
@aidan,
as of now it's still not fully known when Leiby wa killed. It may have been in the early hours by Monday night or even by Tuesday afternoon. There was an early report from someone where Levi Aron worked and the person said Aron had seemed to have trimmed his beard and cleaned up on Tuesday so he may have already committed the crime. (not sure if it was before or after he left the office briefly that the clean and shave had happened).

http://brooklyn.ny1.com/content/top_stories/142891/alleged-killer-of-brooklyn-boy-to-undergo-psychiatric-evaluation

By the time that the story was breaking Wednesday early, they were indicationing they (the police) went to Aron's home and he directed them towards the kitchen where they found the gruesome sights. He had come and gone from his home while neighbors had conducted a search of the area, and had disposed of body parts blocks away from home.

We all are speculating so far on the time line, Leiby may have become scared and screamed on Monday evening or early Tuesday morning and was then smothered and killed to keep him quiet or he may have been sleeping and was smothered then as Aron realized things didn't look good if he were found to have the child, after which Aron behaved in an even more disturbing way.





0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 01:15 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
dave,

you are advocating arming (heavily, I might add) all traveling 8 year olds?


Really...?
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 01:26 pm
@Rockhead,
Yes, in fact he initially stated that at the age of 8 he skipped around town with his trusty .38 revolver.

(2nd page this thread, post 9 or 10 on the page)

www.able2know.org/topic/174521-2#post-4665634

"Thay said that there was no evidence of any sexual abuse,
which leaves his motive unidentified, except that he said
that he "paniced."

Perhaps, in time, he will be more forthcoming qua his reason.
It was with that sort of thing in mind that I always carried
a .38 revolver, when I was his age.
"


It was then that he lost all credibility.
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 01:39 pm
@Sturgis,
I think he should spend some time with a group of 3rd graders and see how many he wants armed in his neighborhood...
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 01:55 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:
I think he should spend some time with a group of 3rd graders
and see how many he wants armed in his neighborhood...
That already happened in Arizona when I was in that grade.
It was from them that I obtained my first functional gun.
Thay were very plentiful; we never had any trouble, nor complaints.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 01:58 pm
@Sturgis,
Sturgis wrote:
Yes, in fact he initially stated that at the age of 8
he skipped around town with his trusty .38 revolver.

(2nd page this thread, post 9 or 10 on the page)

www.able2know.org/topic/174521-2#post-4665634

"Thay said that there was no evidence of any sexual abuse,
which leaves his motive unidentified, except that he said
that he "paniced."

Perhaps, in time, he will be more forthcoming qua his reason.
It was with that sort of thing in mind that I always carried
a .38 revolver, when I was his age.
"


It was then that he lost all credibility.
Maybe I'll worry about "credibility" when I find a need to convince "Sturgis" of anything.

Maybe he thinks I shoud re-write history to HIS liking,
or just conceal it.





David
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 02:02 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
that was like 100 years ago.

today's 3rd graders aren't the thoughtful states rights advocates that you and Henry Ford were...
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 02:04 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:
that was like 100 years ago.

today's 3rd graders aren't the thoughtful states rights advocates that you and Henry Ford were...
R u alleging a negative, atavistic, mass mutation ?
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 02:05 pm
Imagine Chuckee Cheeses with pistols and live ammunition.

I don't think so, Charlie Brown...
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 02:09 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:
Imagine Chuckee Cheeses with pistols and live ammunition.

I don't think so, Charlie Brown...
U have your IMAGINATION.

I have my MEMORY of what happened: no trouble
during the 5 years that I lived there.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 03:58 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:
dave,

you are advocating arming (heavily, I might add) all traveling 8 year olds?


Really...?
I am very, very pleased -- thrilled-- by the fact
that I don't have any kids. If I DID, then I 'd be confronted
with a decision about his personal defenses.

That is a very INDIVIDUAL decision,
very personal as to the kid himself, the nature of his mind.
This is NOT the first time that something like this has happened.

I woud not put a loaded revolver into the hands of a chimpanzee
and there are humen for whose minds I have little more respect,
but I will NOT attaint the minds of America 's children thusly, en masse,
as U wish to do.
You are hitting them below the belt; naked prejudice.
There survives a letter from Thomas Jefferson
to his 12 year old nephew, wherein he counsels
the boy to take his gun with him when he goes out for a walk.

When I was 8, and on many occasions since then,
I have been in the presence of armed children
(mostly at gunnery ranges). Thay were calm; not stupid.
I never saw anything objectionable happen,
tho I must admit that accidents can and do happen
under any circumstance.
Children shoud be trained in the public schools
in the competent & accurate use of defensive firearms,
the same as thay are taught to swim.

MY position is simply that there is NO age limit
in the 2nd Amendment; every citizen has an EQUAL right
to defend his life from the predatory violence of man or beast.
Whoever DENIES that,
takes the position that a juvenile victim of violence
must, by law, offer himself up for the slaughter of
any predator of superior force, because of the victim's age;
i.e., that is saying that the death penalty shoud apply
to being young (in the discretion of a violent predator).



I woud restore the status quo ante before gun control.
The right to bear arms, defensively,
has been put beyond the reach of government by the Founders of this Republic.





David
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 04:02 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
and I don't wanna get shot because people not mature enough to carry loaded guns in public wish to do so.

more of them every day.

makes me glad I live in the country like Jefferson's nephew.

more worry from bears than gun toting citizens...


PS...

I am also thrilled that you don't have offspring.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 08:16:49