House of Reps. member Giffords shot in Arizona today

You have it completely 180 degrees wrong. By falsely accusing conservatives, it is the liberal Democrats that want conservatives to shut up. That is obvious, or they would not be out there falsely accusing every time something happens.

Sorry Bill, but we have a right to defend ourselves and point out liberal demagoguery every time it happens, which is often. In case you missed it or did not read it, here is the article again, Bill. I challenge you to do it. Have the courage to face the truth, and you can start by reading the facts that Michelle Malkin wrote in her article.

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2011/01/14/malkin-blame-righty-a-condensed-history/

Okie do you study all the news from around the world or do you only study that which I allow not to be censored in your own country?
If you lived in china would you be ok with news that I allow?
What if you lived in North korea would you still except the news that I allow to be true.

You do feel safe in your own country just as others that live in other countries?

Do not most of the citizens in other countries except the news that is shared with them to be close to correct? Do not all countries have their national anthem and say that they are free regardless if they are socialist, communist or democratic?

reasoning logic, I don't mean to offend, but your post does not seem to be logical. Also, your spelling is pretty bad, you might wish to brush up on that.

That said, I will try to answer your questions. No, I do not study all of the news around the world, because for at least one reason, I don't have time for it. Secondly, I am not aware that "you," whoever you are, have any power to censor the news here. And your questions about North Korea and China make no sense. I think the authorities there, not you, control the "news" reporting there. I feel relatively safe, yes. Your last question, saying you are free does not make it so.

In some situations, it would be considered a death threat. If he calmed down after the initial outburst and acted like he had some sense, they probably would have released him outside... I don't know what happened.

As it turns out, you're probably right. But I can see how he could have gotten aggravated by someone who was saying it's premature to talk about gun control and deciding to demonstrate how much potential damage can be done to anyone at any time.

Ok thanks for being honest and you are correct in much of what you said I have no power, I was just trying to get you to think about what I was saying. Please go a little more indepth about what I shared with you if you would. thanks Reasoning logic

JTT, it is difficult to take your posts seriously when you apparently get your information from a known radical socialist or communist sympathizer, Noam Chomsky.

says the guy that gets his from Rush Limbozo...

So I take it that you do not enjoy linguistics?

I haven't listened to Rush lately very much, because I tire of hearing him pound on the same obvious points repeatedly. By the way, I saw somewhere that Loughner also named Chomsky as one of his reading materials. First of all, how come this is not being published in the mainstream press now? And secondly, if true, maybe the guy would have been better off with better sources of news commentary, such as Rush.

No, but I do appreciate proper spelling of words.

Yes I can se where someone might want to compare Rush to Jesus!

So I can count on you for correction of my misspelling? Thanks!

Your statement is illogical. You might want to change your online name here to something other than "reasoning logic."

How about if I change it to Okie2, Then I would be more intellectual correct?

That's refreshingly American of you, Okie. I thought that people in the US had freedom of thought and the freedom to express that thought.

Weren't you just chastising Bill for what you perceive to be liberals telling conservatives to shut up. Let me check, ... , ... yes, you wrote;

By falsely accusing conservatives, it is the liberal Democrats that want conservatives to shut up. That is obvious, or they would not be out there falsely accusing every time something happens.

Sorry Bill, but we have a right to defend ourselves and point out liberal demagoguery every time it happens, which is often. In case you missed it or did not read it, here is the article again, Bill. I challenge you to do it. Have the courage to face the truth, and you can start by reading the facts that Michelle Malkin wrote in her article.

And you even challenged him to read an article by a renowned liar who just happens in this case to be a right wing nut.

Just what facts laid out by Professor Chomsky do you dispute?

you don't actually think that okie has read any Chomsky, do you...?

I do not think that he has, why would he when he has enjoyed propaganda all his life?

Here, folks, is an example of a leftist radical's opinion. He accuses Michelle Malkin, a decent and patriotic American, of lying and of being a right wing nut, but defends a known and verifiable sympathizer of communism, Noam Chomsky.

Regarding your first statement about freedom, I agree that people should have the freedom to express their thoughts, but I think others have just as much right to point out how and when those thoughts are wrong. Such was the case recently when liberal politicians and commentators jumped to conclusions about the motivations of the crime in Arizona. I strongly believe it is incumbent upon us to point out the fallacies and errors of that rhetoric, and we deserve better from a "mainstream" press that claims to give us factual news about events, when in fact they do a pretty poor job of it.

Regarding Chomsky, I am not going to engage you about him, as I don't believe he is a credible source for anything. I have read just enough about him to know it would be a waste of time to read more. It would be similar to me trying to find things that Hugo Chavez or Fidel Castro have said, in an effort to find things that are wrong. That would be a futile endeavor and a waste of time in my opinion.

Oh no, are you another Chomsky follower or fan? If so, that would explain your posts here.