Guns: how much longer will it take ....

Make the guns look like an assault weapon and some lunatic will use it to take out as many people as possible while he goes out in a Blaze Of Glory.

But you don't get that, even though you see it happening again and again.

Make the guns look like an assault weapon and some lunatic will use it to take out as many people as possible while he goes out in a Blaze Of Glory. But you don't get that, even though you see it happening again and again.

A semiauto assault weapon is the deadliest gun next to an automatic assault weapon.

So the deranged assailant will not have the firepower that he now can have.

Semiautomatic action in a powerful rifle designed for use as an assault weapon is too much power for lunatics to have.

And the NRA has done its best to see that as many lunatics can get their hands on these as possible.

Give it a scary name because it looks scary and people will fear it. Propaganda at it's worst. Goebbels would be proud of the American left and the BS they create against the second Amendment.

These guns work no different than any other semi-auto rifle, handgun or shotgun. You just don't like the way they look.

That is incorrect. They are just ordinary rifles and there is no justification for banning them.

If there is no justification for depriving someone of guns, then they have the right to have guns.

These are the guns which are killing people in mass murders.

No, I just don't like the way they are used by lunatics to go through buildings killing people.

They are the semiautomatic version of automatic assault rifles, which lunatics are increasingly using to take as many innocents as possible with them in their Blaze Of Glory.

And being mentally ill is a good reason to prevent someone from owning that much firepower.

The Second Amendment is not an issue, you are entitled to be armed, it does not say you can own any type of arm you wish.

These are the guns which are killing people in mass murders. None of your failing attempts to get around that will work.

No, I just don't like the way they are used by lunatics to go through buildings killing people.

That's why they have to go, along with the NRA's bought legislators who let the slaughters continue.

These are the guns which are killing people in mass murders. None of your failing attempts to get around that will work.

Except where the mass shooter uses guns that don't fit this "theme". I've brought to light which shootings have taken place without an AR type rifle, you just choose to ignore them.

So you're essentially saying that as long as there are mass shootings which don't involve AR-15 type weapons, we can't ban AR-15 type weapons.

Either all types of guns have to go or none of them can go, no in-between. And you're against all types going.

Does that correctly state your position?

So you're essentially saying that as long as there are mass shootings which don't involve AR-15 type weapons, we can't ban AR-15 type weapons. Either all types of guns have to go or none of them can go, no in-between. And you're against all types going.

Now you've got it. It makes no sense to ban a weapon because you think it's scary and you think it is so deadly.

So then, following the same logic, we can assume that you also favor dropping the present ban on automatic weapons and machine guns as well, since you feel strongly the blame for bad events should fall on the person doing the shooting, not on inanimate objects?

But let's pass the SHARE Act first.

I dont like the implied authority (or lack of).

This was obviously written by NRA.

So then, following the same logic, we can assume that you also favor dropping the present ban on automatic weapons and machine guns as well, since you feel strongly the blame for bad events should fall on the person doing the shooting, not on inanimate objects?