0
   

The Jews.

 
 
Dizzy Delicious
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 04:24 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
I'm not so sure Israel is "useful" by any stretch of the imagination. We give them a largess of over three billion dollars every year, and in return we share the blame for all the problems in Israel.


You might be sharing the "blame" , but I for one will not.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 04:39 pm
DD, WELCOME to A2K. "We" share the problems, because Arabs-Muslims see the US as the trouble-maker and supporter of Israel in the Middle East. We cannot divorce ourselves from the reactions of others they see as the "enemy."

If you think the US and Israel has "smart" bombs, fundamentalist Muslims do not care who they target.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 05:01 pm
Dizzy Delicious- I respectfully urge you to review any of Mr. Imposter's past output on these threads. He is a reflexive "Bush-Hater". I have searched assiduoulsy for a post he may have written criticizing Preident Bush's attire. I have found none so far and I am amazed since Mr. Imposter had criticized everything else that the President has done in very vigorous terms.

He is entitled to do so, of course, Dizzty Delicious, but we are not constrained to agree with him especially since so much of the "evidence" he puts forward is either bogus or so highly slanted to the left that it is not possible to have any kind of rational conversation.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 05:05 pm
I think that Mr. Imposter may have a point when he says that he is concerned about the treatment of Palestinians in Israel.

I distinctly remember that some of those people received BONUSES from Saddam himself when they went into Palestinian towns and blew themselves up on buses, in night clubs, and in market places to kill dozens of innocents in the streets.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 05:07 pm
Bernie tries very hard to find fault with everybody on a2k. His efforts to find a post by me to talk about Bush's attire is how desparate he really is.
Bush can go around stark naked for all I care - you know that one about the emperor...

It will not take you long to learn the Bernie has very little respect from the majority of posters on a2k. Only he himself thinks he's great!
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 05:20 pm
Dear Mr.Imposter:Please be advised that not only do I not seek any RESPECT from left wing slugs who inhabit A2K but I would feel positively ineradically tarnished if even the shadow of one of the politically untouchable radical left wing liberals were to fall across my path. I write for myself and for anyone who may agree> If Mr. Dizzy Delicious wishes to ally himself with your opinions, he may. If he does not, he wont.

I am amused that so many posters would, if you are correct, Mr. Imposter, not write on these threads unless they recieved the "respect" of left wing extremists. I am not aware that you are congnizant of the fact that anyone with any real "self-respect" would never cow tow to radical left wingers. Only people whose puerile need to be "liked" would agree with a world view that is destructive of our nation.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 05:25 pm
Bernie, That you cowtow to moron Bush is more telling than anything you can say. Tell us one thing moron Bush has done right? Iraq? New Orleans? Social Security? Federal deficit? The drug plan for seniors? His attempts to involve the supreme court in the Teri Schiavo case? His many lies? The worst job creation since Hoover?
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 08:43 pm
You ask questions? I do too. What is the Unemployment Rate at present?


What is the GDP for the United States at this time?

What was the deficit predicted to be for the past fiscal year when the Democrats were moaning? What is the yearly deficit going to be for this year? What is the difference between the predictions of last year and this year?

Who was nominated to the USSC since 2000? By whom. Why is that so important?

But, most important of all, Who won the elections of 2000, 2002 and 2004?


I do have a piece of good news for you, Mr. Imposter. George W. Bush will not win his next election for President!!!
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 08:49 pm
Schiavo Case?

I am very much afraid you don't know what you are talking about, Mr. Imposter. You do know that we have three branches of government, don't you? Note below:




Emergency vote puts Schiavo case in federal court
President signs bill transferring jurisdiction from state judge
Monday, March 21, 2005 Posted: 2:24 PM EST (1924 GMT)


President Bush returns to the White House to sign the legislation.















WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The fight over whether Terri Schiavo's feeding tube should be restored moved to federal court Monday after Congress passed emergency legislation in the severely brain-damaged woman's case.

President Bush signed the bill into law early Monday, shortly after it cleared the House of Representatives by a 203-58 vote. The Senate passed the legislation by voice vote Sunday.

The House and Senate overwhemingly voted for the bill. THEY ARE THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PEOPLE. They were the ones who sent the bill to the President's desk for his signature.

If you don't know that, Mr. Imposter, you should read up on how the goverment works. NOTHING could have been done without the assent of the REPRESENATIVES OF THE PEOPLE!!
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 08:54 pm
Iraq? I hope that I don't have to post( again) the fact that the House and the Senate gave President Bush the authority to use the military as he saw fit. If the people of the United States do not think that President Bush did the right thing, they had the choice of voting against him in 2004. They did not do so, He was re-elected.

Now, of course, the people do not have to vote for him the next time he runs for President!!!!
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 08:56 pm
I am very much afraid, Mr. Imposter that you know little or nothing about the federal deficit and the GDP and the relation between the two. May I respectfully suggest that you stick to topics with which you can comment coherently!!!
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 10:26 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
At least 54 people were killed, with 37 of them children, news agencies reported....

Need I even say it? The difference, of course, is that the Palestinians attack children ON PURPOSE, not by accident. When you firebomb a school bus, there isn't a lot of doubt what you were trying to do.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Sun 30 Jul, 2006 10:36 pm
Oh, but Brandon, What about the many instances in which a bomber boarded buses to blow men women and children to smithereens, or when a bomber went into a night club or a food market. Doesn't that count? How can the Israelis justify those killings--

I'm sorry.I meant the Islamo-Fascist Fanatics.

The Isreali never did those things.

************************************************************

You know, of course,Brandon, that the Islamo_fascist murderers have proven that the are maniacs. It has been clearly established that they set up their headquarters and central posts in areas where there are many women and children so that they can point the finger at the Israelis and call them killers when an Isreali bomb kills Hezbollahs as well as innocents who are being used as human shields by the Maniac Islamists.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:36 am
BernardR wrote:
Oh, but Brandon, What about the many instances in which a bomber boarded buses to blow men women and children to smithereens, or when a bomber went into a night club or a food market. Doesn't that count? How can the Israelis justify those killings--

I'm sorry.I meant the Islamo-Fascist Fanatics.

The Isreali never did those things.


Instead, the Zionist terrorists, groups such as the Irgun and LEHI, who were to abet in the creation of the state of Israel preferred to hide time bombs in milk cans placed in Arab markets as their modus operandi. LEHI would routinely rob banks in Palestine to finance their terrorist operations.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:53 am
InfraBlue wrote:
BernardR wrote:
Oh, but Brandon, What about the many instances in which a bomber boarded buses to blow men women and children to smithereens, or when a bomber went into a night club or a food market. Doesn't that count? How can the Israelis justify those killings--

I'm sorry.I meant the Islamo-Fascist Fanatics.

The Isreali never did those things.


Instead, the Zionist terrorists, groups such as the Irgun and LEHI, who were to abet in the creation of the state of Israel preferred to hide time bombs in milk cans placed in Arab markets as their modus operandi. LEHI would routinely rob banks in Palestine to finance their terrorist operations.

And the past 50 years???? Want to tell me about Israel deliberately taregetting innocents in the last half centiry? The Palestinians do it almost continuously.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:55 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
InfraBlue wrote:
BernardR wrote:
Oh, but Brandon, What about the many instances in which a bomber boarded buses to blow men women and children to smithereens, or when a bomber went into a night club or a food market. Doesn't that count? How can the Israelis justify those killings--

I'm sorry.I meant the Islamo-Fascist Fanatics.

The Isreali never did those things.


Instead, the Zionist terrorists, groups such as the Irgun and LEHI, who were to abet in the creation of the state of Israel preferred to hide time bombs in milk cans placed in Arab markets as their modus operandi. LEHI would routinely rob banks in Palestine to finance their terrorist operations.

And the past 50 years???? Want to tell me about Israel deliberately taregetting innocents in the last half centiry? The Palestinians do it almost continuously.


The Zionist terrorists got what they wanted. The Palestinian terrorists haven't.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jul, 2006 02:01 am
InfraBlue wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
InfraBlue wrote:
BernardR wrote:
Oh, but Brandon, What about the many instances in which a bomber boarded buses to blow men women and children to smithereens, or when a bomber went into a night club or a food market. Doesn't that count? How can the Israelis justify those killings--

I'm sorry.I meant the Islamo-Fascist Fanatics.

The Isreali never did those things.


Instead, the Zionist terrorists, groups such as the Irgun and LEHI, who were to abet in the creation of the state of Israel preferred to hide time bombs in milk cans placed in Arab markets as their modus operandi. LEHI would routinely rob banks in Palestine to finance their terrorist operations.

And the past 50 years???? Want to tell me about Israel deliberately taregetting innocents in the last half centiry? The Palestinians do it almost continuously.


The Zionist terrorists got what they wanted. The Palestinian terrorists haven't.

Your side firebombs children and the Israelis respond with actions against combatants. It's the difference between civilized people and animans.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jul, 2006 02:08 am
My side does't side with terrorists or war pigs.

Were the Zionist terrorists animals?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jul, 2006 02:19 am
InfraBlue wrote:
My side does't side with terrorists or war pigs.

Were the Zionist terrorists animals?

Your side attacks women and children on purpose, and the Israelis do not. Care to challenge that assertion without changing the subject? And don't tell me about stuff that happened before 1950.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jul, 2006 02:24 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
InfraBlue wrote:
My side does't side with terrorists or war pigs.

Were the Zionist terrorists animals?

Your side attacks women and children on purpose, and the Israelis do not. Care to challenge that assertion without changing the subject? And don't tell me about stuff that happened before 1950.


Brandon, you must be aware that hundreds of women and children are dying daily under Israeli bombardment. The best you can say is that the Israelis are caleless that women and children are close to their intended targets. But I think it is worse than that. They kill civilians because they want to depopulate the target areas.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Jews.
  3. » Page 29
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/21/2025 at 04:45:00