46
   

Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero

 
 
engineer
 
  4  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 12:21 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:

Sort of like PTSD then? But, we do not discount PTSD as a syndrome that does not need to be addressed, since it is painful for the individual. We do not ask suvivors of concentration camps to vacation on the Rhine and enjoy a nice Oktoberfest. Similarly, I believe, we should not ask New Yorkers to live comfortably with a Ground Zero mega-mosque.

I understand that argument, but I think you are confusing treating the condition with trampling others' rights. We do not ask survivors of concentration camps to vacation on the Rhine and enjoy a nice Oktoberfest, but we do not ban all citizens from vacationing there and cancel all Oktoberfest celebrations either. New Yorkers are welcome not to attend the mosque or even walk by it if it causes them pain, but eliminating all future construction for fear it might cause them stress is an over-reaction. How do you define ground zero? What if all mosques in the US cause them pain? How about all mosques in the world?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 12:27 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:

Quote:
Notice that New Yorkers usually do not stick their nose in the problems of the rest of the country, I believe. Interesting, I think, how many people from other places think New York is their business? Perhaps, M.Y.O.B. is the correct etiquette?


I thought all you folks lived in the United States.
Thomas
 
  7  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 12:50 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
But some of those grieving families and friends were American Muslims.

This point can't be repeated enough. About a percent of American citizens are Muslims. (Nobody knows for sure, but it's a common estimate.) If the concentration of Muslims in New York is average for the country---probably a conservative estimate---about 100,000--200,000 New Yorkers are of Muslim faith. Therefore, the rhetoric game of playing "the feelings of New Yorkers" against "the Muslims and their mosque" is phony. Down at the site of the proposed building, it's New Yorkers on both side of the issue. This conflict is about conservative Christian New Yorkers and conservative Jewish New Yorkers, uniting to dump on Muslim New Yorkers. It's not about New Yorkers vs Muslims.
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 01:02 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

Foofie wrote:

Quote:
Notice that New Yorkers usually do not stick their nose in the problems of the rest of the country, I believe. Interesting, I think, how many people from other places think New York is their business? Perhaps, M.Y.O.B. is the correct etiquette?


I thought all you folks lived in the United States.

Not according to Mama Bear Palin and her "Real America."

A
R
T
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 01:03 pm
@Thomas,
Quote:
This conflict is about conservative Christian New Yorkers and conservative Jewish New Yorkers, uniting to dump on Muslim New Yorkers.


No, conservative Jewish New Yorkers are not really involved as an organized group. The Anti-Defamation League is a Jewish organization that fights bigotry and intolerance, and, ironically, they have come out against the building of the mosque. But that is a private group which hardly speaks for, or represents, all Jews. And they have generated a lot of criticism from Jews, who normally support their work, because they strongly disagree with the ADL's stance on this issue.
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 01:09 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Quote:
This conflict is about conservative Christian New Yorkers and conservative Jewish New Yorkers, uniting to dump on Muslim New Yorkers.


No, conservative Jewish New Yorkers are not really involved as an organized group....

And ditto on the "no", this time concerning conservative Christian New Yorkers - Pat Robertson represents those to an even smaller extent than ADL can be said to represent conservative Jews. In New York certainly, possibly around the country as well.
0 Replies
 
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 01:15 pm
Can we jump to the point where no religious group is assumed to be pointing fingers? Can we just jump to blaming the atheists already?

A
R
T
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 01:57 pm
@failures art,
Governor Patterson just proposed a reasonable compromise. The state is willing to help the Cordoba group find a different site for the proposed cultural center/mosque which is further from the WTC location. That should satisy all parties, except those who plain do not want Muslims building any more mosques anywhere.
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 02:12 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Governor Patterson just proposed a reasonable compromise. The state is willing to help the Cordoba group find a different site for the proposed cultural center/mosque which is further from the WTC location. That should satisy all parties, except those who plain do not want Muslims building any more mosques anywhere.


I am not sure how that is reasonable. Will the state also provide funds to help build in this 'alternate site'?

Will the 'alternate site' be in the same general area? After all, the reason for the current site is so that those in the area can easily attend prayer times. Also, what about the other tenants that are no part of the mosque?

It seems the only real compromise and concession will be on the Muslim side.

engineer
 
  2  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 02:22 pm
@Intrepid,
I agree. This "compromise" means that the Muslim center must bow to extremist pressure and move or refuse and be made out to be the bad guy for not taking a "reasonable" solution. It's a lose-lose for them and the governor shouldn't have set it up that way.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 02:24 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:
I just choose to value old-time New Yorkers over this comparatively recent immigrant group.



1870 - not all so recent


http://www.gothamgazette.com/commentary/107.history_arab.shtml

Quote:
When Arabs, many of them Syrian Christians, first came to New York around 1870, they settled on Washington Street, in the shadow of where the World Trade Center would be put up a century later.


Quote:
PRESENT DAY ARABS AND MUSLIMS

Today, Arabs in the city are part of a larger Muslim community from virtually every part of the globe. Muslim New Yorkers come from Bangladesh, India, Afghanistan and Iran, from the Balkans, from West Africa (notably Ghana, Senegal, Niger and Sierra Leone) and even from the Americas, principally Guyana and Trinidad-Tobago.

Of the estimated 600,000 Muslims in New York, about 200,000 are of Arab ancestry, according to Louis Abdulatif Cristillo of the Muslims in New York Project at Columbia University.

Arab Muslims, who have immigrated in greater number since the mid 1960s, were once a nearly invisible minority compared to Christian Arabs. But now the Muslims have become increasingly engaged in the public life of the city. They live beyond the traditional enclaves of lower Manhattan, Brooklyn Heights, and South Brooklyn, venturing out into the other boroughs to live, open businesses and become part of mixed neighborhoods.

There has been a tremendous expansion of mosques since the late 1970's, with close to 130 mosques now in the city.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 02:30 pm
@engineer,
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2009147,00.html

Quote:

The early history of Muslims in the U.S. was a lonely one. While there are isolated reports of "Moorish" sailors and even an Egyptian dwelling in corners of the colonies, the first significant populations were slaves from West Africa. Bilali Mohammed was born in Guinea in roughly 1770 and died in 1857 on a plantation on Sapelo Island in Georgia, leaving behind a 13-sheaf document in Arabic. It's a treatise of religious jurisprudence specific to the society of Muslim West Africa and one of the earliest classic slave narratives. Abdulrahman Ibraheem Ibn Sori, like the literary figure of Oroonoko in Aphra Behn's famous 1688 novel of the same name, was royalty from a Guinean kingdom before being abducted and whisked away to slavery in Mississippi. As word of a lettered, regal "Prince of Slaves" spread across the country, Ibn Sori won allies and friends and was eventually freed in 1828 by an order from President John Quincy Adams. He left the U.S. for the former slave republic of Liberia in Africa but died of fever soon thereafter, never to return to the land of his birth.

Most Muslim African slaves were far less lucky, and memory of their varied cultural heritage dissipated over generations of enslavement. Black Islam would be revived in the first half of the 20th century as a creed of empowerment and redemption. The Nation of Islam, founded in 1933, sought to step away from the indignity of the past with a wholesale rejection of the predominantly white, Christian nation that surrounded them; to this day, the website of the now much diminished group identifies black Americans as descendants of a "Lost Nation of Asia." For prominent activists like Malcolm X, Islam was a badge of otherness, of distinction and pride in the face of old injustices.

On the sidelines of these struggles, other Muslims were more than happy to try to fit in. By the end of the 19th century, immigrants from the Ottoman Empire began settling in pockets across the U.S. Some of the first active Muslim congregations in the country began in towns like Cedar Rapids, Iowa (led by Lebanese), and Biddeford, Maine (led by Albanians). In 1926, Polish-speaking Tatars opened one of the first mosques in Brooklyn. By the latter half of the 20th century, the majority of Muslims moving to the U.S. were from South Asia and Arab states. Today, there are an estimated 7 million Muslims living in the U.S., from myriad communities and all walks of life. To speak of them in generalities would be pointless.



and another source with an even more interesting timeline (I've definitely got some more reading to do)

http://www.islam101.com/history/muslim_us_hist.html
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 02:31 pm
@failures art,
failures art wrote:

Can we jump to the point where no religious group is assumed to be pointing fingers? Can we just jump to blaming the atheists already?

A
R
T


Actually, you bring up a good point, Art.

In this situation, I don't see that atheists are the ones jumping on the bandwagon to stop the mosque. On the contrary, I have seen the opposite. Based on this thread.

I am seeing tolerance on this thread. For the most part.

I am not impressed that many Christians, some jews and I am not sure what other people of faith are the ones who seem to be showing intolerance. At least Pat Robertson for sure.

This shows that there can be tolerance of religion. Any religion.

That is a good thing.
dyslexia
 
  2  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 03:09 pm
@Intrepid,
I am an atheist but I'm rarely accused of tolerance. cranky yes, tolerance no.
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 03:29 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

I agree. This "compromise" means that the Muslim center must bow to extremist pressure and move or refuse and be made out to be the bad guy for not taking a "reasonable" solution. It's a lose-lose for them and the governor shouldn't have set it up that way.
You don't know our governor - Paterson, one "t" - do you?

He's the most godawful incompetent, picked by the elected governor for precisely that reason (analogous to Franklin Roosevelt picking least-likely-to-be-competition Harry Truman as his VP) and an accidental successor to the post when the elected guy was identified as "client #9" in some prostitution ring and had to go. You should worry if he supported the mosque project as is; his proposed compromise is laughable, not to mention impractical since our state is almost as broke as California and Paterson has no business showing largesse with taxpayers' monies.
0 Replies
 
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 04:09 pm
@Intrepid,
Good points, all.

I can't remember how many years it has been, but I still remember the survey that found that atheists were the least trusted minority in the USA.

I guess this nontroversy might have actually tested American tolerance had it been the construction of large center for Atheism instead of a mosque.

(perhaps)

A
R
T
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 04:24 pm
@failures art,
Picture of protesters picketing Mayor Bloomberg's townhouse - they're not Moslems, Jews, Christians, any other religion, or atheists >
http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/08/10/alg_bloomberg_protestors.jpg
> their issue is far, far more important than that:

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/08/10/2010-08-10_protesters_take_aim_at_mike.html?r=news&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nydnrss%2Fnews+%28News%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 05:47 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Quote:
Like any loyal dog (i.e., Rin Tin Tin, Lassie) I do not bite the hand that feeds me and my family since the 1880's.


So you admit that you care not at all for the rule of law, for justice, for what's right. All you care about is filling your own tummy and you're more than willing to do whatever is necessary to provide cover for those who would commit evil, as long as you are allowed to escape that evil.




You seem to be making extrapolations that result in false accusations. I admit nothing to you. You are haranguing me at this point. Take your political views, and sell them to someone else.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 05:50 pm
@failures art,
failures art, What do you expect from a survey when over 90% of the people believe in one religion or another. Can we call that bias? LOL
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2010 05:52 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:


...So, while I respect your emotional antipathy to the building of this mosque, I feel that it is not enough of a substantive objection to actually block construction of that mosque.


Plus, if the mosque and its mosquevites truly want to build bridges of peace, the first step might be to place this mosque somewhere other than so close to Ground Zero, where just in June more remains of victims have been found.

 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 01:25:21