@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
joefromchicago wrote:
I'm confused. George W. Bush said it wasn't important whether we got Bin Laden or not. When did it become important again?
Apparently when the intelligence services, perhaps using enhanced techniques, got a tip from a prisioner in Guantanamo - which the hapless Obama three years ago promised to close without delay - and the lead was recognized as important in Obama's enhanced assassination program in Afghanistan & Pakistan.
This construction implies that the closing of Gitmo would have led these prisoners to have been let go, or somehow be beyond our control; but that's an incorrect proposition, as Obama was proposing to transfer these detainees to different facilities, not simply release all of them.
It's a lot more likely that one of the captives was successfully turned to our side, not through torture - why **** around with pretty words?? - but through more effective, long-established techniques of psychological coercion.
Cycloptichorn