63
   

House of Reps. member Giffords shot in Arizona today

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  4  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:10 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

spendius wrote:
If everybody was peaceful and there was no gun crime Dave's real reason
for his obsession would be exposed. He needs the shooters.
What is the "real reason" ??
Inquiring minds wanna know.



Per your own admission, guns became at an early age a device with which to help you deal with crushing insecurity. A mental crutch. Instead of developing normally - that is to say, learning to confront the problems of life without resorting to a weapon of violence - you had an abnormal development. This is the most likely reason you have such crazy opinions and behaviors to this day.

Cycloptichorn
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:14 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Quote:

Quote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

If you don't want people to think you're obsessed with guns,

I never said I don 't.
Cycloptichorn wrote:
In that case, don't be surprised when many here dismiss your views entirely. Because most people have a dim opinion of those who are obsessed with guns. It's a sign of a problem, David. Not a normal thing at all.

Cycloptichorn
The ONLY thing that matters
is that freedom, clarity and accuracy are dominant in the USSC.

Idle discussion is of no consequence;
no more than if u express your hopes n wishes
for which group will win athletic competition n get a trophy.





David
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:18 pm
I think it's banging on a pan with Mom's baking spoon in infancy. The large effect for minimum effort.

The proper definition of sadism is control of the environment by the ego. Elaborate landscape gardening for example. When the effort is minimal it is cheapskate.

If there is a sexual component it is called algolagnia.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:26 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

spendius wrote:
If everybody was peaceful and there was no gun crime Dave's real reason
for his obsession would be exposed. He needs the shooters.
What is the "real reason" ??
Inquiring minds wanna know.

Cycloptichorn wrote:
Per your own admission, guns became at an early age
a device with which to help you deal with crushing insecurity.
I never said that.
That is your liberal distortion of what I said;
(I was a bit uneasy qua self-defense, when I was home alone a lot.)
U r not a good psychologist; sloppy.


Cycloptichorn wrote:
A mental crutch.
That 's better.


Cycloptichorn wrote:
Instead of developing normally - that is to say,
It was very normal. We all had plenty of guns in Arizona.
We all loved them.




Cycloptichorn wrote:
learning to confront the problems of life
There were no problems;
nothing to confront.



Cycloptichorn wrote:
without resorting to a weapon of violence - you had an abnormal development.
Nonsense.




Cycloptichorn wrote:
This is the most likely reason you have such crazy opinions and behaviors to this day.

Cycloptichorn
My opinions are those of Original Americanism, rejecting liberal collectivism.
MY opinions are winners; yours are losers.





David
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:29 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Quote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

without resorting to a weapon of violence - you had an abnormal development.

Nonsense.


It's not nonsense. But I don't expect you to understand at all.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:35 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
I think it's banging on a pan with Mom's baking spoon in infancy.
The large effect for minimum effort.
I never did that at any age; sounds irritating.


spendius wrote:
The proper definition of sadism is control of the environment by the ego.
I deny that. What evidence have u that it is so ?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:38 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
However, if the Obama Administration took this opportunity to implement regulations that shut down conservative talk radio, it would be different.


he should be advocating to have liberal talk radio shut down, that stuff is pathetic, at least the right wing nuts are entertaining


Well this isn't directed at talk radio, just free speech.

New Bill Targets Gun-Related Images, Speech

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/462240-New_Bill_Targets_Gun_Related_Images_Speech.php

Quote:
Rep. Bob Brady (D-Pa.) says he is working on a bill to make it a federal crime to use "language or symbols" that could be interpreted as inciting violence against a member of Congress, he told CNN in an interview.


Who will be doing the interpreting?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  3  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:38 pm
@McTag,
McTag wrote:

Tea Party democracy:
I disagree with you, and if I cannot get enough of my fellow citizens to join with me and vote you out, I will shoot you dead.


Absolute and utter tripe.
spendius
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:39 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
There was no law in original Americanism. Power grew out of the barrel of a gun.

That's what Pat Garret and Billy the Kid is all about. The change over to the rule of law. Power to the penman, slick talker and coalition maker. Voting instead of fighting. Civilisation.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:41 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
McTag wrote:
Tea Party democracy:
I disagree with you,
and if I cannot get enough of my fellow citizens
to join with me and vote you out, I will shoot you dead.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Absolute and utter tripe.
Maybe its possible that he 's making a joke.





David
spendius
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:42 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Rep. Bob Brady (D-Pa.) says he is working on a bill to make it a federal crime to use "language or symbols" that could be interpreted as inciting violence against a member of Congress, he told CNN in an interview.


What about the rest of Americans?
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:59 pm
@sozobe,
Quote:
His booking photo... yikes. If it were from a TV show or movie I'd say the actor was way overdoing the whole insanity thing. He looks absolutely demented.


Yet, his preliminary hearing show a young man in control and fully understanding what was going. He was polite and deferential to the Judge and the legal system. Go figure?
0 Replies
 
peter jeffrey cobb
 
  4  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:05 pm
My condolences to all afected by this terrible tragedy. My prayers are with yall. I belive it might be time to focus on prevetion of future incidents such as this. I have several topics wich address research and hopefull someday cure for some mental illnesses. If we could, as society look at some of these topics, I believe in the butterfly flapping its wings and cause a hurricane effect..... So maybe...... Someday......... We could prevent One person from comiting such horrific events. Thank You for taking the time to read this.
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:06 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
I wonder how you feel about King's (R-NY) proposal to ban guns within a thousand feet of any lawmaker?

Not just the lefties getting upset over this event apparently

Cycloptichorn
BillW
 
  3  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:09 pm
@H2O MAN,

H2O quote:
Quote:
Re: Joe Nation
That's just ignorant.


Cut you to the bone!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:10 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
I wonder how you feel about King's (R-NY) proposal to ban guns within a thousand feet of any lawmaker?

Not just the lefties getting upset over this event apparently

Cycloptichorn
What ?? U think King is another Goldwater?

King is a RINO lefty.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  3  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:16 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Mr Sig Hil, please get back on your medications, and some sleep would help. You can get up later and love your guns some more!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:20 pm
@djjd62,
If you can call feeling the need to vomit entertaining, that is.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:20 pm
@sozobe,
Quote:
I guess all I'm saying is that we're not at "more likely than not" yet. It's still possible,


All a "more likely than not" says is that there's over a 50% chance that such and such is the case. A speaker could be saying I feel that "51% to 49% that such and such is the case".

A "still possible", ie. "that may be the case", could say pretty much the same thing, with 'may' being the epistemic [level of certainty] modal choice for those situations up to 50%.

0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 01:22 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

McTag wrote:
Tea Party democracy:
I disagree with you,
and if I cannot get enough of my fellow citizens
to join with me and vote you out, I will shoot you dead.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Absolute and utter tripe.
Maybe its possible that he 's making a joke.





David


Maybe, but based on past McTag posts, I don't think so.

If he says he was, I'll apologize.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 08:54:30