The Communist Origin of the Modern Conservative Movement VI

You can bare arms all you want but that does not include ammunition. Like they tell you in contract law if it isn’t written down it isn’t there.

Never gas might be far more efficient for self defense than guns. You could wipe out all your enemies and not even have to aim.

Rights are granted by governments.

There are all kinds of government and they do not enjoy the same rights we do. The rights can be changed according to the Constitution. At some point in time the second amendment will be eliminated if the gun nuts have not killed everyone.

You still believe that of all the rights, that the second amendment is the only one that is absolute.

The government now regulates the types of ammunition all that needs to be done is make the already existing regulations tighter.

Even countries have agreed to ban certain types of weapons because they are so effective at killing people. If we had baby beds that had killed a fraction of the people that assault weapons have killed, it would be removed from the market immediately. Why should that standard not apply to assault weapons?

It takes a special kind of person to willfully remain ignorant of the difference between style and function.

We can talk about longbow regulation once some guy kills 50 people with a longbow at a rock concert.

fret about nomenclature

the deadly results of high velocity ammo.

A semi-automatic and assault weapon are two completely different animals.

No semi-automatic can fire at the rate of 900 rounds a minute

and none needs to. There is no reason to shoot a deer 900 times.

The number of deer you can kill is limited so there is no need to kill the whole herd.

The Constitution is silent on assault weapons as they were not invented until over a century after the constitution was written.

The bump stock is just a mechanism to make the AR-15 fire faster

and serves the same purpose as the mechanism in the gun.

If you can ban one you can ban the other.

Semi-automatic might not fire 900 rounds a minute but assault weapons were designed to fire at that rate.

Assault weapons are designed to kill large number of people on the battlefield

they have only one other purpose, mass murder.

There were two shootings over already this week, one in California and one at a Wal Mart. At the Garlic Fest 3 were killed and 11 were wounded and wouldn’t you know it an assault weapon made it possible.

The best approach to solve a problem is to go to the root of the problem and the root of the problem is the mechanism that makes assault weapons capable of firing at a 900 round a minute rate.

Semi-automatics don’t fire 900 rounds a minute

but assault weapons do

and that is the specification listed by the manufacturer.

Just trying pulling your trigger finger as many times as possible and a 450-minute rate is indeed possible.

When firing into a large crowd people occupy most of the space. If you don’t hit the person in the front than you may hit someone in the fifth row back.

Shooting into a large crowd it is impossible to miss.

Someone shooting in the general direction of a crowd will kill far more than someone taking careful aim.

You need that assault weapon firing at 900 round a minute rate. That will make a mess of any crowd.

The firing mechanism in assault weapons is far different than the one in a typical semi-automatic.

That is why the AR-15 was patented. If you don’t make a major improvement you can’t get a patent.

Assault weapons were designed to kill large number of people,

they were not designed to go squirrel hunting with.

If the pistol grip design version of assault weapons was banned mass murders might not stop but the body count would go down.

Can you imagine how awkward it would be to fire a traditional rifle at waists level?

I don’t know about you but if I was facing a large crowd of violent gang members, I would not want a rifle but an assault weapon held at waist height

an assault weapon held at waist height would bring down many gang members

but a rifle at my shoulder would not stop them.

The pistol grip is designed to be held by hands

and offers a much more secure control of the gun.

That may be what it is coming to is locked doors at public building with metal detectors. Our Courthouse has used metal detectors since 9/11. The metal detectors need to in front of a secure metal door.

Machine gun Kelly did not have any trouble robbing banks and few would take him on.

That shooting took place in the Pulse Night Club. The mass murderer could not miss the people were packed in like sardines wherever he shot he hit someone. He did not waste many bullets. There is no doubt it took place that is history.

While a mass murderer was taking aim, someone would take his gun away. Someone taking aim would lose his peripheral vision making him vulnerable to attack. You have to trust the mass murders and with the exception of one shooting from the top of a clock tower none bothered to take careful aim.

While a mass murderer was taking aim, someone would take his gun away. Someone taking aim would lose his peripheral vision making him vulnerable to attack. You have to trust the mass murders and with the exception of one shooting from the top of a clock tower none bothered to take careful aim.

As soon as the deer heard that first shot the rest of the heard would be history.

The guns used by the Las Vegas shooter had pistol grips and for what he was doing were more than likely held with the pistol grips.

The weapons with bump stocks may have been shoulder fired. One was mounted on bipods. Strafe from the shoulder would be much more difficult.

That is the exact reason mass murderers chose assault weapons with pistol grips.

That one shooting in Las Vegas was enough to get bump stocks banned.

Most mass murders where large numbers of people are killed are done with assault weapons.

If your target is a large crowd shooting in the general direction will be more efficient.

The number of kills are proportional to the number of rounds fired.

Strafing from the waist position is much easier.

Pistol grips are like steering wheels on cars they make the car easier to drive.

Weapons of mass destruction are those that kill masses of people.

If there was an accurate body count on assault weapons people would be surprised.

Dead is dead whether you get a bullet in the head in a night club or killed by an atomic bomb.

Weapons of mass destruction kill masses of people and death is death.

A rifle held at shoulder height is not as efficient as one at waist height when it comes to strafing

Missiles were designed to carry a payload whether conventional or atomic.

When our drones fire hells fire missiles there is quite an explosion and many dead people.

We have never had a mass murder using a heavy truck in America.

Knife attacks seldom kill more than one or two

but we are now approaching a mass murder every day in America most using assault weapons.

In a court of law, you will find that if it isn't down. that right that right doesn’t exist.

There is no right to ammunition.

A can of nerve gas thrown at someone feet would be just as effective.

So, you believe that 2600 years ago an absolute right to assault weapons was granted by no doubt a time traveler from the future. It is just a fantasy.

The second amendment may remain but it will never be as broadly interpreted as it is today.

The government will take back its power from the corrupt politicians who are owned by the gun manufacturers. Today on Meet Press they showed how much the Republicans lost in the last election because they are owned by the gun manufacturers. The public is not going to put up with wondering whether their children are going to be blown away at school by some gun nut with an assault weapon. The public is beginning to realize the gun manufacturers have been peddling lies that guns keep people safe when in fact gun owners and their families are the ones most likely to be killed with the gun they own.

Any time that you believe that you have an absolute right to the most terrible weapons of war and that the government cannot restrict them in any way you believe that it is the one and only absolute right.

Ammunition is now regulated by the government and as there is no right to ammunition it is up to the government. Of course, you can always use black powder and a lead ball.

Pistol grips may not have caused any deaths but thousands have been killed with assault weapons.

Weapons of war have no place on the streets of America.

Most of the mass murderers who succeed in killing large numbers of people use assault weapons. Only the shooter at Virginia Tech succeeded in killing a large number of people with a hand gun and he did it by chaining the doors shut.

A doctor from El Paso commented that they had not seen people with such massive wounds since they treated soldiers on the battle field of Iraq and Afghanistan the exit wounds were the size of baseballs from assault weapons.

Assault weapons are not designed to only shoot people they are designed to destroy them.

The problem we are trying to stop is shootings where 59 people are shot and another 500 wounded. A couple that had been wounded in Las Vegas was on the evening news the husband had been grazed but the wife was shot three times one was in her face.

That is what assault weapons are designed for, mass murder.

Every time you see a picture of mass murderers’ weapon it has a pistol grip.

Not one mass murder in America has been done with a German MG-42. That gun was designed as a machine gun and is much heavier than an AR-15 you need a bipod to support when it is fired. The lighter design of an AR-15 makes it much easier to do mass shooting with.

If you had a semi-automatic that only fired six rounds a minute it would not be considered an assault weapon

and most semi-automatics are not classified as assault weapons

The pistol grip does not make a gun an assault weapon.

You need to talk the doctors who treated the thirty wounded people in El Paso and tell them how harmless the features of assault weapons are.

Ar-15s are considered assault weapons with or without pistol grips

any gun that can fire at 900 round a minute rate is considered an assault weapon.

Semi-automatic don’t fire at a 900 rounds a minute rate but assault weapons do.

The factory specification given for an AR-15 is a 900 rounds a minute rate.

All these mass murderers want pistol grips

no mass murderer every used a traditional rifle style AR-15 there must be a reason why.

The right to bear arms in no way prohibits any feature from being banned as long as there is an arm to bear the Constitution requirement has been met in fulfilled.

We are talking about banning far more than pistol grips

an assault weapon is a weapon of war.

If the mass murder rate is far lower when there is an assault weapon but soars to new heights when it expired it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that banning assault weapons works.

Why can’t you call an assault weapon and assault weapon instead of a pistol grip?

Assault weapons are designed for one purpose, mass murder.

Pistol grips are not being banned assault weapons are being banned.

You can still put a pistol grip on a shot gun.

The pistol grips are just added to weapons of war to make killing large numbers of people easy.

No, assault weapons are designed to fire at a 900 rounds a minute rate and then the handle is designed.

Not one person I know of hunts with an assault weapon because they are no notoriously inaccurate,

they need to be shot into large crowds to be effective.

Anyone can tell the difference in a single gunshot or rapid gun fire of an assault weapons.

WV is one of the biggest hunting states in America and in hunting season it sounds like a war going on but you don’t hear assault weapons being used.

The second amendment is not an absolute right and never has been.

This is a democracy where the majority of citizens will determine what type guns will be allowed on the streets and what guns will be banned.

That way America was designed to work all rights have limits, there are no unlimited rights.

All the gun nuts should be required to watch films of the bodies of children with baseball size exit wounds and explain why they think that needs to have assault weapons on the streets.

Most of our police cars have shot guns I use to install the racks there might be one assault weapon in a supervisor car.

The only criminals who uses bullet proof vests are the mass murderers because they know they are going out to kill people.

Even if the vest stopped the shot gun blast it would knock all the air out of the shooter. Just because it stops the bullet doesn’t mean that they are not injured.

The Constitution says absolutely nothing about pistol grips.

If the founding fathers would have wanted to prohibited the banning of pistol grips, they would have to have put it in writing.

The pistol grips are a factor, they make the gun much easier to hold and make the shooter much more manurable while he is killing people.

Say assault weapons it is an assault weapon ban not a pistol grip ban.

A right to bare-arms is not a right to bare weapons of war.

Violating people right to live is far more serious violation of rights, it dims in comparison.

The mass murders with the biggest lose of life all used assault weapons.

The assault weapons used in mass murders are the same gun as the military uses with only a few pars changed.

The gun still has all the capabilities the military assault weapons have you just have to pull the trigger more frequently.

I don’t think the school back packs use Kevlar it looked like a metal plates that the bullets from the assault weapons penetrated. These metal plates are really heavy.

We can only expect kindergarteners to carry so much weight so gun nuts can fire bullets in the backyard.

So in other words, the mere fact of something having been used in warfare is not justification for outlawing it.

As you say, pistol grips were not a factor in any of these deaths.

But you want to ban all semiautomatic guns, don't you?