@InfraBlue,
That is incorrect. The term "assault weapon" applies only if a gun is capable of full-auto.
That is incorrect. Your 1994 law focused on pistol grips on ordinary hunting rifles, and did not address assault weapons in any way.
InfraBlue wrote:That is contrary to what you need to do.
I'm not a serf and you aren't my lord. You have no say over what I do or don't need.
InfraBlue wrote:What he wrote does not preclude the good regulation of the keeping and bearing of arms.
True. But Alexander Hamilton's words do make it clear that the only thing that "good regulation" means is that the militia in question can fight as a single coherent unit instead of fighting as a bunch of random individuals.
Sort of like the gears in a "well-regulated" watch all work together as a single coherent unit.
That is incorrect. The NRA continues to defend people's civil liberties. You will never be able to stop them.
InfraBlue wrote:Yes you did.
That is incorrect. I did not paraphrase your argument.
My statement that you have mislabeled as a "paraphrase of your argument" is actually an explanation as to how your logic is catastrophically bad.
InfraBlue wrote:No it's not.
That is incorrect. My statement that you have mislabeled as a "paraphrase of your argument" is actually an explanation as to how your logic is catastrophically bad.
Perhaps you disagree with my assessment of your logic. But that does not change the fact that my statement was an assessment of your logic, and was not a paraphrase of your argument.
InfraBlue wrote:Your non-address of the argument continues.
That is incorrect. "Pointing out that we've already been registering guns for more than 50 years now" directly addresses "calling for us to start registering guns."