@hingehead,
hingehead wrote:
It's still a stupid semantic dance frank. You argument against someone else's argument is they can't know God doesn't exist.
What do suggest their next course of action should be to prove or disprove their argument given your objection?
Really.
If anyone is doing a dance here, Hingehead...it is you. And for good reason, because you are completely in the wrong on this item.
You originally wrote:
Quote:I haven't posted this anywhere near as often as you post your 'prove there is no possibility of god' notion.
I HAVE NEVER, EVER POSTED ANYTHING THAT DEMANDED PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD OR THE NON-EXISTENCE OF GODS.
I have on many occasions stated that I think any such demand would be absurd, because it simply does not seem possible to accomplish either. It would be grandstanding...and only grandstanding.
So although you have suggested that I have posted such stuff often...I am saying that I have NEVER done it.
Yet instead of manning up and acknowledging that you are dead wrong on this...you are continuing to insist that you are correct...when you are blatantly wrong.
Dance all you want, Hingehead. It is fun to watch you dancing.
But make no mistake about it...I am not the one dancing.
As for "What do suggest their next course of action should be to prove or disprove their argument given your objection? Really."
I have already answered this. Anyone asserting "there is no god"...SHOULD STOP MAKING THAT ASSERTION.
I am not asking them to prove it...because it cannot be proven. NOBODY can prove there is no god. (If there is a GOD...it is at least possible to prove there is a GOD, but there is absolutely no way anyone can ever prove there is no GOD.)
So I would never ask for it.
I never have.
I never will
Your assertion that I have done it many times is
ABSURD.
Try to work up the integrity to finally acknowledge that.