63
   

House of Reps. member Giffords shot in Arizona today

 
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Sat 12 Mar, 2011 09:59 am
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
I sure hope that you find that woman of your dreams spendius!


I suspect he already has an inflatable doll.
spendius
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 12 Mar, 2011 04:21 pm
@plainoldme,
That's nothing to what I suspect you of having.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 12 Mar, 2011 04:37 pm
@spendius,
You should humble yourself a little bit more Spendius in your suspicions ! I doubt very seriously that she has a blow up doll of you! LOL
spendius
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 12 Mar, 2011 06:01 pm
@reasoning logic,
Masculine blow up dolls have no wallets. The comparison is ridiculous.
reasoning logic
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 12 Mar, 2011 07:57 pm
@spendius,
Spendius I knew that you were referring to you and your wallet but I did not think that she would be able to handle the truth!
plainoldme
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 12 Mar, 2011 11:04 pm
@reasoning logic,
spendius lacks something you admire . . . logic
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 12:50 am
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
Masculine blow up dolls have no wallets. The comparison is ridiculous.
Maybe a de luxe model 'd have a wallet? (but I defer to your expertise in this matter)
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 05:44 am
Out of respect for Ms Giffords I prefer to leave this rather difficult matter for some other time. I only responded to a sneer from very plainoldme.
plainoldme
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 10:15 am
@spendius,
In your attempt to sneer at me, you made yourself look ridiculous, as usual.
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 10:17 am
@plainoldme,
Is everybody ridiculous who you assert is so or is it just me?
plainoldme
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 11:02 am
@spendius,
Try working on your syntax and you might get an answer.
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 12:43 pm
@plainoldme,
I like doing 5 two-letter words in a row with an alliterative twist and a dash of assonance. And especially with a meaning conveyed efficiently.

You have no answer and you needn't worry about any intelligent A2Kers being taken in on that score by you accusing my syntactical expertise as a stage effect not unlike the gossamer seventh veil.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 01:17 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
I like doing 5 two-letter words in a row with an alliterative twist and a dash of assonance.
And especially with a meaning conveyed efficiently.
That has not had a good history of success.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 01:24 pm
@spendius,
Now lets get back to reality Spendius! We do not rely on Plainoldme completely for our final analysis, " We all try to analyze your work on face value!

I do find you to be wise when you are not trying so hard!

Keep in mind that others say that I share the same basic concept of understanding as a fool does, so please do not except my opinion as if it is some sort of great wisdom!
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 01:45 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
That has not had a good history of success.


You say that without the slightest knowledge of what it is you speak of.
spendius
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 01:52 pm
@reasoning logic,
Your self-abnegation, rl, is an example to us all.

I can see advantages to you all relying on pom's final analysis.

All wise people are wise in the same way but fools are foolish in a large number of ways.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 02:09 pm
@spendius,
I do not understand why you would prefer to rely on pom's final analysis. You do know as everyone else does, "that she could be wrong as you or me could be?

You are not an absolutist in your way of thinking are you?


spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 02:30 pm
@reasoning logic,
Pretty much--yes. On the things I'm not I don't expend a lot of time except maybe to have some sport with those who are absolutists on them. Like Libya say. An evolutionist waits to see what happens. The jury is still out on money changing across the tables. Is the Kalahari bushman more human than we are?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 02:36 pm
@spendius,
Let me rephrase the questions that I asked {You are not an absolutist in your way of thinking are you?} Your quote: { Pretty much--yes. }


Is this your answer to that question and if not what is this answer to?
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 03:07 pm
@spendius,
David wrote:
That has not had a good history of success.

spendius wrote:
You say that without the slightest knowledge of what it is you speak of.
Too frequently, maybe 80% of the time, your posts r incomprehensible.
Figuring them out is like disentangling knots in rope, not always successfully;
not always with confidence in the result.

I don 't know whether to attribute that to how the English speak,
in your area, or to your consumption of beer or ale, or whatever it is.

R u in London ?
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 02:29:23