@hawkeye10,
Hawkeye, the reason you can post, "facts not in evidence" is because
you have no facts and you disregard the verifiable facts I have posted.
The facts "are in evidence" regarding the blatantly untrue things you posted about Iman Rauf. Everyone here can read what you said about him in your post--he's a "loner", no record of accomplishment, or experience handling a project, except "being a slum lord..in New Jersey". You posted those things, you can't deny that. You also can't back those statements up.
I gave you accurate information about Iman Rauf, and about his past experiences handling multi-million dollar Muslim enterprises in NYC, his service as a Middle East emissary on religious affairs with the U. S. State Department under both Bush and Obama, and your reply, to that is, "facts not in evidence"? You are able to read, aren't you? I gave you the "facts". Rauf, in fact, just returned from his State Department sponsored trip to the Middle East.
One fact is abundantly in evidence--you don't know what you are talking about--you are woefully misinformed and uninformed. That's clear to anyone who reads your posts. And you can't deal with it when someone challenges you to back up your statements and assertions with factual sources.
"Facts not in evidence" sums up the depth of your thinking on this issue.