No, it really doesn't say that.
An armed citizenry is hardly a guarantee against tyranny, since people could freely elect a tyrant if they wished.
And hand-held weapons are hardly an effective defense against a foreign power intent on tyrannical rule — that's why we have professional armed forces.
You try to make it sound as if there's only one possible interpretation; in truth, it's ambiguous.
Okay, and why can't I buy a machine gun?
Because the design of the AR15 is basically the same as the military assault version it can be quickly converted to automatic.
The courts, the legislature, the manufacture all agree that semi-automatic assault weapons are assault weapons nothing else makes sense.
The point is that allowing import of assault weapons from around the world puts even more weapons of war on the street.
Any idiot found at the scene of mass murderer with a gun in his hand would be killed by the police.
Besides it would become a circular firing squad as one idiot would shoot the next idiot with a gun who would then be shot by some other idiot because he saw that idiot shoot the other gun nut.
There is a reason they say leave the policing to the police.
A knife is usually a woman's weapon
The high body count random mass murders are not done with knives.
a ban on assault weapons would do far more because there are far more of them on the streets.
You might think you know more about guns but you can't seem to identify an assault weapon.
We know for a fact that the Pulse mass murderer exceed the rate of fire of the Las Vegas mass murderer's rate with a semi-automatic assault weapon by nearly 30% without a bump stock.
When you get a number that goes from 500,000 to 2.5 million it worthless because it is not remotely close. At best it is a guestimate.
...do tell how many times that someone has converted their semiautomatic rifle to an automatic rifle and used it in a mass shooting...
You're speaking from hysteria.
Quote:...do tell how many times that someone has converted their semiautomatic rifle to an automatic rifle and used it in a mass shooting...
I never claimed that anyone did that. I was responding to the statement that there's no such things as an automatic AR15 and saying that it was possible to do. I didn't say that it was a problem or that it was easy for anyone to do but a technically knowledgeable person could do it pretty quickly with the right parts.
Quote:You're speaking from hysteria.
No, I'm just stating a commonly known fact about the AR15 — you're the defensive one who's speaking from hysteria.
I didn't say that it was a problem
The courts, the legislature, the manufacture all agree that semi-automatic assault weapons are assault weapons nothing else makes sense.
A regular semi-automatic rifle does not resemble an assault weapon.
The semi-automatic version of the AR-15 is identical to the automatic version with the exception of the automatic triggering mechanism.
The assault weapon only banned their sale and did not make owning an assault weapon a crime. So, most potential school mass murders had only to go to daddy gun cabinet to get their assault weapon.
The is the law of the land passed by duly elected members of both parties.
The point is that allowing import of assault weapons from around the world puts even more weapons of war on the street.
Any idiot found at the scene of mass murderer with a gun in his hand would be killed by the police.
Besides it would become a circular firing squad as one idiot would shoot the next idiot with a gun who would then be shot by some other idiot because he saw that idiot shoot the other gun nut.
There is a reason they say leave the policing to the police. Even police form circular firing squads and they are trained.
A knife is usually a woman’s weapon and most knife killings are domestic disputes where the woman is being beaten up and she gets her hands on a butcher knife.
The high body count random mass murders are not done with knives.
Do you really believe that no NRA members have killed people?
Some gun manufactures automatically enroll the purchaser in the NRA.Quote:
If they want to be members, they still have to submit their application, they just get a free 1 year membership coupon in the box, nothing automatic about it. BTW, how many total manufactures do this? Do you even know how many gun makers there are in the US? I think the total # would surprise you.
Quote:So, when a mass murderer goes to purchase his assault weapon he is enrolled in the NRA. It is free.
You still have to prove that any of these shooters were NRA members. If they were, the media would have found out and made sure the populace knew, they are not friends of the NRA and will report anything bad about them in a heartbeat. You must have done a search because you would have posted something by now. You are conspiracy theorist as well as a propagandist.
Quote:Common sense tells you that NRA gun nuts are the most likely people to be involved in murders because they have the main ingredient of murder, a gun.
He we go again moving those goal posts from mass shooters to just plain murder. You can't even have an honest discussion on this subject. The main ingredient of murder isn't a gun, it's a lack of good will towards your fellow humans. Guns are just a tool, they are not bad, people are bad. The only time a person doesn't get blamed for their crime is when they have a gun. No one blames the knife, the baseball bat or the fists/feet of other killers. Your argument has no common sense.
Quote:The book “Mass Murderers does not list NRA members because the NRA keeps the members list top secret like the KKK does.
It doesn't list them because there have been no mass murders that were NRA members. I know people who are NRA members, they get lots and lots of mail from the NRA, if even 1 mass shooter was an NRA member, there would have been plenty of proof in their homes and on their computers, this is the digital age, everyone uses email.
Quote:The gun regulations on the Thompson Sup Machine changed America a ban on assault weapons would do far more because there are far more of them on the streets.
It wasn't that regulation that had the major effect, there were still plenty of automatic guns in the streets already at that time. It was the 1986 restriction which had an impact. You can still own a fully automatic rifle, but it can't be newer than 1986 and takes a license from the govt to own it. All this did was make them rare and expensive, but you can still own one. Good luck finding one for under 15k. The only thing I don't like about this regulation is the fact it limits them to 1986 and older, that's BS and makes it so only wealthy people can own them. They should keep the restrictions but allow modern day weapons to be purchased, it would bring down the cost and allow the average Joe to own one as well. In your war against the wealthy, don't you want the people to to win?
Quote:You are the one that said it would take 2 seconds to aim. Looking through the site of a gun is like looking through binoculars it is disorienting.
Ever used iron sites on a semi-auto rifle, or have you only looked through the glass of a hunting rifle scope? Ever looked through a red dot sight or an ACOG? Most of these shooters weren't using hunting scopes, they were using iron sites and maybe a red dot. Keep proving you have no idea what your talking about.
Quote:Looking through the site of a gun is like looking through binoculars it is disorienting. You have to look without the binoculars to get them in the right place. While you focus your sight through the gun site other desperate people are coming after to you.
You are comparing long distance target shooting to someone using an AR in a mass shooting event? You really are clueless aren't you.
Quote:The results of that Triathlon are posted on line I managed to beat half the field and finished 2nd in my age group and that guy was 9 years younger.
Congratulations on your good health and endurance. You are in much better shape then I am. I often mentioned to the wife that we need to start moving around more, neither one of us is over weight, I'm 5' 9" 175 lbs and she's 5'6" about 125 lbs. and we are in our mid 40's. We are doing much better then some of the people we went to school with but we need to do better.
Keep up the good work, I'm sure your grandchildren will enjoy having their grandparents around for many years.
Quote:The point was the trigger finger could be conditioned to fire much faster and longer than you can even imagine.
Sure it can, but no one that is going on such a shootng spree is going to be thinking about such things. If sure the MSM is dumb enough to mention such things, they will encourge someone to do so, but that's the idiot MSM for you, they enjoy the self-full-filling prophecies. The more they talk about and promote mass shooting stories, the more they spread the idea and encourge it. Even the FBI has told them that this is exactly how you get more mass shooters. Like a serial killer, they want the fame and the media with their stupid antics will provide it for them. Thus making the next shooter want to out do the previous one.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/10/media-inspires-mass-shooters-copycats/
Quote:The site with the Columbine security tapes shows the mass murderer taking the shot and the bomb does not explode.Quote:
So they missed, it proves that you don't always hit what you are shooting at, it proves nothing about whether a mass shooter is aiming their weapon or shooting from the hip as you claim a pistol grip makes easier to do.
Quote:You might think you know more about guns but you can’t seem to identify an assault weapon.
That's because an assault weapon has a selective rife switch and semi-auto rifles are not "assault weapons". Watch the video in the posted link above again if you need a lesson on semi-auto rifles.
Quote:We know for a fact that the Pulse mass murderer exceed the rate of fire of the Las Vegas mass murderer’s rate with a semi-automatic assault weapon by nearly 30% without a bump stock.
Where did this fact come from?
Quote:Maybe you can show mass murderers firing from the shoulder.
Every video ever released of a mass shooter event shows them firing from the shoulder. It was you who tried to claim differently and can't prove their claim.
Quote:The three highest body count mass murderers have taken place in the last two years. That is a Trend and it is going upward.
I don't think it's a trend, the average person is getting better at reporting people, the police and FBI are getting better at responding to reports of possible concern.
Quote:That is every gang member and drug dealer in America using guns to defend themselves and of course that is debatable.
That is the weakest one you have come up with yet. These are reports from the average gun owner, not gang members. You have just revealed yourself as a bigot and a fraud.
Quote:Along with the wives defending themselves from their husbands and husbands defending themselves from their wives.
Defensive gun use (DGU) is the use or presentation of a firearm for self-defense, defense of others or in some cases, protecting property.
Don't limit the use to only things you think should count. You watch way to much ID and use that as some basis of fact. They use sensational cases for broadcast that don't follow the average crime rate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use
Unlike you, I provide proof of my claims.
Quote:These are the people that defend themselves with guns. And who are they defending themselves from? Another gun nut with a gun. When you get a number that goes from 500,000 to 2.5 million it worthless because it is not remotely close. At best it is a guestimate.
See my above link for different takes on the DGU stats. Your personal bias and bigotry suggests that just because someone owns a gun, that they are a gun nut.
Quote:That does not violate any constitutional right that simply makes sure guns do not get into the hands of people who should not have them.
It actually does, it places an undo burden on the person who has a Constitutional right to own a gun. From the sounds of it, you think only wealthy people should have the ability to own weapons, they are the only ones who can afford to go through all those steps and then afford the massive fee's and insurances it would cost to follow such a plan.
Quote:You have to be qualified to drive a car you should have to be qualified to own a gun.
Here we go again, driving isn't a Constitutional right, it's a state granted privilege. There is a massive difference between a granted privilege and a Constitutional Right, why do you leftists always seem to confuse the two? Shall not be infringed.
Does that make sense to you?
Of all the thousands and thousands of laws passed every year only a tiny fraction will ever reach the Supreme Court.
To contest a law before the Supreme Court you have to make a case that the law violates the Constitution. A law banning assault weapons is within the bounds of our constitution and this is a good reason why the NRA never bought a case before the Supreme Court contesting the 1994 assault weapon ban.
It is not cosmetic it is the same exact construction with the exception of three small parts.
Your video was just meant to mislead the public, that was not a AR-15 or an ak-47.
That won’t chamber bullets at a 900 rounds per minute rate which is causing much of the problem.
And a lot of school shooters were below the age to purchase a gun including some as young as 11 years old.
Society gets to decide what the laws through their elected representatives as long as it is not unconstitutional. We know what the second amendments says “a right to bare arms” there is no constitutional right to bare a specific arm.
It does not matter what the stock is made of it how the gun is designed. If it was designed to kill large numbers of people rapidly that makes it an assault weapon.
Most of the mass murders aren’t shot by the police because they killed themselves.
They are on a suicide mission. The ones that are caught is because they are out of amo or their gun jammed. The Columbine mass murderers killed themselves. Police killed the Akron mass murderer in 30 seconds.
Even highly trained police have formed circular firing squads a few weeks ago a policeman was killed by another policeman on a call. Taking a class is nothing close to the reality of making split second decision in a life and death situation.
When number of policemen are called to location from coming from different direction it is easy to form a circular firing squad. I can just tell you the facts of what happened.
Knives are widely considered to be a woman’s weapon. In fact, there was a case on ID tonight and it was a woman doing the killing. Knives are weapons of opportunity while mass murderers armed with assault weapons plan their killing for years.
I will guarantee you for a fact that some NRA members are mass shooters. [/quote
You have failed to prove it for going on over a month now. If you were going to prove it you would have done by now. Instead you give an empty "guarantee" that you know you won't be able to prove.
[quote]To believe that gun nuts don’t shoot people is absurd. The mass murderer buying their assault weapons are automatically made NRA members when they buy their assault weapons by some gun manufacturers.
That easy there are way too many gun manufactures in America. When something is free most people take advantage of it.
hy do you think the NRA keeps their membership top secret?
They don’t want the public to know how many killings, suicides, children shot coming home late. It would really open your eyes to how many gun crimes are committed by NRA members. Get the NRA to publish their membership list.
There is only one way to find out how many mass murderers were NRA members that is make the NRA publish their membership list anything else is pure speculation on your part. That is the same way of having good will toward your car without tools you could never fix it.Quote:
As explained, the NRA keeps these list private because of people like you and other anti-gun zealots who would harass people into either quit or publishing their info in news papers, like was almost done by newspapers in the past. People have a right to privacy, it's in the Constitution.
Quote:There is absolutely no way to know whether and mass murderers were NRA members the NRA wants to make sure no one finds out either. Mass murderers destroy everything they don’t want people to know.
The anti-gun media would find out the info and publish it in a heartbeat. As I said, people get lots of mail and email from the NRA, it wouldn't be hard to find out when an investigation started on a shooter. No reports of NRA mass shooters means that none of the mass shooters were NRA members. NONE!
Quote:I watched the video but that was not an AR-15 and it would not fire at a 900 a minute rate.
The AR does not fire that fast, stop lying. Only fully automatic rifles fire that fast. This article talks about the fact's when a leftist politician lied on national TV and wasn't correct by the friendly anti-gun media.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/house-dem-claims-ar-15-can-fire-700-rounds-per-minute
Quote:Do you know that Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook, mass murder regularly edited Wikipedia? The public in general can edit Wikipedia and in this case the gun lobby has a motive to distort that article.
When you can't prove your point, you make stuff up. It isn't so easy to alter a Wikipedia page any longer. Get with the modern day, and stop referencing things from over 10 years ago. The site has changed alot in the last decade.
Quote:If you had given your statistic professor those stats he would have thrown you out of class.
That's what would happen with 90% of the claims you make on this page. No proof, no fact's, just opinion. I've at least provided links and facts to back my case, you have opinion and an uneducated opinion at that.
Quote:How high is the price for 20 first graders? How much is the cost of a life?
Sorry to tell you this, but my Constitutional rights are more important to me than weak your appeal to emotion. Keep the virtue signaling for your side of the aisle.
Quote:We give drivers tests to protect the other drivers by seeing if they are competent drivers. Why should there not be license to own a gun. It doesn’t prevent one from owning a gun it just insures they know how to properly use it.
I'll explain it again so even the slow kids in the back can understand. Driving is a privilege, owning a gun is a Constitutional Right. Get it yet? You won't get it, you don't believe in the Constitution.
The Constitution does not give you a right to bare any gun, it is simply a right to bare arms.
The second amendment is extremely clear as what your right is, "a right to bare arms" gives you only that right and nothing more, if you have a musket or a BB gun that condition is fulfilled. Activist judges have read far more into the second amendment then is there.
The AR-15 was designed for one type hunting alright, hunting humanbeings.
Words have meaning but they do not have meaning beyond those words. “A right to bare arms” is just that and nothing more. The founding fathers left the question of what arms open.
The Founding Fathers did leave us a way to update the constitution by amending it. For instance, the NRA could propose a Constitutional Amendment saying that the public has a right to bare assault weapons but it would take two thirds of the states for it to pass it.
The right loves to campaigns against activist judges but decisions on the 2nd Amendment are some of the most activist decision in history ruling an entire book of privileges based on 5 little words. What were actually privileges and subject to the laws of the land were casts as rights by activist judges.
You read far more into those five little words than was ever imagined by the founding fathers even in their wildest dreams.
When ArmaLife set down to a drawing board to design the AR-15 they did not say what America needs now is a good varmint gun. They sat out to design a vastly superior weapon of war to hunt humans with. Objects primarily designed for one purpose can be used for other than the designed purpose but that does not change what they were designed for.
The book of laws that I enforced was five inches thick and new laws were written at city council meeting. It was difficult to keep up with because we often did not get our books updated. This goes on all over America at a city, county, state, and Federal levels. I doubt anyone has an exact count of the number of laws in America.
The right always wants a strict interpretation of the Constitution and “right to bare arms” clearly does not say the right to bare assault weapons. As long as you have an arm to bare that is all the Constitutional rights you have.
Not all semi-automatics are alike and they are all not the same size.
You can put anything in a box and that is what the wooden stock is just that a container. Putting it in a different container changes nothing.
An AR-15 hidden in a wooden stock
Some do buy their own guns just as the EL Paso mass murderer did but others get them from their father’s gun cabinet.
It is only the trigger mechanism that is changed a semi-automatic can chamber just as fast as the automatic.
One mass murderer went looking for his dad’s AR-15 and could not find it. It was leaning up against his father’s chest of drawers he was within inches and missed it as a result he killed far fewer people.
The Constitution does not give you a right to bare any gun, it is simply a right to bare arms.
It has nothing do with how the assault weapons looks but it has everything to do with how preforms.
You can put it in any box you want it is still how efficiently that it kills that makes the difference.
The Akron mass murder was killed by the police, Adam Lanza, Sandy Hook’s mass murderer committed suicide, the Parkland mass murderer’s gun jammed, the Columbine mass murderers committed suicide. I can name at least another 30 mass murderers who committed suicide. Suicide is hard chickening out is easy.
I can name at least another 30 mass murderers who committed suicide. Suicide is hard chickening out is easy.
Police officer being shot by other police officers is indicative of a circular firing squad.
Training often goes out the window in an actual situation.
You can have all the shooting rooms you want but they are only high-tech video games real life situations are different.
The bullets told the facts.
Bullets don’t make guesstimates and they travel in straight lines.
That is true but there is no show called Husbands with Knives.
As long as the NRA keeps their membership list secret it will be impossible for you to prove no NRA member has ever been involved in a mass murder.
That is BS and you know it is not the media job to get the NRA membership list.
What’s free? Your NRA membership when buying an assault weapon.
. That is the cold hard facts as what happens when you own guns to believe NRA members are exempt is foolish. That is just what guns do.
You have a gun why would you be worried about little thing like harassment? You could just shoot them.
The media does not get to go into a mass murderer’s apartment. They do not have subpoena power. They cannot go through his papers or computer however they could find out from the NRA if it was not secret. You are making meaningless claim that you can’t back up.
That is the manufacturer’s spec for the AR-15.
You must admit that is the most absurd statistic I have ever seen. A range of 500% is not a statistic.
You have a Constitutional right only to “bare an arm” not bare a weapon of war.
Bearing an arm may not be privilege but making sure someone is competent to own a gun is the only responsible thing to do.
“A well regulate Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” That only grants a right to bear arms. It does not in any way grant a right to assault weapons designed 200 years in the future. If the founding father had intended to grant a right to all future developments of weapons, they could have specified that and written the people are hereby granted a right to all future developments of guns but they did not. The founding fathers knew that you can only have so much dead hand control of the future.
Wrong those five little words do not grant you the right to weapons designed for wars.
“A right to bear arms is not a right to bare any arms. It preserves the right of public to bear arms but leaves the question of what arms to be the subject of the law.
Courts have already ruled that dangerous and deadly weapons can be banned and nothing is as deadly as assault weapons.
Muskets were quite adequate for militia duty.
The semi-automatic contains 99% of the design improvement of assault weapons
and the mass murderers are making good use of the design improvement to assault weapons.