Quote:Do you really think a gun would have helped?
I am confident that it woud have.
Even just the look on the human 's face while aiming it
woud probably startle him; (that works with humans too; I have kinda done that, sort of).
Thay know counteraggression when thay see it.
Quote: For an animal that size you would kill it on the first shot,
something unlikely even if you're an expert marksman.
Respectfully, I must disagree.
In my opinion, even putting a round into the dirt in front of him,
the report and the shock of getting dirt hitting him from below
woud startle him and activate his flight reaction
which is prominent concerning humans (those who are not running away) anyway.
For a hiker going into the woods, I 'd recommend a .44 magnum revolver
unless he or she wishes to carry a shoulder weapon,
because we hear of this sort of thing with cougars, bears, wolves,
but if confronted with this situation, I 'm pretty sure that even
slightly clipping him on his nose or jaw with a tiny little .22 round woud
very likely cause him to flee. Unless he is rabid, I don t think killing him woud be necessary,
because it is
in their NATURE to run away in the face of human aggression.
To state the obvious:
if u actually
DO put a .44 round into a coyote, that 's the end of that.
Regardless of hitting any vital organ,
there 'd be a tremendous catastrophic
SHOCK that woud end his attack.
The others woud take the hint.
As to the need of being "an expert marksman"
remember that the coyote 's teeth are completely harmless
unless he closes the distance between him and u to zero feet & zero inches.
In other words: it shoud not be a difficult shot.
Taylor perished from bite wounds; she coud have put the muzzle
in his ear b4 she popped him.
Even a knife woud have helped. Defensive attitude, morale -- counts for a lot.
Quote:
Otherwise you're just going to piss it off even further.
See above.
That might count with bears, not coyotes.
David