Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero

@cicerone imposter,

Where do those papers that u posted
say that u had anything to do with NUKES ?

Where does it say that u served
in the Strategic Air Command ??

I see some mention of "Lieutenant General".
Do u claim to be a lieutenant general ?

By what reasoning do u consider those papers to be "proof" as u claim ?

Please explain ???

David

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

If you had put 2 plus 2 together, you would have seen it. But, you're too stupid to observe what's in front of you. Can't help stupid people; it's in your genes.

I was a member of the 37th ADS @ Walker AFB, a SAC base with bombers. Guess what those bombers carried? Any dope would be able to figure that one out - except for stupid people like you.

You never learned to connect the dots - that's right in front of your nose. Stupid.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

If you had put 2 plus 2 together, you would have seen it. But, you're too stupid to observe what's in front of you. Can't help stupid people; it's in your genes.

I was a member of the 37th ADS @ Walker AFB, a SAC base with bombers. Guess what those bombers carried? Any dope would be able to figure that one out - except for stupid people like you.

You never learned to connect the dots - that's right in front of your nose. Stupid.

This issue is not the degree of my intelligence.
The question is WHERE in those papers
that u posted it says that YOU were anything.

U posted them. Please explain them.

David

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

When C.I. gets frustrated, he attacks what he presumes to be lack of intelligence.

3 Replies

@Intrepid,

Intrepid wrote:

When C.I. gets frustrated, he attacks what he presumes to be lack of intelligence.

Yes, I know, but we can require him to be honest.
If he posts that those exhibits "prove"
what he claims, then we can ask him
to show us HOW this is set forth in his alleged "proof".

I believe that his exhibit does NOT
support his alleged conclusions and I want him
to admit that it does NOT; either that,
or explain how it does.

His conclusions, from that alleged "evidence" are non sequiturs.
He tried to brush me off simply with a personal insult.
That will not work.
I can be (and I have been) very persistent.

We 'll see.

(Let me be clear that I am questioning
only the logic of his posted "evidence";
I am not now addressing whether
he actually handled nukes or not.)

David

0 Replies

@Intrepid,

CI have problems such as claiming that the former USSR and the US run hundreds upon hundreds of nuclear tests in order to get the information to design such weapons but none of those tests was needed as the basic physics is well understood to the point any country can whip up a state of the art nuclear weapon.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

My New Mexico driver's license shows I was a member of the 37th ADS. I also have shown what the 37th ADS did at Walker AFB.

Elementary to the extreme, but dummies like you can't see it.

1 Reply

@Intrepid,

You lack intelligence by not being able to comprehend what I've written - in very simple English.

1 Reply

@BillRM,

BillRM wrote:

Quote:

CI have problems such as claiming that the former USSR and the US run hundreds upon hundreds of nuclear tests in order to get the information to design such weapons but none of those tests was needed as the basic physics is well understood to the point any country can whip up a state of the art nuclear weapon.

Your a ******* liar! Show me where I've made such a statement?

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

My New Mexico driver's license shows I was a member of the 37th ADS.
I also have shown what the 37th ADS did at Walker AFB.

Let 's examine one element of your presentation at a time,
beginning with the top image: what IS that image ?

I see that it mentions "lieutenant general".
Do u allege that you are a lieutenant general ?

cicerone imposter wrote:

Elementary to the extreme, but dummies like you can't see it.

What is the reason that u keep being so REDUNDANT on this off-topic point??????
We already know your opinion on the point of I.Q.

Restating your opinion so many times
will not have any effect.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Where did you read "Lt General?" Where did I ever claim to be a Lt General? Can you read English?
Walker AFB was a SAC base.

Yes, the papers I presented proves that 1) I was in the 37th ADS, and 2) I was based at Walker AFB in New Mexico - a SAC base.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

Your a ******* liar! Show me where I've made such a statement?

LOL happy holiday and sure you did no secret/non-public domain knowledge needed to produced advance/useful nuclear weapons was your stand so no need to worry about traitors therefore turning over such information.

Please take note I never stated that first or even second generations weapons could not be created but not weapons of great usefulness without a large testing program or getting your hands on the engineering information already produced by someone else past testing program that is not repeat not in the public domain.

A very large and very massive low yield weapon you could produce without a testing program knowledge is not all that useful to say then least in the modern world.

In a military sense, at least you would likely be far better off spending your resources on large air/fuel non-nuclear weapons if your goal is to take out some of your enemies cities centers about the only task a first/second generation bomb is good for.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

David wrote:

Quote:

Let 's examine one element of your presentation at a time,
beginning with the top image: what IS that image ?

That is the paperwork that shows I had a Top Secret clearance in the USAF.

David wrote:

Quote:

I see that it mentions "lieutenant general".
Do u allege that you are a lieutenant general ?

I don't need to allege anything; it's self-explanatory if you know how to read forms.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

David wrote:
Quote:
Let 's examine one element of your presentation at a time,
beginning with the top image: what IS that image ?

That is the paperwork that shows I had a Top Secret clearance in the USAF.

David wrote:

Quote:
I see that it mentions "lieutenant general".
Do u allege that you are a lieutenant general ?

I don't need to allege anything; it's self-explanatory if you know how to read forms.

I did not see that there is another picture
higher on the page than the one that I asked about.
Hence, that one that I asked about is not the top image; I had not seen the other one.

I was asking about the set of images, in Post: # 4,455,200.
Do u claim to be a "lieutenant general" ?
What is the reason that u posted that picture ?

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

If you had even bothered to look at the second image, it shows my rank as A/3rd class; a recruit who passed basic training - in your jargon.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

What is the top image in Post: # 4,455,200 ?

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

You lack intelligence by not being able to comprehend what I've written - in very simple English.

What the hell are you talking about? I wasn't even in conversation with you. Moron.

1 Reply

@Intrepid,

Hey, Intrepid the moron; when you post on a2k, you're communicating with "everybody" on the thread. Moron.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

What is the top image in your Post: # 4,455,200 ?

0 Replies

Has the impostor fled the scene,
to conceal his poor "evidence" ??

Is he getting away ?

1 Reply

Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know