31
   

John Allen Muhammed Executed in VA at 9:22 pm

 
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 05:26 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

I'm surprised that the execution took place so quickly. Very often, prisoners condemned to execution live on for many, many years while appeals wend their way through the courts. An argument against capital punishment which i have heard advanced by opponents to the practice is that, with the cost of lengthy appeals and special, separate incarceration, it is in fact cheaper to warehouse the killer for the rest of his or her life rather than to execute them, and bear such burdens as that. I have not read the entire thread, so i don't know if the question of why he was so speedily executed has been addressed.

I object to execution because i know of no plausible evidence that it deters others from killing, and by the execution, the state relinquishes any claim to moral superiority in the matter. I continue to suspect that this is usually a case of what Nietzsche describes in Beyond Good and Evil when he lists all the putative purposes of penal servitude and execution, and then dismisses them, claiming that the ultimate purpose is revenge, and the gratification of the desire for vengeance by society. I may have stated that imprecisely--it's been by now almost 40 years since i've read that book. I do think, though, that for many of those who support capital punishment, their protestations notwithstanding, the object is vengeance.


Were it not for the vengeance motive, I believe the death penalty would by now be a relic of the past.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:23 am
@edgarblythe,
Agreed.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:32 am
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
Were it not for the vengeance motive, I believe the death penalty would by now be a relic of the past.


Obviously, and we show the same streak of out of tune vengeance when a major global recession hits and the rest of the world makes a major effort to preserve jobs and we do almost nothing, and when the rest of the world considers it important to get everybody health care and we are fine leaving a major fraction of our people to beg for charity care.

We tell each other that we have always been this cut-throat, that it is part of what makes us special in a good way. We have not, and it does not.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:38 am
@edgarblythe,
I can, as a general rule , agree that cap punishment shouldnt be exacted. However, in the cases where the crime is particulrly heinous, evil, and premeditated,(like Malvo and Muhammed), I havent seen any argument against eacting the ultimate punishment.


1I personally want a guarantee that the life that performed these evil deeds isnt able to perform them again (even in a prison surrounds where they could, like Kahlid Sheik Muhammed, communicate orders to their accolytes outside to commit another 9/11)

2In these cases, what is the error in thinking that vengeance is NOT a societal motive? WOuld a mass criminal like Hitler been given a life without parole option).

3In the US, cap punishment increased in the 1990's to about 7 to 10 a year. (THis indicates to me that a swift exsecution of sentence was in the mix) and , as a result, from FBI statistics, murders decreased from a high of 10. in the 80's to a low of 5.8 in 2000. Was there a relationship?

4That argument that Life without parole or that extended appeals housing actually costs less doesnt hold wawa. Life without parole (again according to FBI) costs on average ,3.7 million while execution within a 10 year "reasonable appeal" window costs us 1.2 million.

5 Proven beyond any reasonable doubt(--this falls back on our legal system to "get it right"). capital punishment IS a deterrnet for the executed criminal. THat person will NEVER commit another evil and heinous crime.

SOcieties cannot, in an oversensitive sense of justice, ignore the effects that such crimes have on the lives of the victims families. In an effort to guarantee rights of the accused, we often seem to totally relegate the victims families , to a third class status.

Mame
 
  4  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:50 am
Perhaps this is just semantics, but to me a deterrent is a warning to others, not the offender.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:51 am
@farmerman,
I am at work and cannot devote full attention to this right now.
The notion that a convicted person has been proven beyond a doubt to be guilty is all too often simply not so. In the case that sparked this debate, there is no doubt in my mind. But that doesn't matter. Certainly the man was offal, alive or dead. But the broad stretch of justice does not to my mind allow for death for any, so long as mistakes are made, which is perpetual.

Vengeance certainly makes many glad, when when carried out. Which is why hangings were so popular. I would think we ought to not be in the killing business.

Life without parole is a great strategy. When such persons commit further crimes while in prison, it is usually human error that allows it to happen, I would imagine.

I don't consider money to be a consideration, since we spend countless fortunes of the justice system anyway.

I will be back to think it over more when I get home.
Mame
 
  3  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:59 am
@edgarblythe,
Why should they be able to transgress the rules then have the luxury of being provided for at our expense? No tv, free university, games, etc. I don't care if they get upset about it and riot. Go ahead. Then live in that pigsty for a while. I don't care if they kill each other, either. People like Jeffrey Dahmer, Charles Manson, Clifford Olson, Muhammed What'shisname are creepy, sick and twisted.

I'm not advocating the death penalty, but life without parole and hard labour sounds really good to me. Or send them to an island in the middle of nowhere with no food or supplies.

And really, what's wrong with vengeance anyway?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  0  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 07:30 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

4That argument that Life without parole or that extended appeals housing actually costs less doesnt hold wawa.


the numbers don't bear out this point

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty

Quote:
North Carolina Spends More per Execution than on a Non-death Penalty Murder Case
The most comprehensive death penalty study in the country found that the death penalty costs North Carolina $2.16 million more per execution than the a non-death penalty murder case with a sentence of life imprisonment (. On a national basis, these figures translate to an extra cost of over $1 billion spent since 1976 on the death penalty. ("The Costs of Processing Murder Cases in North Carolina" Duke University, May 1993)


Quote:
Florida Spends Millions Extra per Year on Death Penalty
Florida would save $51 million each year by punishing all first-degree murderers with life in prison without parole, according to estimates by the Palm Beach Post. Based on the 44 executions Florida has carried out since 1976, that amounts to an approximate cost of $24 million for each execution. This finding takes into account the relatively few inmates who are actually executed, as well as the time and effort expended on capital defendants who are tried but convicted of a lesser murder charge, and those whose death sentences are overturned on appeal. ("The High Price of Killing Killers," Palm Beach Post, January 4, 2000)


Florida Spent Average of $3.2 Million per Execution from 1973 to 1988
During that time period, Florida spent an estimated $57 million on the death penalty to achieve 18 executions. ("Bottom Line: Life in Prison One-Sixth as Expensive," Miami Herald, July 10, 1988)


big chunky pdf http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/CostsRptFinal.pdf

(short yahoo piece on the study in the pdf http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091020/ts_alt_afp/usexecutionjustice )

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/us/25death.html

~~~

of general interest re this topic

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/welcome.html

0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 07:53 am
@joefromchicago,
On page 4 of this thread, OCCOM BILL wrote:
In other news, while I still feel as strongly as ever that rapists, child molesters and other repeat violent offenders should be killed along with murderers, in considerably larger numbers... recent experience with courts and juries has convinced me that humans can't be trusted with the responsibility of making this decision... so I am forced to retract my support for the death penalty in most cases... until such time the ultimate decision is mine to make.

LINK

Then, addressing O'Bill yesterday, and offering interesting insight into his own thinking processes, joefromchicago wrote:
You can't tell the difference between the names of people on a list and the people themselves? I see. Now I'm beginning to gain an insight into your thinking processes. No wonder you support capital punishment.
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 07:54 am
@Mame,
Quote:
Perhaps this is just semantics, but to me a deterrent is a warning to others, not the offender.


I agree . . . i found it rather quixotic, to be charitable, to speak of deterrence in reference to the victim of an execution, but i didn't consider it worth my while to argue the point . . .
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 08:13 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:


Were it not for the vengeance motive,

I believe the death penalty would by now be a relic of the past.
THAT is a very importatnt MOTIVE.
THAT is the reason that I pay my taxes: to be avenged, if it comes to that.

If government defaults on the social contract
to avenge victims of violence, then morally, the right to get even reverts.





David
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 09:16 am
@Ticomaya,
If you had been paying attention, Tico, you would have noticed that O'BILL didn't renounce his support for capital punishment, he just stated that he couldn't support capital punishment as it is currently practiced. He still wants to kill convicted murderers (and rapists and child molesters), just in a more fair and efficient manner.

Try to keep up.
Endymion
 
  3  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 09:34 am
The main reason I'm against the death penalty, is that it's pre meditated murder and where i come from, the law applies to everyone, equally.

There are other reasons, too. For example, putting a man to death for going on a killing spree does not serve the public well. It won't stop the next shooting - or the next. It slams a lid on one problem and waits for another.

If society really wants to protect its citizens, surely it would be better to learn more about WHY some people turn murderous?

And i would bet that the threat of a life spent under psychiatric study would be more of a deterrent than the highly charged drama of being murdered by the state. I don't doubt for a moment that when the killer took down his first victim, he was committing suicide. Of course he was, he's dead isn't he?
There for, it almost feels like authority is playing HIS game by finding it within themselves to commit pre meditated murder in line with the killer's vision of the world.

And what about the bereaved? For some, who wait to see the murderer of their loved one put to death, that wait is years- even decades, as lawyers fight in court to keep their client alive.
This amounts to stealing their lives from them, as they follow the course of events, the efforts of the killer to save his own neck - they are forced into his world. They can not move on from their loss, when really, there needs to be early closure for them, above all others.

And when the killer is gone, what then, for them? His murder may make some feel better for a while - but really, what does it do for them physiologically, in the long term? The murder of another human being, i mean?


Also, i don't think its a good idea to give authority the power to arrange our deaths and execute us. Where there is power there is corruption - and it doesn't get much more powerful than playing God - just ask the next shooter who comes along.
I think a government's motives for keeping the death penalty, should be questioned seriously.

Of course in the end, for many people, it comes down to vengeance.
But violent revenge - especially when it is the equivalent of the crime committed, proves itself to be worthless. Nothing more than fearful outrage, uncontrolled. What it really does is take away the problem. What it doesn't do is anything to stop the next problem arising.

The killer's victim is dead and gone - so who is this revenge for?
Or is 'revenge' simply an excuse for not having to look too deeply into the social aspects of these killings? Or too closely at insanity.

The killer owes something to the living. Being forced to live a basic life, in a secure psychiatric hospital, involved in sociological and psychiatric studies of his mentality, with the goal of pre-empting such carnage in the future - forcing a killer to help save lives, in fact - surely that would be real vengeance.
And for the bereaved, it would at least leave them with some small hope for the future. Knowing that lives may well be saved.

I don't feel this way because i give a **** about someone who would shoot innocent people in the street. I feel this way because i honestly believe that murder is a crime against humanity, even against ourselves if we do the murdering, because it de-humanises on both sides of the action. And it does not promote a wiser society or a safer one. It only promotes violence - and in so doing REWARDS the killer and anyone else who promotes and instigates violence on others.

An eye for an eye? How can that help change anything?
I don't believe that is in the best interests of any community. All it really amounts to, is giving in to the violence and joining in with it.


0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  3  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 11:05 am
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:
If you had been paying attention, Tico, you would have noticed that O'BILL didn't renounce his support for capital punishment, he just stated that he couldn't support capital punishment as it is currently practiced. He still wants to kill convicted murderers (and rapists and child molesters), just in a more fair and efficient manner.

Try to keep up.

I've paid attention. Evidently the words "I am forced to retract my support for the death penalty in most cases" carry a different meaning for you.

He stated he does not presently support capital punishment -- "as it's currently practiced," using your words. So, until such time as there is a change in the administration of this particular justice -- and that time has not yet come -- HE DOES NOT SUPPORT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Your statement that he supports capital punishment was incorrect.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 12:15 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Jesus, but you're a simpleton, OmSig. Come clean why don't you and admit that it's all been a lie. There is no way an idiot like you could ever have gotten into university.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 12:15 pm

The 8th Amendment to the contrary notwithstanding,
murderers shoud be killed in the same way that thay executed their murders.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 12:25 pm
@Ticomaya,
Well, that's rather like saying that the pedophile who wants to have sex with underage girls isn't really a pedophile at all because he doesn't want to have sex with this underage girl. O'BILL still wants to kill convicted murderers, just not under this system. In general, though, he still supports capital punishment, he just doesn't want it bothering his conscience too much. If you want to delude yourself into thinking that means he doesn't support capital punishment, then don't let me stop you.

In any event, O'BILL said that he retracted his support for the death penalty "in most cases." So it's clear, even with the quote that you rely upon, that he supports capital punishment in at least some cases.

But rather than debate with me, why don't you ask him yourself? It's not like you have O'BILL on ignore or anything, do you?
Ticomaya
 
  5  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 01:09 pm
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:
But rather than debate with me, why don't you ask him yourself? It's not like you have O'BILL on ignore or anything, do you?

I'm not debating you, I'm pointing out your error. You ask him if you feel the need to try and seek vindication.
joefromchicago
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 03:13 pm
@Ticomaya,
There's no error to point out, unless you want to point at your own posts.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 04:57 pm
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:
We've been here too many times, Joe. This is where I list examples of murderers sentenced to life who've killed again...

You've posted lists before, but not of murderers sentenced to life without parole who have killed anyone outside the prison walls. And that's the only list that has any kind of relevance where the options being discussed are capital punishment and life without parole.
I see you're still ducking this question, Joe. Why would a list of those murdered outside of prison be relevant, but a list of those murdered inside the prison would not?

Your silly personal attacks don't hide the fact that you're ducking this question at all.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 01:32:45