63
   

House of Reps. member Giffords shot in Arizona today

 
 
revelette
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:47 am
@farmerman,
I just went to her website, its still there. However, given the circumstances we are learning about tragic shooting Saturday, there really is no connection.



0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:47 am
@OmSigDAVID,
no dave, that's the logical end result of your philosophy.

and I'm sure you can handle coming up with something dumb to say to him...
failures art
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:52 am
My advice on this topic: Turn off the television.

A
R
T
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:52 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Suppose I say something equally dum about u.


Go ahead if you want to, you won't be the first or the last.

Anyway, it was not a foolish thing to say, but totally accurate given every response you have after a shooting occurs.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:58 am
@revelette,
David wrote:
Suppose I say something equally dum about u.
revelette wrote:
Go ahead if you want to, you won't be the first or the last.

Anyway, it was not a foolish thing to say, but totally accurate given every response you have after a shooting occurs.
Hysterical drivel; look, if u wanna say something in particular,
to challenge anything that I said, then do it.
We can discuss it,
but broad, vague pointless denunciation is futile and in vain.

U are just mad because I do n't agree with U.




David
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:58 am
@failures art,
failures art wrote:

My advice on this topic: Turn off the television.

A
R
T


Maybe you could paint your television with a cross-hair and shoot it.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3499/3764967434_b66cd83123.jpg
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:00 am
@OmSigDAVID,
David,

Regarding the gun conversation, see here -

http://able2know.org/topic/166305-38#post-4473856

There's no need to get your panties in a bunch over anything.

Cycloptichorn
Irishk
 
  3  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:07 am
Christina Green's father ... Price of a 'free society'.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/40998602#40998602
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:12 am
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:
no dave, that's the logical end result of your philosophy.
It does u no credit to utter such broad, vague and general statements.

It is easy to disprove that nonsense, to wit:
before the anti-gun frenzy of the mid-1900s forward, what u allege is the result
of my filosofy of laissez faire freedom of gun possession did not occur. Indeed, in Vermont,
which has never had gun laws, it has always
been among the very safest States of America,
according to Annual F.B.I. Statistics.

If your foolishness were accurate,
then lead slugs woud be flying thru the air of Vermont
thicker than mosquitos in a swamp and the same thing
woud have happened in Alaska after it repealed its gun laws.

Q.E.D.




David
Rockhead
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:19 am
@OmSigDAVID,
"and I'm sure you can handle coming up with something dumb to say to him... "



see, that didn't take long...
Setanta
 
  8  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:22 am
The witnesses said that this clown went up to the Congresswoman and shot her, and then turned his gun on the rest of the crowd. Does David suggest she should walk around with a gun in her hand, and shoot down anyone who walks up to her?

That stupidity, which he dragged out at the time of the Virginia Tech tragedy makes two idiotic assumptions. The first is that having a gun in your hand automatically means that you'll use it effectively. The second is that people can see and respond to threats in a fraction of a second. This is real life, not the movies. How many would have been killed and wounded in Tucson if there had been 30 shooters, insteaad of one?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:23 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

David,

Regarding the gun conversation, see here -

http://able2know.org/topic/166305-38#post-4473856

There's no need to get your panties in a bunch over anything.????

Cycloptichorn
I 'm tranquil n serene.
I know that the good guys, the Freedom Lovers, are dominant
in Arizona, in the US Congress and in the USSC.
Happy Days are here again

(Thank u for your concern.)





David
Cycloptichorn
 
  8  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:24 am
@OmSigDAVID,
In that case, why do you keep going on and on about guns? Half of your posts in this thread are about guns and the legality of them.

If you don't want people to think you're obsessed with guns, maybe you should try not talking about them constantly.

Cycloptichorn
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:28 am
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:
"and I'm sure you can handle coming up with something dumb to say to him... "



see, that didn't take long...
Is that an attempt at humor?
I take it that u don 't wish to argue the issue.





David
Rockhead
 
  3  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:36 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I make it a point not to argue with anyone that might shoot me if they get mad.

sad, I know, but necessary in these trying times...
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:37 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
In that case, why do you keep going on and on about guns?
Y the hell NOT??
I LOVE guns and I love to argue about them.
Being serene does not prevent anyone from arguing about guns.



Cycloptichorn wrote:
Half of your posts in this thread are about guns and the legality of them.
SO WHAT ??
I 'm answering other guys' posts on the subject.
There is nothing rong with that.
That is what this forum is for.



Cycloptichorn wrote:
If you don't want people to think you're obsessed with guns,
I never said I don 't.


Cycloptichorn wrote:
maybe you should try not talking about them constantly.

Cycloptichorn
I 'll do what I damn well please.





David
Cycloptichorn
 
  7  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:50 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:

Quote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

If you don't want people to think you're obsessed with guns,

I never said I don 't.


In that case, don't be surprised when many here dismiss your views entirely. Because most people have a dim opinion of those who are obsessed with guns. It's a sign of a problem, David. Not a normal thing at all.

Cycloptichorn
spendius
 
  4  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:03 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
If everybody was peaceful and there was no gun crime Dave's real reason for his obsession would be exposed. He needs the shooters.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:06 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
If everybody was peaceful and there was no gun crime Dave's real reason
for his obsession would be exposed. He needs the shooters.
What is the "real reason" ??
Inquiring minds wanna know.





David
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 12:06 pm
Tea Party democracy:
I disagree with you, and if I cannot get enough of my fellow citizens to join with me and vote you out, I will shoot you dead.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Friends don't let friends fat-talk - Discussion by hawkeye10
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/27/2022 at 07:02:08