46
   

Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2010 05:09 pm
@BillRM,
BilRM, Again, you show your ignorance of history.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2010 09:31 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
BilRM, Again, you show your ignorance of history


How many hundreds or thousands of years are you going to need to go back to find a catholic church acting in the manner of a nowaday mosque in regard to terrorism?

We all are now waiting for whatever you can come up with even if whatever it is would have no connection to the existing situation.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2010 09:35 pm
@BillRM,
You don't have to go back thousands of years. The vatican hid child molestation and rapes. What else are they hiding?
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:25 am
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
You don't have to go back thousands of years. The vatican hid child molestation and rapes. What else are they hiding?


That all you can come up with pedophilias priests and a cover up of them?

Here I was hoping you could come up with something a little better such as a priest or two using their churches to help rebels in some South American country in the 1960s at least.

Yes, child molesting is the same thing as plots to kill thousands of people, and is indeed the same as placing a bomb into a world trade center tower with the hope at the time of killing 50,000 people if memory serve me correctly or trying to blow up/flood subways tunnels with thousands of people in them or………all in the name of their god.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:30 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
If you ask Americans, "can we bomb civilians in order to protect America from its enemies" you'll probably get a pretty large number saying "yes."


Oh? Can you randomly blow up children and women with no military reason for doing so you would think that Americans would say go for it?

I think that if you worded a poll the way I said, then yes, lots and lots of people would say "yes."

The poll didn't say, "for no military reason." The poll said, "in order to protect [it] from its enemies."

It's a crock.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 07:13 am
@DrewDad,
Targeting and attacking civilians is one thing going after a clearly military target where civilians are near enough that some will be harm or kill is another thing.

Can you harm civilians to take out a military target is not the same as bombing civilians to bomb civilians.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 10:10 am
@BillRM,
YOu say "that's all?" You are sick in the head; you just don't know it. It ruined many children's lives.

BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 01:02 pm
@cicerone imposter,
And ruining lives by sexually assaulting the young is connected in what manner to planting a bomb with the hope of taking down two buildings in such a manner as to kill fifty thousands people?

0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 01:21 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Targeting and attacking civilians is one thing going after a clearly military target where civilians are near enough that some will be harm or kill is another thing.

Can you harm civilians to take out a military target is not the same as bombing civilians to bomb civilians.

Tell that to the (deceased) citizens of Dresden....

You're operating under assumptions that aren't warranted.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 01:33 pm
@DrewDad,
BillRM has myopia; he doesn't understand all the atrocities committed by the US against other countries, and the killing of innocent men, women and children. The Vietnamese still suffer from our war in their country from the after-effects of agent orange. They are born with deformities.

BillRM doesn't understand logistics; the US represents only 5 percent of the world population, and we've done more harm to innocent folks in other countries than the minority of Muslims who commit atrocities.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 01:34 pm
@DrewDad,
Let see if memory serve me correctly Dresden was a major railroad hub providing the means to keep the German army fighting.

An army even in it last breaths that was able to cost the Russians 81 thousands dead and a few hundreds thousands wounded in the taking of Berlin.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 01:38 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
BillRM doesn't understand logistics; the US represents only 5 percent of the world population, and we've done more harm to innocent folks in other countries than the minority of Muslims who commit atrocities.


So once more is it or is it not your position that we should therefore allow the Muslims to kill anyone they feel like killing to atone for our sins?

Otherwise what connection is there in our taking needed steps to protect ourselves and any of your claimed past sins of ours?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 02:34 pm
@BillRM,
It's not a matter of "allowing Muslims to kill anyone they feel like killing." FYI, they can't. There are laws against killing in this country, and it doesn't matter who does the killing. Many white folks kill in this country; that's a fact.

Get your head out of your arse; it might shed some light on the realities of terrorism in this world.

The US has killed more innocent men, women and children than the Muslims have. US population 308 million. Muslim population 1.4 billion. Do you understand logistics?
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 04:13 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
FYI, they can't. There are laws against killing in this country, and it doesn't matter who does the killing. Many white folks kill in this country; that's a fact.


Are you on drugs?

Let see Muslin terrorists cannot kill because of our laws?

White folk where did that come from?

White folks as in US citizens of all others skin colors/races are apart from the evil white folks who are the international killers and the evil ones?

Shaking my head over this posting of your...............
DrewDad
 
  2  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 04:55 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Let see if memory serve me correctly Dresden was a major railroad hub providing the means to keep the German army fighting.

But firebombing the town and killing the entire population was acceptable? When conventional bombs would have destroyed the rail yard?

Careful, bub, your hypocrisy is showing.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:01 pm
@BillRM,
You don't understand anything, do you? There are crimes against murder. Just because an individual commits a crime of murder, whether perpetrated by a Muslim, black, yellow, brown, or white, it's punishable by the laws of this country.

Muslim terrorists like all killers (of any religion, race, or culture) still kill; it's not because of our laws.

You're missing an important part of your brain that teaches rational thinking. Your's is engraved with "Muslim," when it should include everybody. Anybody that kills is a terrorist to the victim.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:19 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Once more there is currently no other major religion group in the world who a fairly large percent of it total membership support in any degree at all mass murder in the name of their religion.

The numbers by country of the percent of Muslims who support mass murder in the name of their god have already been given on this thread.

If memory serves me correctly, it ranges from a few percents to 40 percents of the total population of a given Muslims control country.

As Muslims is without question currently a unique religion group in that regard it is only logic and common sense to treat any religious center of their as more of a risk to the public safety then any other group similar religious centers.

Their is also the little tiny fact that mosques had been used to plot and carry out attempted mass murders in the New York City area only add to the concerns.

Yes I guess we are just suppose to pretend that such religious centers are just the same as a Jewish temple or a Catholic church no matter how many attacks come out of such centers and no matter how many people are kill as a result.




0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:28 pm
@BillRM,
Those Muslin terrorists are some scary people are they not?

The only thing I can say is that I am glad that they are not able to murder as many people as our own sick society can murder.
If I am not mistaken we have more murders in our own country in one year caused by our own people than what we have had caused by terrorists in the past ten years.

Our own peoples sickness makes the terrorists seem less violent when you think about it from a different point of view.

Maybe we should call our own people terrorists sense they are more productive at killing our own people.

BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:52 pm
@reasoning logic,
Once more are we ban from taking logical steps to protect ourselves from Muslim terrorists because of claims misdeeds of our society or it members?

Your reasoning seem to lack logic MR. Reasoning Logic!
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:09 pm
@BillRM,
What make you think that we are ban from taking logical steps to protect ourselves from Muslim terrorists because of claims misdeeds of our society or it members?


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 06:28:31