46
   

Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero

 
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:22 am
@Caroline,
Caroline wrote:

But right next to the site of the WTC.

But that's the rub... how close is "right next to the site of the WTC"? There are those that argue that all of New York is the site of the WTC attack. Those protesting the construction of a mosque in California must feel that all the US is the site of the WTC attack. The site of the WTC is the site of the WTC and one block away is not the site of the WTC attack IMO. The problem is that since there are no rules agreed to, people make them up to suit their purposes. In this case, they say two blocks is too close. If this was a Starbucks, then heck lets put in directly on site. A Wal Mart, too disrespectful of the dead, maybe in Brooklyn but a mom and pop retailer can go right beside it. It's an all purpose excuse to allow you to pursue whatever agenda you have.
0 Replies
 
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:23 am
@DrewDad,
Peace for the majority ffs!
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:25 am
@Caroline,
Really? You compromised?

Then explain this statement from you..
Quote:
But right next to the site of the WTC.


Either you compromised and agreed they could build 2 blocks away or you didn't. You can't have it both ways. If you really compromised then you would let them build it 2 blocks away and no longer have an argument. But the fact that you are still arguing shows you weren't really compromising. You have gone back on your compromise.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:26 am
@Caroline,
Well.... the majority could have peace if they killed the minority..

But that isn't quite what you want, or is it?
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:27 am
@parados,
Of course it isn't how did you arrive at that assumption, hmmmm?
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:28 am
@parados,
Sorry but your post is spinning me out, I'm very tired and might have to quit very soon, thanks. Would you mind telling me in English what the hell are you on about?
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:31 am
@Caroline,
Caroline wrote:

Peace for the majority ffs!

How can you have peace without justice?
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:32 am
@DrewDad,
Justice for what ffs?
parados
 
  2  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:35 am
@Caroline,
You said you would compromise and let them build 2 blocks away.

They are going to build 2 blocks away.

Now you are arguing they shouldn't build so close to the WTC site.

Did you agree they could build 2 blocks away or not?
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:36 am
@Caroline,
Caroline wrote:

Of course it isn't how did you arrive at that assumption, hmmmm?

Well, the majority could certainly vote to do that. (And has done so in some countries)


There is nothing preventing them other than a legal system that provides justice.
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:37 am
@parados,
No I'm certain I didn't say that, show me please.
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:37 am
@Caroline,
I don't understand why you said OK in response to my post and then a few post later turned right around and repeated the nonesense about it being insensitive to build a mosque around ground zero. (Or words to that effect)
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:38 am
@Caroline,
Didn't say which?
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:39 am
@parados,
Did I say without the justice system, no I did not, don't assume things about me, that's foolish.
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:42 am
@revelette,
I haven't got time nor energy to trawl back to figure out what you are talking about. I think my argument is clear enough to withstand any misunderstanding so forgive me if I don't spend time trying to sort it out, I don't have that time.
0 Replies
 
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:44 am
@parados,
Work it out for yourself, it's quite simple you click on the addressee of the thread and you will understand.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:45 am
@Caroline,
Caroline wrote:

Justice for what ffs?

If I and two of my friends decide that we should have your car and purse, should that be OK?

I mean, majority rule and all.
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:45 am
Enough fun and games, I have to go. Peace!
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:46 am
@Caroline,
Why, for ****'s sake?
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Aug, 2010 09:48 am
@DrewDad,
Don't be a jerk, for a start the majority in the real sense say it's a crime. You failed to make your point because it is well pointless. Goodbye.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 08:57:10