1
   

Elizabeth Edwards Confronts Ann Coulter

 
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 10:36 am
lynn cheney wouldn't go. the cheneys are without human feelings so why would they be upset about mahers remarks?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 10:37 am
HokieBird wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You find Coulter, and the reactions to her, Funny, for the same reason as McG: you are a bully who delights in seeing others get mad.

Cycloptichorn


The reason Ann makes you and most liberals so 'mad' (doesn't take much, I have to admit) is she exposes your hypocrisy.

You lefty trolls have no problem with the crap spewed by Maher, Franken, Rosie O, but let Ann make a point (and she did) about your double-standards and you're suddenly up in arms.

When is Lynn Cheney going to be invited on Matthews' show to ask Bill Maher (in southern-polite fashion) to stop saying vile things about her husband?


What foolishness you spout, Hokie.

The folks you mention make their trade in far more ways then just insulting and being hateful, whereas that's Ann's bread and butter.

Remember that she was fired from NRO for exactly this sort of behavior? It isn't only lefties that find her to be abhorrent, but many across the spectrum.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 10:58 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
lynn cheney wouldn't go. the cheneys are without human feelings so why would they be upset about mahers remarks?


John and Elizabeth Edwards treated the Cheneys as sub-human during the '04 campaign and look how that backfired on them. You'd think they'd learn, but that would mean they'd gained some dignity and class.

They haven't, and this latest grovelling for 'donations' just proves that.
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:11 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
It isn't only lefties that find her to be abhorrent, but many across the spectrum.

Cycloptichorn


That's my point. But it is only lefties who will give Bill Maher a free pass. It's a guarantee that Maher calling for the death of the Vice-President will only be met with silence from you and your ilk.

Yet you expect everyone to go after Ann.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:17 am
HokieBird wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
It isn't only lefties that find her to be abhorrent, but many across the spectrum.

Cycloptichorn


That's my point. But it is only lefties who will give Bill Maher a free pass. It's a guarantee that Maher calling for the death of the Vice-President will only be met with silence from you and your ilk.

Yet you expect everyone to go after Ann.


There is a substantial difference between making a joke about a sitting politician, and making fun of a person's dead son. I guess it takes a sense of decency to see the difference.

I don't expect everyone to go after Ann. After all, plenty of mouth-breathers buy her books, so she does have a market. You can't legislate taste and decency, so some folks will never have it.

I think that Rosie is hateful at times (she was making fun of chinese folks on TV a while back, which isn't too cool) and I certainly don't support everything she says. She has the right to say it, just like Coulter has the right to say her piece. But you don't see Libs reposting Maher or O'Donnell pieces here to get a rise out of Conservatives, because it just isn't as appealing to us to do such things as it is to Republicans.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:17 am
And Bill Maher was fired from ABC for telling us all about the brave terrorists who actually stayed inside the planes that killed thousands of Americans.

The left must have howled over that one.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:21 am
HokieBird wrote:
And Bill Maher was fired from ABC for telling us all about the brave terrorists who actually stayed inside the planes that killed thousands of Americans.

The left must have howled over that one.


Really? Maybe you can find some evidence that the left 'howled' over that one. Though I doubt it; when challenged to provide evidence or explanation, you have retreated from the field on more then one occasion.

Actually, his point is still correct. The terrorists on 9/11, while evil and misguided, certainly weren't cowards.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:25 am
Oh yes they were you vile piece of crap. They went after civilians.

What the hell is wrong with you?
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:25 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
.... you don't see Libs reposting Maher or O'Donnell pieces here to get a rise out of Conservatives, because it just isn't as appealing to us to do such things as it is to Republicans.

Cycloptichorn


Anything can get a rise out of a liberal. Seething and temper tantrums define them. It's funny.

Here you go........try to contain your anger.

Quote:
THAT WAS NO LADY ?- THAT WAS MY HUSBAND
June 28, 2007

The Edwards campaign is apparently still running low on donations, so this week they went back to their top fundraiser: me.

I doubled the ratings of the lowest-rated cable news show on Tuesday by agreeing to go on for a full hour to promote my new paperback version of "Godless" ?- a mistake I won't make again. As I was walking to the set, minutes before airtime, it was casually mentioned to me that Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, might call in.

For the first time in recorded history, the show's host did not interrupt a guest, but let Elizabeth Edwards ramble on and on, allowing her to browbeat me for being mean to her husband. (This delicate flower is very sensitive to rough words, having hired the Edwards' campaign staffer who wrote this: "What if Mary had taken Plan B after the Lord filled her with his hot, white, sticky Holy Spirit"?)

Say, did any TV host ever surprise Al Franken, Bill Maher or Arianna Huffington with a call by the wife of someone they've made nasty remarks about? How about a call to John Edwards from the wife of a doctor he bankrupted with his junk-science lawsuits?

I think I may have tuned out at some point, so I can only speak to the first 45 minutes of Elizabeth Edwards' harangue, but it mostly consisted of utterly dishonest renditions of things I had said on my "Good Morning America" interview this week and a column I wrote four years ago. (You can't rush Edwards' "rapid response team"!) She claimed I had launched unprovoked attacks on the Edwards' dead son and called for a terrorist attack on her husband.

These are bald-faced lies, and the mainstream media knows they are lies. Yet they were repeated ad nauseam on Wednesday by The Associated Press, the AOL pop-up window, CNN, NBC and ?- stunningly ?- the host of the lowest-rated cable show himself, who personally told me he knew the truth.

So for those of you who haven't read any of my five best-selling books: Liberals are driven by Satan and lie constantly.

Here is my full sentence on "Good Morning America," which the media deceptively truncated, referring to a joke I told about Edwards six months ago that made liberals cry: "But about the same time, you know, Bill Maher was not joking and saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack ?- so I've learned my lesson: If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."

The usual nut Web sites posted a zillion denunciations of my appearance on "Good Morning America" immediately after I appeared Monday morning. But it didn't occur to any of them to simply lie about what I had said. No, it took them nearly 36 hours to concoct a version of that quote that included the Edwards part, but not the Maher part, or what English language speakers call: "the point."

By tomorrow it will be: "Ann Coulter tried to kill John Edwards on 'Good Morning America'!"

Judging by his fundraising efforts so far, I gather most of you don't know who John Edwards is ?- unless you're an overpriced hair dresser. He's the trial lawyer who pretended in court to channel the spirit of a handicapped fetus in front of illiterate jurors to scam tens of millions of dollars off of innocent doctors. According to The New York Times, Edwards told one jury: "She speaks to you through me ... And I have to tell you right now ?- I didn't plan to talk about this ?- right now I feel her. I feel her presence. She's inside me, and she's talking to you."

Let me also quote from campaign consultant Bob Shrum's book "No Excuses":

"(Kerry) was even queasier about Edwards after they met. Edwards had told Kerry he was going to share a story with him that he'd never told anyone else ?- that after his son Wade had been killed, he climbed onto the slab at the funeral home, laid there and hugged his body, and promised that he'd do all he could to make life better for people, to live up to Wade's ideals of service. Kerry was stunned, not moved, because, as he told me later, Edwards had recounted the same exact story to him, almost in the exact same words, a year or two before ?- and with the same preface, that he'd never shared the memory with anyone else. Kerry said he found it chilling, and he decided he couldn't pick Edwards unless he met with him again."

Apparently every time Edwards began a story about his dead son with "I've never told anyone this before," everyone on the campaign could lip-sync the story with him.

As a commentator, I bring facts like these to the attention of the American people in a lively way. Thus, for example, in a column about the Democratic candidates for president written in 2003, I pointed out that the Democrats refused to discuss the economy or the war, but had recently "discovered a surprise campaign issue: It turns out that several of them have had a death in the family."

Among several examples of Democrats talking about a death in the family on the campaign trail was this one:

John Edwards injects his son's fatal car accident into his campaign by demanding that everyone notice how he refuses to inject his son's fatal car accident into his campaign.

Edwards has talked about his son's death in a 1996 car accident on "Good Morning America," in dozens of profiles and in his new book. ("It was and is the most important fact of my life.") His 1998 Senate campaign ads featured film footage of Edwards at a learning lab he founded in honor of his son, titled "The Wade Edwards Learning Lab." He wears his son's Outward Bound pin on his suit lapel. He was going to wear it on his sleeve, until someone suggested that might be a little too "on the nose."

If you want points for not using your son's death politically, don't you have to take down all those "Ask me about my son's death in a horrific car accident" bumper stickers? Edwards is like a politician who keeps announcing that he will not use his opponent's criminal record for partisan political advantage.

Manifestly, I was not making fun of their son's death; I was making fun of John Edwards' incredibly creepy habit of invoking his son's tragic death to advance his political career ?- a practice so repellant, it even made John Kerry queasy.

I'm a little tired of losers trying to raise campaign cash or TV ratings off of my coattails, particularly when they use their afflictions or bereavement schedules to try to silence the opposition. From now on, I'm attacking only serious presidential candidates, like Dennis Kucinich.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:26 am
cjhsa wrote:
Oh yes they were you vile piece of crap. They went after civilians.

What the hell is wrong with you?


Really? We bomb civilians to achieve our ends, and I don't see you calling the US cowardly.

There's nothing wrong with me at all. In fact, hearing such a statement from you confirms that things are right with me, as I strive to be as opposite from your lunacy as possible.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:28 am
Quote:

Anything can get a rise out of a liberal. Seething and temper tantrums define them. It's funny.


You think it's funny, because you are a bully and a jerk, just like she is. There's really no other explanation; most people don't find it funny to make others mad.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:28 am
We never target civilians - EVER.

We should more often though. Many of them aren't.
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:29 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
HokieBird wrote:
And Bill Maher was fired from ABC for telling us all about the brave terrorists who actually stayed inside the planes that killed thousands of Americans.

The left must have howled over that one.


Really? Maybe you can find some evidence that the left 'howled' over that one. Though I doubt it; when challenged to provide evidence or explanation, you have retreated from the field on more then one occasion.

Actually, his point is still correct. The terrorists on 9/11, while evil and misguided, certainly weren't cowards.

Cycloptichorn


Your definition of 'coward' doesn't surprise me. I'm sure it was the men, women and children killed that were the 'cowards' on in your twisted mind on 9/11.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:30 am
Cy is showing us just how vile the left has become. It's beyond sad or even maddening. It's just f--king vile.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:32 am
cjhsa wrote:
We never target civilians - EVER.

We should more often though. Many of them aren't.


You are living in a fantasy world, my friend, for we do target civilians when it's deemed necessary.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19318805/

We knew there were kids there, but deemed it 'worth the collateral damage' to potentially kill a terrorist leader, who turned out not to be there.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:33 am
HokieBird wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
HokieBird wrote:
And Bill Maher was fired from ABC for telling us all about the brave terrorists who actually stayed inside the planes that killed thousands of Americans.

The left must have howled over that one.


Really? Maybe you can find some evidence that the left 'howled' over that one. Though I doubt it; when challenged to provide evidence or explanation, you have retreated from the field on more then one occasion.

Actually, his point is still correct. The terrorists on 9/11, while evil and misguided, certainly weren't cowards.

Cycloptichorn


Your definition of 'coward' doesn't surprise me. I'm sure it was the men, women and children killed that were the 'cowards' on in your twisted mind on 9/11.


Your attempt to impugn my morality and mindset falls flat, for I really couldn't care less that people who have shown themselves to delight in the anger and frustration of others, have to say about myself. You don't have the moral standing to judge me.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:35 am
cjhsa wrote:
Cy is showing us just how vile the left has become. It's beyond sad or even maddening. It's just f--king vile.


Laughing Laughing This from a guy whose tagline is:

'Liberalism is a mental illness. '

You really are a laff riot, Ceej.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:35 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You don't have the moral standing to judge me.

Cycloptichorn


I do. You live in Bezerkeley, the liberal numbnut capitol of the west. 'nuff said.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:36 am
My signature is quite correct, TYVM.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:38 am
cjhsa wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You don't have the moral standing to judge me.

Cycloptichorn


I do. You live in Bezerkeley, the liberal numbnut capitol of the west. 'nuff said.


Yes, because the location where someone lives is indicative of everything about the person.

With each and every post you prove yourself to be more intelligent and a better debater, worthy of the respect of all here on A2K. And your insults are cutting and devastating, why, I'm crushed by the judgement you have passed on me, really.

/sarcasm

You're going to have a to do a lot better then this if you expect to be anything other then the resident A2K fool.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/12/2026 at 01:21:40