Guns: how much longer will it take ....

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

clear case of sociopathy.

Not at all. You deserve to get no new gun laws. You're just getting what you deserve.

@oralloy,

Since you have absolutely no sway with legislators or courts or public opinion whatever nonsense you spout falls instantly into the cesspool and is swallowed up into oblivion. Slowly but surely the gun laws are coming.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

I'm a gun rights activist. If you think that the gun rights community holds no sway with legislators, then you are fooling yourself.

I don't need to hold sway with the courts. They are perfectly capable of striking down unconstitutional laws without hearing from me.

So like the Soup Nazi says, no new gun laws for you.

And while my contribution was certainly minuscule, I have in fact contributed to something that nine certain justices over in DC actually looked at while they were contemplating the meaning of the Second Amendment.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

We're actually about a month away from the Supreme Court deciding whether to go forward with their fourth modern gun case.

The possibility that they might go forward with the case has progressives in such a blind panic that a group of progressive senators actually threatened the Supreme Court with "restructuring" if they go forward with the case.

http://www.nationalreview.com/2019/08/democratic-senators-threaten-supreme-court/

As if progressives actually have the votes to restructure the Supreme Court in some way.

(note: nine laughing faces there)

I hope Trump has the next nominee all ready to go in case one of the progressive justices keels over. It would be good to get one more conservative vote lined up before they make any more decisions about the case.

0 Replies

@Baldimo,

I don't mean anything. We protect our children from the NRA something that horrifies you.

I note you become hysterical when your precious 2nd amendment gets threatened, but you keep quiet when Oralloy fantasises about sexually assaulting the corpses of children murdered by the NRA.

It doesn't take long for your true colours to come out.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

I've never done any such thing, and neither has the NRA.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Urinating on bodies is a form of sexual assault, and that particular vile fantasy of yours has been prominent over the last couple of pages.

The NRA is responsible for all deaths, that's already been established.

Human beings feel empathy for others, particularly children, it's impossible not to feel something if you're a fully functional human being.

Not only do you feel nothing, you go the other way and indulge in your sick fantasies about golden showers and necrophilia.

That's the sort of creature you are, and it's why you're so opposed to background checks.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

Urinating on bodies is a form of sexual assault,

No it isn't.

izzythepush wrote:

The NRA is responsible for all deaths,

No it isn't.

izzythepush wrote:

that's already been established.

No it hasn't.

izzythepush wrote:

Not only do you feel nothing,

Nonsense. I feel great satisfaction when these progressive monsters get what they deserve (which is to helplessly watch these massacres while nothing is done).

izzythepush wrote:

your sick fantasies about golden showers and necrophilia.

No such fantasies.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

It's a bit late to deny it now.

We can see your true colours and they're not nice.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

The perfect time to deny all of your false accusations is right when you make them.

When progressives think I'm not nice, that means I'm doing something right.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

I don't need to do anything, all you're doing is confirming my suspicions.

You keep slipping up because you're not smart enough to maintain the illusion.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

No such slip ups. No such illusions. And my IQ is 170.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Wrong, wrong wrong.

It's not opposite day today.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

Nope. My IQ is 170.

Your slip up and illusion gibberish, is just gibberish.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Has anybody ever believed your nonsense about being smart? All the evidence is to the contrary.

Everyone I've spoken to on A2K thinks you're extremely unintelligent.

Your IQ is back to front, claiming it's 170 is absurd, 71 however, is more fitting and would explain your inability to talk coherently.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

Has anybody ever believed your nonsense about being smart?

Most people realize it without being told.

izzythepush wrote:

All the evidence is to the contrary.

Wrong. My record shows my high IQ.

Note your inability to ever point out anything that I'm wrong about for example.

izzythepush wrote:

Everyone I've spoken to on A2K thinks you're extremely unintelligent.

It is the nature of low-IQ leftist types to act that way towards smart people.

izzythepush wrote:

Your IQ is back to front, claiming it's 170 is absurd,

Your refusal to accept reality is irrelevant.

izzythepush wrote:

your inability to talk coherently.

You cannot provide any examples of any such lack of ability on my part.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

I realised you had a limited vocabulary, were incapable of reason and had problems understanding simple points when I first got here. Most people would have done the same.

You live in a fantasy world, and it turns out it's a sick fantasy world.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

I realised you had a limited vocabulary,

You cannot provide any examples of a limited vocabulary on my part.

izzythepush wrote:

were incapable of reason

You cannot point out any errors in my logic.

izzythepush wrote:

and had problems understanding simple points when I first got here.

You cannot provide a single example of me ever having trouble understanding something.

I can provide an example of you taking the better part of a day to figure out a point that took me a few seconds to figure out.

izzythepush wrote:

You live in a fantasy world, and it turns out it's a sick fantasy world.

You cannot point out anything incorrect in any of my posts.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

I can provide an example of you taking the better part of a day to figure out a point that took me a few seconds to figure out.

Funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-1#post-6356098

My instantaneous understanding of funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-1#post-6356102

Izzythepush not instantly understanding funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-2#post-6356165

Funny joke explained to Izzythepush some hours later:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-2#post-6356467

Izzythepush finally gets funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-2#post-6356482

1 Reply

@oralloy,

That's funny is it? If you look at the times you will notice that my post is first thing in the morning when I'd just got up.

Your post was about midnight-1am when you'd already been up for hours.

That's how you've been spending the early hours of Saturday morning.

You've certainly managed to prove something.

0 Replies

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know