9
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, ELEVENTH THREAD

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:44 pm
From AP:

The White House said 5,700 troops would be home by Christmas.

Bush's speech was the latest turning point in a 4 1/2-year-old war marred by miscalculations, surprises and setbacks.

Almost since the fall of Baghdad, in April 2003, U.S. commanders and administration officials in Washington mistakenly believed they were on track to winding down U.S. involvement and handing off to the Iraqis. Instead, the insurgency intervened and the reality of a country in chaos conspired to deepen the U.S. commitment.


Still no articulation on how he intends to "succeed."
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:47 pm
SISYPHUS trying to push the rock up the hill - unfortunately it keeps rolling down !

http://www.mythweb.com/encyc/zooms/sisyphus.gif

wears him out eventually !
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 07:29 pm
hamburger wrote:
SISYPHUS trying to push the rock up the hill - unfortunately it keeps rolling down !
...
wears him out eventually !

Why did he bother?
Sitting at the bottom of the hill, the rock was a threat to no one.

I think al-Qaeda is more like a beginning avalanche that we cannot avoid unless we leave the hill altogether--anyone for Mars--jump into whatever caverns are available below it, try to deflect it, or diminish it by bulldozing as much as we can before it can fully break loose.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 07:43 pm
unfortunately sisyphus was not given a choice in the matter .

"In Greek mythology, Sisyphus (Σίσυφος) (IPA: ['sɪsɪfəs]) was a king punished in the Tartarus by being cursed to roll a huge boulder up a hill throughout eternity." .

btw al-qaeda was considered a useful ally in defeating the soviets in afghanistan - it seems that they are now demanding "their pound of flesh" .

the saudis were pretty cagey in being able to convince the americans to accept the al-qaeda group as their allies to fight the soviets - it made them move out of saudi-arabia . unfortunately it is now the U.S. and their allies who have fight their former ally while the saudis have cleverly distanced themselves from them - pretty smart operators imo .
hbg
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 09:11 pm
hamburger wrote:
unfortunately sisyphus was not given a choice in the matter .

"In Greek mythology, Sisyphus (Σίσυφος) (IPA: ['sɪsɪfəs]) was a king punished in the Tartarus by being cursed to roll a huge boulder up a hill throughout eternity." .
...
hbg

Smile
If I had written that mythology, I would have had Sisyphus refuse to comply.

Better dead than red!
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 10:17 am
Ican, the whitehouse has admitted in july of 2003 that the documents he cited in his state of union address of Januray 2003 were frauds. He knew before he cited it that the documents were probably a haux. Yet he cited it anyway in his zeal the puff up the case to go to war with Iraq.

Quote:
Wednesday, 9 July, 2003, On Tuesday the White House acknowledged that allegations that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from the African state of Niger were based on forged documents
. source

Quote:


source
(for more on the whole niger thing go to the source above.)


Quote:
In October 2002, a file of documents from the U.S. embassy in Rome arrived on the desk of one of the State Department's senior nuclear proliferation analysts. The papers had been handed over by an Italian journalist, who had been given them by an informer who had, in turn, obtained them from a mysterious source in the embassy of Niger. The documents purported to show that Niger had signed a July 2000 deal to supply Iraq with 500 tons of yellowcake uranium -- about one-sixth of the African country's annual production and a key ingredient in a uranium-enrichment process that could provide Saddam Hussein's regime with a nuclear bomb.

As Simon Dodge of the State Department's intelligence bureau began to review the documents in Washington, he soon concluded that they were fakes. One of the papers described a secret meeting in Rome at which representatives of Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Libya and Pakistan formed a joint "plan of action" to defend themselves against the West in alliance with "Islamic patriots accused of belonging to criminal organizations." Dodge later told Senate investigators that he considered the claim "completely implausible," or, as Michael Isikoff and David Corn put it, "something out of James Bond -- or maybe Austin Powers." Niger embassy stamps, palpably fake, linked the "plan of action" document to those depicting the Iraq deal. The papers are a hoax, Dodge e-mailed colleagues.


source

Quote:
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
Source: President Delivers "State of the Union", White House (1/28/2003).

This statement was misleading because it suggested that Iraq sought uranium from Africa despite the fact that the CIA expressed doubts about the credibility of this claim in two memos to the White House, including one addressed to National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. CIA Director George Tenet also warned against using the claim in a telephone call to Ms. Rice's deputy. In addition, the statement fails to mention that State Department intelligence officials also concluded that this claim was "highly dubious."



source

For more misleading statements of bush go the source above; for other go Here

Ican, there is no other realiable intellegence out there which supports your claims that there were other sources which supported the case for war. As this post and others better formed has shown, the WH has proven to be unrealible to be trusted which has been my only point with all this. As for the danger now for Iraqis if we leave; I am of two minds about it. I think most people are. And now I am finished.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 10:20 am
Quote:
IBC's Count of Violent Civilian Deaths in Iraq since 1/1/2003
iraq body count as of 07/31/2007

MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE MASS MURDER OF NON-MURDERERS IN IRAQ

............................... Monthly ........... Accumulated Total since
............................... Totals .............. January 1st 2003 ...........
December 2005 ............ ------ ..................... 36,859
January 2006 ............... 1,267 .................... 38,126
February 2006 .............. 1,287 .................... 39,413
March 2006 .................. 1,538 .................... 40,951
April 2006 .................... 1,287.................... 42,238
May 2006 ..................... 1,417 .................... 43,655
June 2006 ..................... 2,089 .................... 45,744
July 2006 ...................... 2,336 .................... 48,080
August 2006 ................ 1,195 .................... 49,275
September 2006 .......... 1,407..................... 50,682
October 2006 .............. 2,546 ..................... 53,228
November 2006 .......... 3,894 ..................... 57,122
December 2006 .......... 3,219 ..................... 60,341
January 2007 .............. 2,557 ..................... 62,898
February 2007 ............. 2,514 ..................... 65,412
March 2007 .....…......... 2,720 .................... 68,132
April 2007 .…....…........ 2,359..........…........ 70,491
May 2007 .......…......... 3,755 ......…............ 74,246
June 2007 .......…......... 2,386 .........…......... 76,632
July 2007 ..........…....... 2,077 .....…............. 78,709
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 10:32 am
ican, You're ignoring revel's post; why don't you respond? Bush started his illegal war on lies.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 11:02 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
ican, You're ignoring revel's post; why don't you respond? Bush started his illegal war on lies.

You are lying!

My last post was posted today at 10:20 am.
Revel's last post was posted today at 10:17 am
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 11:12 am
So, what has your 10:20 post vs revel's 10:17 post have anything to do with revel's? Nothing.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 11:48 am
revel wrote:
Ican, the whitehouse has admitted in july of 2003 that the documents he cited in his state of union address of Januray 2003 were frauds. He knew before he cited it that the documents were probably a haux. Yet he cited it anyway in his zeal the puff up the case to go to war with Iraq.

Yes, the Whitehouse admitted in July those documents were frauds. No, the Whitehouse did not admit that it knew they were frauds at the time the Whitehouse cited those documents. You have not provided any evidence that the Whitehouse did know those documents were frauds at the time the Whitehouse cited those documents.

However, I readily admit the Whitehouse was incompetent to trust those documents.

Another however, subsequently, it was alleged there was found evidence that Saddam did inquire about obtaining yellow cake from Niger. I cannot yet find sufficient corroboration of that allegation to trust it.

...

Ican, there is no other realiable intellegence out there which supports your claims that there were other sources which supported the case for war.

I have repeatedly provided the evidence that there are other sources which supported the case for war. See that evidence again, below.

As this post and others better formed has shown, the WH has proven to be unrealible to be trusted which has been my only point with all this. As for the danger now for Iraqis if we leave; I am of two minds about it. I think most people are. And now I am finished.

I agree!


The reasons given in the following quotes for invading Iraq and Afghanistan are the stated primary valid and sufficient reasons, regardless of whether any other reasons Bush et al gave are valid or invalid, and sufficient or insufficient.

UN CHARTER wrote:
Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.


Congress wrote:

Congress's Joint Resolution September 14, 2001

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
...
(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.


Congress wrote:

Congress's Joint Resolution Oct. 16, 2002
Public Law 107-243 107th Congress Joint Resolution (H.J. Res. 114) To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
...
[10th]Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

[11th]Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens;
...


General Tommy Franks wrote:

American Soldier, by General Tommy Franks, 7/1/2004
"10" Regan Books, An Imprint of HarperCollins Publishers

page 483:
"The air picture changed once more. Now the icons were streaming toward two ridges an a steep valley in far northeastern Iraq, right on the border with Iran. These were the camps of the Ansar al-Isla terrorists, where al Qaeda leader Abu Musab Zarqawi had trained disciples in the use of chemical and biological weapons. But this strike was more than just another [Tomahawk Land Attack Missile] bashing. Soon Special Forces and [Special Mission Unit] operators, leading Kurdish Peshmerga fighters, would be storming the camps, collecting evidence, taking prisoners, and killing all those who resisted."

page 519:
"[The Marines] also encountered several hundred foreign fighters from Egypt, the Sudan, Syria, and Lybia who were being trained by the regime in a camp south of Baghdad. Those foreign volunteers fought with suicidal ferocity, but they did not fight well. The Marines killed them all. "


Senate Select Committee wrote:

Congressional Intelligence Report 09/08/2006
REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
Conclusion 6. Postwar information indicates that the Intelligence Community accurately assessed that al-Qa'ida affiliate group Ansar al-Islam operated in Kurdish-controlled northeastern Iraq, an area that Baghdad had not controlled since 1991.


Wikipedia wrote:

ANSAR AL-ISLAM
Ansar al-Islam (Supporters or Partisans of Islam) is a Kurdish Sunni Islamist group, promoting a radical interpretation of Islam and holy war. At the beginning of the 2003 invasion of Iraq it controlled about a dozen villages and a range of peaks in northern Iraq on the Iranian border. It has used tactics such as suicide bombers in its conflicts with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and other Kurdish groups.

Ansar al-Islam was formed in December 2001 as a merger of Jund al-Islam (Soldiers of Islam), led by Abu Abdallah al-Shafi'i, and a splinter group from the Islamic Movement in Kurdistan led by Mullah Krekar. Krekar became the leader of the merged Ansar al-Islam, which opposed an agreement made between IMK and the dominant Kurdish group in the area, Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK).

Ansar al-Islam fortified a number of villages along the Iranian border, with Iranian artillery support.[1] Ansar al-Islam quickly initiated a number of attacks on the peshmerga (armed forces) of the PUK, on one occasion massacring 53 prisoners and beheading them. Several assassination attempts on leading PUK-politicians were also made with carbombs and snipers.

Ansar al-Islam comprised about 300 armed men, many of these veterans from the Afghan war, and a proportion being neither Kurd nor Arab. Ansar al-Islam is alleged to be connected to al-Qaeda, and provided an entry point for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and other Afghan veterans to enter Iraq.


9/11 Commission wrote:

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
The Commission closed on August 21, 2004. This site is archived.
9/11 Commission Report

2 THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM

2.1 A DECLARATION OF WAR
In February 1998, the 40-year-old Saudi exile Usama Bin Ladin and a fugitive Egyptian physician, Ayman al Zawahiri, arranged from their Afghan headquarters for an Arabic newspaper in London to publish what they termed a fatwa issued in the name of a "World Islamic Front." A fatwa is normally an interpretation of Islamic law by a respected Islamic authority, but neither Bin Ladin, Zawahiri, nor the three others who signed this statement were scholars of Islamic law. Claiming that America had declared war against God and his messenger, they called for the murder of any American, anywhere on earth, as the "individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it."1

Three months later, when interviewed in Afghanistan by ABC-TV, Bin Ladin enlarged on these themes.2 He claimed it was more important for Muslims to kill Americans than to kill other infidels. "It is far better for anyone to kill a single American soldier than to squander his efforts on other activities," he said. Asked whether he approved of terrorism and of attacks on civilians, he replied: "We believe that the worst thieves in the world today and the worst terrorists are the Americans. Nothing could stop you except perhaps retaliation in kind. We do not have to differentiate between military or civilian. As far as we are concerned, they are all targets."
...
Plans to attack the United States were developed with unwavering single-mindedness throughout the 1990s. Bin Ladin saw himself as called "to follow in the footsteps of the Messenger and to communicate his message to all nations,"5 and to serve as the rallying point and organizer of a new kind of war to destroy America and bring the world to Islam.
...
9/11 Commission Report
2.3 THE RISE OF BIN LADIN AND AL QAEDA (1988-1992)
...
Bin Ladin understood better than most of the volunteers the extent to which the continuation and eventual success of the jihad in Afghanistan depended on an increasingly complex, almost worldwide organization. This organization included a financial support network that came to be known as the "Golden Chain," put together mainly by financiers in Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf states. Donations flowed through charities or other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Bin Ladin and the "Afghan Arabs" drew largely on funds raised by this network, whose agents roamed world markets to buy arms and supplies for the mujahideen, or "holy warriors."21
...
Bin Ladin now had a vision of himself as head of an international jihad confederation. In Sudan, he established an "Islamic Army Shura" that was to serve as the coordinating body for the consortium of terrorist groups with which he was forging alliances. It was composed of his own al Qaeda Shura together with leaders or representatives of terrorist organizations that were still independent. In building this Islamic army, he enlisted groups from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Oman, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Somalia, and Eritrea. Al Qaeda also established cooperative but less formal relationships with other extremist groups from these same countries; from the African states of Chad, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, and Uganda; and from the Southeast Asian states of Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Bin Ladin maintained connections in the Bosnian conflict as well.37 The groundwork for a true global terrorist network was being laid.
...
Bin Ladin seemed willing to include in the confederation terrorists from almost every corner of the Muslim world. His vision mirrored that of Sudan's Islamist leader, Turabi, who convened a series of meetings under the label Popular Arab and Islamic Conference around the time of Bin Ladin's arrival in that country. Delegations of violent Islamist extremists came from all the groups represented in Bin Ladin's Islamic Army Shura. Representatives also came from organizations such as the Palestine Liberation Organization, Hamas, and Hezbollah.51
...
9/11 Commission Report
2.5 AL QAEDA'S RENEWAL IN AFGHANISTAN (1996-1998)
...
The Taliban seemed to open the doors to all who wanted to come to Afghanistan to train in the camps. The alliance with the Taliban provided al Qaeda a sanctuary in which to train and indoctrinate fighters and terrorists, import weapons, forge ties with other jihad groups and leaders, and plot and staff terrorist schemes. While Bin Ladin maintained his own al Qaeda guesthouses and camps for vetting and training recruits, he also provided support to and benefited from the broad infrastructure of such facilities in Afghanistan made available to the global network of Islamist movements. U.S. intelligence estimates put the total number of fighters who underwent instruction in Bin Ladin-supported camps in Afghanistan from 1996 through 9/11 at 10,000 to 20,000. 78
...
Now effectively merged with Zawahiri's Egyptian Islamic Jihad,82 al Qaeda promised to become the general headquarters for international terrorism, without the need for the Islamic Army Shura. Bin Ladin was prepared to pick up where he had left off in Sudan. He was ready to strike at "the head of the snake."
...
On February 23, 1998, Bin Ladin issued his public fatwa. The language had been in negotiation for some time, as part of the merger under way between Bin Ladin's organization and Zawahiri's Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Less than a month after the publication of the fatwa, the teams that were to carry out the embassy attacks were being pulled together in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam. The timing and content of their instructions indicate that the decision to launch the attacks had been made by the time the fatwa was issued.88
...
9/11 Commission Report
The attack on the U.S. embassy in Nairobi destroyed the embassy and killed 12 Americans and 201 others, almost all Kenyans. About 5,000 people were injured. The attack on the U.S. embassy in Dar es Salaam killed 11 more people, none of them Americans. Interviewed later about the deaths of the Africans, Bin Ladin answered that "when it becomes apparent that it would be impossible to repel these Americans without assaulting them, even if this involved the killing of Muslims, this is permissible under Islam." Asked if he had indeed masterminded these bombings, Bin Ladin said that the World Islamic Front for jihad against "Jews and Crusaders" had issued a "crystal clear" fatwa. If the instigation for jihad against the Jews and the Americans to liberate the holy places "is considered a crime," he said, "let history be a witness that I am a criminal."93
...


al-Zawahiri wrote:
www.dni.gov/release_letter_101105.html
Summary of Letter from al-Zawahiri to al-Zarqawi July 9, 2005.
The war in Iraq is central to al Qa'ida's global jihad.
The war will not end with an American departure.
[/b]
The strategic vision is one of inevitable conflict with a call by al-Zawahiri for political action equal to military action.
More than half the struggle is taking place "in the battlefield of the media."
Popular support must be maintained at least until jihadist rule has been established.

firstcoastnews wrote:

Shiite sacred mosque explosion in Samarra
...
In Baghdad, National Security Adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie blamed religious zealots such as the al-Qaida terror network, telling Al-Arabiya television that the attack was an attempt "to pull Iraq toward civil war."

The country's most revered Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, sent instructions to his followers forbidding attacks on Sunni mosques, especially the major ones in Baghdad. He called for seven days of mourning, his aides said.
...
President Jalal Talabani condemned the attack and called for restraint, saying the attack was designed to sabotage talks on a government of national unity following the Dec. 15 parliamentary election.


CNN wrote:

Capture of al-Qaeda mastermind of Golden Mosque explosion
...
Abu Qudama operated under terrorist cell leader Haitham al-Badri.

Al-Badri was "a known terrorist," a member of Ansar al-Sunna before he joined terror group al Qaeda in Iraq, al-Rubaie said.

However, Iraqi authorities "were not aware of his being the mastermind behind the golden mosque explosion" until Abu Qudama's arrest, al-Rubaie said. "The sole reason behind his action was to drive a wedge between the Shiites and Sunnis and to ignite and trigger a sectarian war in this country," al-Rubaie said, referring to al-Badri.
…


usatoday wrote:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-11-10-iraq_x.htm?csp=34
Al-Qaeda in Iraq taunts Bush, claims it's winning war
Updated 11/10/2006 2:33 PM

BAGHDAD (AP) -- A recording Friday attributed to the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq mocked U.S. President George W. Bush as a coward whose conduct of the war had been rejected by U.S. voters, challenging him to keep American troops in the country to face more bloodshed.

"We haven't had enough of your blood yet," terror chieftain Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, identified as the speaker on the tape, said as he claimed to have 12,000 fighters under his command who "have vowed to die for God's sake."

The Egyptian said his fighters would not rest until they blew up the White House and occupied Jerusalem.


It was impossible to verify the authenticity of the 20-minute recording, posted on a website used by Islamic militants.

Al-Muhajir, also known as Abu Ayyub al-Masri, boasted that al-Qaeda in Iraq was moving toward victory faster than expected because of Bush's mistakes.
...


yahoo wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/iraq_dc
Dozens of al Qaeda killed in Anbar: Iraq police By Waleed Ibrahim and Ibon Villelabeitia
Thu Mar 1, 3:17 PM ET [2007]
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi security forces killed dozens of al Qaeda militants who attacked a village in western Anbar province on Wednesday, during fierce clashes that lasted much of the day, police officials said on Thursday.

Sunni tribal leaders are involved in a growing power struggle with Sunni al Qaeda for control of Anbar, a vast desert province that is the heart of the Sunni Arab insurgency in Iraq.

In Baghdad, U.S. and Iraqi troops are engaged in a security crackdown to stop bloodshed between Shi'ites and Sunni Arabs.

U.S. and Iraqi military officials said troops would soon launch aggressive operations to seize weapons and hunt gunmen in the Shi'ite militia bastion of Sadr City, signaling resolve to press ahead with the plan even in sensitive areas.

Dozens of loud explosions that sounded like mortar bombs rocked southern Baghdad in quick succession on Thursday evening, Reuters witnesses said.

Iraqi military spokesman Brigadier Qassim Moussawi said the blasts were part of the new security offensive, Iraqiya state television reported, without giving details. A U.S. military spokeswoman said she had no information on the explosions.

Interior Ministry spokesman Abdul Karim Khalaf said foreign Arabs and Afghans were among some 80 militants killed and 50 captured in the clashes in Amiriyat al Falluja, an Anbar village where local tribes had opposed al Qaeda.

A police official in the area, Ahmed al-Falluji, put the number of militants killed at 70, with three police officers killed. There was no immediate verification of the numbers.

A U.S. military spokesman in the nearby city of Falluja, Major Jeff Pool, said U.S. forces were not involved in the battle but had received reports from Iraqi police that it lasted most of Wednesday. He could not confirm the number killed.

Another police source in Falluja put the figure at dozens.

"Because it was so many killed we can't give an exact number for the death toll," the police source told Reuters.

Witnesses said dozens of al Qaeda members attacked the village, prompting residents to flee and seek help from Iraqi security forces, who sent in police and soldiers.


CNN wrote:

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/11/10/iraq.main/
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- A purported audio recording by the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq vows to step up the group's fight against the United States, saying, "We haven't had enough of your blood yet."

The recording was posted Friday on an Islamist Web site and the speaker is identified as Abu Hamza al-Muhajer, successor to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Al-Muhajer is also known as Abu Ayyub al-Masri.

"Come down to the battlefield, you coward," the speaker says on the recording, which CNN cannot independently confirm as the voice of al-Muhajer.

Calling President Bush a "lame duck" the speaker tells Bush not to "run away as your lame defense secretary ran away," referring to Donald Rumsfeld, who resigned Wednesday.

Critics of the U.S.-led war in Iraq have placed much of the blame for its problems on Rumsfeld. The war's growing unpopularity contributed to toppling the majority Republican Party in both chambers of Congress in Tuesday's election. (Watch Rumsfeld acknowledge what's going wrong -- 2:23)

Much of the Iraqi insurgency has been blamed on al Qaeda in Iraq, whose former chief al-Zarqawi was killed in a U.S.-led airstrike in June.

The speaker on the tape vows that al Qaeda in Iraq will not stop its jihad "until we sit under the olive trees in Rumiya after we blow up the wicked house known as the White House." He says the first phase of the jihad is now over, and that the next phase -- building an Islamic nation -- has begun.

"The victory day has come faster than we expected," he says. "Here is the Islamic nation in Iraq victorious against the tyrant. The enemy is incapable of fighting on and has no choice but to run away."

The speaker claims his al Qaeda army has 12,000 soldiers -- with 10,000 more waiting in the wings to join them.
...


CBS wrote:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/15/iraq/main2479937.shtml
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Feb. 15, 2007
(CBS/AP) The leader of al Qaeda in Iraq was wounded and an aide was killed Thursday in a clash with Iraqi forces north of Baghdad, the Interior Ministry spokesman said.

The clash occurred near Balad, a major U.S. base about 50 miles north of the capital, Brig. Gen Abdul-Karim Khalaf said.

Khalaf said al Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Ayyub al-Masri was wounded and his aide, identified as Abu Abdullah al-Majemaai, was killed.

Khalaf declined to say how Iraqi forces knew al-Masri had been injured, and there was no report on the incident from U.S. authorities. Deputy Interior Minister Maj. Gen. Hussein Ali Kamal said he had no information about such a clash or that al-Masri had been involved.

Al-Masri took over the leadership of al Qaeda in Iraq after its charismatic leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was killed in a U.S. air strike last June in Diyala province northeast of Baghdad.

Meanwhile U.S. and Iraqi forces pushed deeper into Sunni militant strongholds in Baghdad -- where cars rigged with explosives greeted their advance -- while British-led teams in southern Iraq used shipping containers to block suspected weapon smuggling routes from Iran.

The series of car bomb blasts, which killed at least seven civilians, touched all corners of Baghdad. But they did little to disrupt a wide-ranging security sweep seeking to weaken militia groups' ability to fight U.S.-allied forces -- and each other.

The attacks, however, pointed to the critical struggle to gain the upper hand on Baghdad's streets. The Pentagon hopes its current campaign of arrests and arms seizures will convince average Iraqis that militiamen are losing ground.

It will take a lot of convincing.

Iraqis, such as Sunnis living on Haifa Street in central Baghdad, still live in mortal fear, reports CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan.

"Right now it is very difficult with the enemy that is around here in this area -- it is a real hostile area" says Lt. Juan Cantu, whose Crazyhorse Troop is guarding Haifa Street. "These people are scared just to go outside their front door."


Terrorism wrote:

al-Qaeda in Iraq
Al Qaeda in Iraq -- A profile of Sunni jihadist organization Al Qaeda in Iraq
From Amy Zalman, Ph.D.,
Name: Al Qaeda in Iraq

"Al Qaeda in Iraq is a shortening of the organization's original name Tanzim Qaidat Al Jihad fi Bilad Al Rafidin: Organization of Qaidat Al Jihad in the Land of Two Rivers. Iraq is called the land between two rivers, the Euphrates and the Tigris.

There has been considerable speculation about the name of the organization and how it was arrived at.

According to Egyptian journalist Abd Al Rahim Ali, the name "Qaida Al Jihad" is interesting because it reveals the roots of the joint organization formed in 2001 when Al Qaida head Osama bin Laden and Al Jihad of Egypt head Ayman Al Zawahiri joined forces to create "Qaida Al Jihad."

In the view of the U.S. State Department the name is "understood to mean the base of organized jihadist operations in Iraq" (The word "al qaeda" means "base"). This name was given by Jordanian born Abd al Musab Al Zarqawi, who assumed leadership in late 2004, after pledging allegiance to bin Laden.


mnf-iraq wrote:

Iraq Army captures al-Qaeda
IA Captures Al Qaeda In Iraq Cell Leader, Recovers Weapons Cache

BAGHDAD -- Soldiers of the 5th Iraqi Army Division captured a suspected Al Qaeda in
Iraq cell leader during operations Feb. 15 in Muqdadiyah. The suspect is believed
responsible for coordinating and carrying out several improvised explosive device and
rocket attacks targeting Iraqi civilians and Iraqi Security Forces in the area.

During the operation, several munitions caches were recovered by Iraqi Forces.

Munitions confiscated included 12 152mm artillery projectiles, ten 130mm artillery
projectiles, five 105mm artillery projectiles, ten 120mm mortar rounds, 15 82mm mortar
rounds, ten 60mm mortar rounds, 23 anti-tank mines, explosives and detonation cord.

The operation was planned and conducted by 5th IA Division forces. Coalition
Forces accompanied the Iraqi force in an advisory role. Operations caused minimal
damage and there were no Iraqi civilian, Iraqi forces or Coalition Forces casualties.

The operation is another example of the increasing capability of Iraqi Forces to combat violent elements operating within Iraq and Iraqi Forces ability to provide for the safety and security of citizens within Muqdadiyah.


ican711nm wrote:
We are fighting a war. These are the reasons why:

(1) We Americans probably face a sizeable risk of being murdered by Terrorist Malignancy, if we decide to limit the defense of ourselves against Terrorist Malignancy to only here in America;
http://www.mideastweb.org/osambinladen1.htm

(2) The state of Afghanistan harbored (i.e., allowed sanctuary to) al-Qaeda Terrorist Malignancy from May 1996 to October 2001, when the USA invaded Afghanistan seeking to end their sanctuary in Afghanistan;
www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm

(3) The state of Iraq harbored (i.e., allowed sanctuary to) al-Qaeda Terrorist Malignancy from December 2001 to March 2003, when the USA invaded Iraq to end their sanctuary in Iraq;
www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm


Quote:
(4) Tuesday night, September 11, 2001, the President broadcast to the nation:
www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.


Congress wrote:
(5) Friday, September 14, 2001
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/terroristattack/joint-resolution_9-14.html
The President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.


Quote:
(6) Thursday, September 20, 2001, President Bush addressed the nation before a joint session of Congress:
www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
Tonight we are a country awakened to danger. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them.


Quote:
(7) Wednesday, October 16, 2002, Congress passed a joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq and gave two primary and sufficient reasons for doing so, that were subsequently verified by the USA military:

www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf
Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens;



Here is some evidence that al-Qaeda's true intentions are to get Americans to leave Iraq, and follow up our departure with many more 9/11 equivalents or worse.

Quote:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.html
Osama Bin Laden "Declaration of War Against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places"-1996.

I say to you ... These youths [love] death as you love life.
…Those youths know that their rewards in fighting you, the USA, is double than their rewards in fighting some one else not from the people of the book. They have no intention except to enter paradise by killing you. An infidel, and enemy of God like you, cannot be in the same hell with his righteous executioner.

… Few days ago the news agencies had reported that the Defence Secretary of the Crusading Americans had said that "the explosion at Riyadh and Al-Khobar had taught him one lesson: that is not to withdraw when attacked by coward terrorists".

We say to the Defence Secretary that his talk can induce a grieving mother to laughter! and shows the fears that had enshrined you all. Where was this false courage of yours when the explosion in Beirut took place on 1983 AD (1403 A.H). You were turned into scattered pits and pieces at that time; 241 mainly marines solders were killed. And where was this courage of yours when two explosions made you to leave Aden in lees than twenty four hours!

But your most disgraceful case was in Somalia; where- after vigorous propaganda about the power of the USA and its post cold war leadership of the new world order- you moved tens of thousands of international force, including twenty eight thousands American solders into Somalia. However, when tens of your solders were killed in minor battles and one American Pilot was dragged in the streets of Mogadishu you left the area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat and your dead with you. Clinton appeared in front of the whole world threatening and promising revenge , but these threats were merely a preparation for withdrawal. You have been disgraced by Allah and you withdrew; the extent of your impotence and weaknesses became very clear. It was a pleasure for the "heart" of every Muslim and a remedy to the "chests" of believing nations to see you defeated in the three Islamic cities of Beirut , Aden and Mogadishu.

Quote:

http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm
Osama Bin Laden: Text of Fatwah Urging Jihad Against Americans-1998
… On that basis, and in compliance with Allah's order, we issue the following fatwa to all Muslims:
The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies -- civilians and military -- is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque [Mecca] from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty Allah, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah."

Quote:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00035.html
Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols; Translation By JUS; Jun 09, 2004 from the Al-Qaida Organization of the Arab Gulf; 19 Rabbi Al-Akhir 1425
… No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

… Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.


Jordanian journalist, Fouad Hussein in his 2005 book, Al-Zarqawi: al Qaeda's Second Generation, wrote:

Al Qaeda's seven phase plan for world conquest.

Phase 1, the "wakeup call." Spectacular terrorist attacks on the West
(like September 11, 2001) get the infidels (non-Moslems) to make war on
Islamic nations. This arouses Moslems, and causes them to flock to al
Qaedas banner. This phase is considered complete.

Phase 2, the "eye opening." This is the phase we are in, where al Qaeda
does battle with the infidels, and shows over a billion Moslems how
it's done. This phase is supposed to be completed by next year.

Phase 3, "the rising." Millions of aroused (in a terrorist sense)
Moslems go to war against Islam's enemies for the rest of the decade.
Especially heavy attacks are made against Israel. It is believed that
major damage in Israel will force the world to acknowledge al Qaeda as a major power, and negotiate with it.

Phase 4, "the downfall." By 2013, al Qaeda will control the Persian
Gulf, and all its oil, as well as most of the Middle East. This will
enable al Qaeda to cripple the American economy, and American military
power.

Phase 5, "the Caliphate." By 2016, the Caliphate (one government for
all Moslem nations) will be established. At this point, nearly all
Western cultural influences will be eliminated from Islamic nations. The
Caliphate will organize a mighty army for the next phase.

Phase 6, "world conquest." By 2022, the rest of the world will be
conquered by the righteous and unstoppable armies of Islam. This is the
phase that Osama bin Laden has been talking about for years.

Phase 7, "final victory." All the world's inhabitants will be forced to
either convert to Islam, or submit (as second class citizens) to
Islamic rule. This will be completed by 2025 or thereabouts.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 11:54 am
Ican, can't you realize how stupid and f*cking ridiculous the last part you quoted is?

So, AQ is going to unite all the Moslem countries together in just a couple of years. All the rich, capitalistic leaders are going to just up and submit to the will of Bin Laden and let him run the show.

Then, they are going to magically raise up a huge army - from what? Where are they going to get the weapons, tanks, planes? Where do they get ships that can challenge ours on the seas, or fighters to challenge ours in the skies? It's absolutely ridiculous. Anyone who writes such a thing is completely and totally ignorant of the way the world actually works, and apparently has studied nothing of military or Muslim history.

It's not a serious plan. It's like me planning to take over the US through popular uprising, where we will amass a huge army and get military equipment from somewhere, and nobody will try to stop us at all. It's amazing that you buy into this crap.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 11:57 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
So, what has your 10:20 post vs revel's 10:17 post have anything to do with revel's? Nothing.

At 10:32 am this morning, you accused me: "ican, You're ignoring revel's post; why don't you respond?" That was a lie.

You know damn well I wasn't ignoring revel's post just because I posted something else at 10:20 am after her 10:17 am post, before I responded to revel.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 12:08 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Ican, can't you realize how stupid and f*cking ridiculous the last part you quoted is?

So, AQ is going to unite all the Moslem countries together in just a couple of years. All the rich, capitalistic leaders are going to just up and submit to the will of Bin Laden and let him run the show.

Then, they are going to magically raise up a huge army - from what? Where are they going to get the weapons, tanks, planes? Where do they get ships that can challenge ours on the seas, or fighters to challenge ours in the skies? It's absolutely ridiculous. Anyone who writes such a thing is completely and totally ignorant of the way the world actually works, and apparently has studied nothing of military or Muslim history.

It's not a serious plan. It's like me planning to take over the US through popular uprising, where we will amass a huge army and get military equipment from somewhere, and nobody will try to stop us at all. It's amazing that you buy into this crap.

Cycloptichorn

I agree that what al-Qaeda is attempting to do is "stupid and f*cking ridiculous." Actually, I think what al-Qaeda intends to do is insane.

What you so far appear incapable of comprehending or facing, is that they are nonetheless determined to try and do what they say. Because of that, in their failure to succeed to achieve what they want, they will murder millions if we let them. Just like we let the insane Nazis mass murder millions before we finally stopped them from mass murdering more millions.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 12:12 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Ican, can't you realize how stupid and f*cking ridiculous the last part you quoted is?

So, AQ is going to unite all the Moslem countries together in just a couple of years. All the rich, capitalistic leaders are going to just up and submit to the will of Bin Laden and let him run the show.

Then, they are going to magically raise up a huge army - from what? Where are they going to get the weapons, tanks, planes? Where do they get ships that can challenge ours on the seas, or fighters to challenge ours in the skies? It's absolutely ridiculous. Anyone who writes such a thing is completely and totally ignorant of the way the world actually works, and apparently has studied nothing of military or Muslim history.

It's not a serious plan. It's like me planning to take over the US through popular uprising, where we will amass a huge army and get military equipment from somewhere, and nobody will try to stop us at all. It's amazing that you buy into this crap.

Cycloptichorn

I agree that what al-Qaeda is attempting to do is "stupid and f*cking ridiculous." Actually, I think what al-Qaeda intends to do is insane.

What you so far appear incapable of comprehending or facing, is that they are nonetheless determined to try and do what they say. Because of that, in their failure to succeed to achieve what they want, they will murder millions if we let them. Just like we let the insane Nazis mass murder millions before we finally stopped them from mass murdering more millions.


Gigantic difference being, the Nazis had the resources and army to murder millions. AQ does not, and never will; they enjoy no mandate from any group of people to garner their resources and use them for this purpose.

You ignore the fact that Germany had huge amounts of military technology and armies to carry out it's will; AQ has none. The Muslim countries of the world couldn't assemble an army to match the power of the US if the tried for decades.

So, being afraid of their doing so is ridiculous and a terrible way to make foreign policy. What would be better would be to de-legitimize them by minimizing their importance, instead of pumping their importance up. Every time Bush calls them the threat of our generation, they become more so; every time we scoff at them, they become less so.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 01:12 pm
ican wrote :

Quote:
I agree that what al-Qaeda is attempting to do is "stupid and f*cking ridiculous." Actually, I think what al-Qaeda intends to do is insane.


hmmm , interesting turn of events/history .
at one time al-qaeda was considered an important force in chasing the soviets out of afghanistan , but now they are considered one of the greatest - if not THE GREATEST - evils in this the world ?
looks to me like the U.S. made a pact with the devil .
your words : "better dead than red" seem fitting here .
the U.S. preferred to associate with al-qaeda (red) rather than being dead ???
hbg
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 01:13 pm
ican: What you so far appear incapable of comprehending or facing, is that they are nonetheless determined to try and do what they say. Because of that, in their failure to succeed to achieve what they want, they will murder millions if we let them. Just like we let the insane Nazis mass murder millions before we finally stopped them from mass murdering more millions.

ican, You are insane to think AQ is anything like Nazi Germany! Millions? Your imagination is also insane.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 02:44 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Ican, can't you realize how stupid and f*cking ridiculous the last part you quoted is?

So, AQ is going to unite all the Moslem countries together in just a couple of years. All the rich, capitalistic leaders are going to just up and submit to the will of Bin Laden and let him run the show.

Then, they are going to magically raise up a huge army - from what? Where are they going to get the weapons, tanks, planes? Where do they get ships that can challenge ours on the seas, or fighters to challenge ours in the skies? It's absolutely ridiculous. Anyone who writes such a thing is completely and totally ignorant of the way the world actually works, and apparently has studied nothing of military or Muslim history.

It's not a serious plan. It's like me planning to take over the US through popular uprising, where we will amass a huge army and get military equipment from somewhere, and nobody will try to stop us at all. It's amazing that you buy into this crap.

Cycloptichorn

I agree that what al-Qaeda is attempting to do is "stupid and f*cking ridiculous." Actually, I think what al-Qaeda intends to do is insane.

What you so far appear incapable of comprehending or facing, is that they are nonetheless determined to try and do what they say. Because of that, in their failure to succeed to achieve what they want, they will murder millions if we let them. Just like we let the insane Nazis mass murder millions before we finally stopped them from mass murdering more millions.


Gigantic difference being, the Nazis had the resources and army to murder millions. AQ does not, and never will; they enjoy no mandate from any group of people to garner their resources and use them for this purpose.

You ignore the fact that Germany had huge amounts of military technology and armies to carry out it's will; AQ has none. The Muslim countries of the world couldn't assemble an army to match the power of the US if the tried for decades.

Malarkey! The Nazis did not always have control of all those resources. They obtained those resources from people with time and determined effort. Likewise while al-Qaeda does not have the same amount of resources the Nazis eventually had, it is obtaining those resources from people daily. Nonetheless, al-Qaeda has had sufficient access to the resources they currently require to murder hundreds daily, thousands monthly, and tens of thousands yearly. The only thing that is blunting their effort to murder more is a coalition now determined to stop them from growing to a capacity equivalent to or greater than that of the Nazis.

Thankfully, this time we did not wait for al-Qaeda to grow to the level it intends to grow in the middle east, and then try to conquer them after they came after us with more 9/11s more deadly than the first. Had we waited, we would have been guilty of the same mistakes we made in the 1930s and early 40s. The consequences of those mistakes were the subsequent murders of millions, plus our own and our allies' military deaths and casualties also numbering in the millions.


So, being afraid of their doing so is ridiculous and a terrible way to make foreign policy. What would be better would be to de-legitimize them by minimizing their importance, instead of pumping their importance up. Every time Bush calls them the threat of our generation, they become more so; every time we scoff at them, they become less so.

Malarkey! When we previously ignored them, they grew and mass murdered. When we previously gave them token resistance, they grew, mass murdered , and scoffed at us. When we first gave them massive resistance, they continued to grow and threatened to grow more. Now we are giving them not only massive resistance we are giving them smarter resistance. They are now shrinking.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 02:46 pm
Quote:
Yes, the Whitehouse admitted in July those documents were frauds. No, the Whitehouse did not admit that it knew they were frauds at the time the Whitehouse cited those documents. You have not provided any evidence that the Whitehouse did know those documents were frauds at the time the Whitehouse cited those documents.


I refer you to this Chairman Waxman on the 16 Words They should have known, I suggest they did know and are simply lying about not knowing. It is not credible that they would not know.

As for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi; he was not AQ before the invasion and only styled himself and joined himself to AQ after the invasion in 2004. Once again he was in the part of the Iraq under our own control. Saddam even tried to get rid of him so he was not harboring him. Bush chose not to get rid of him because it would have messed up his case for war. There was no corabitive relationship between Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and saddam hussien before the invasion.

Profile: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist mastermind

Iraq's Alleged Al-Qaeda Ties Were Disputed Before War

Now there is a few AQ in Iraq; however, they are a small number. Most of the insurgents are disgruntled Sunnis. It is the Sunis and Shiites who are fighting. Plus the Kurds. They are the main worry in Iraq at the present time. Save yourself the typing because I know your response and I disagree.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 03:04 pm
hamburger wrote:
ican wrote :

Quote:
I agree that what al-Qaeda is attempting to do is "stupid and f*cking ridiculous." Actually, I think what al-Qaeda intends to do is insane.


hmmm , interesting turn of events/history .
at one time al-qaeda was considered an important force in chasing the soviets out of afghanistan , but now they are considered one of the greatest - if not THE GREATEST - evils in this the world ?
looks to me like the U.S. made a pact with the devil .
your words : "better dead than red" seem fitting here .
the U.S. preferred to associate with al-qaeda (red) rather than being dead ???
hbg

In April 1988, the Soviets began to withdraw fom Afghanistan. We were among those who aided the Soviet defeat by the so-called Afghan jihad. Members of the Afghan jihad then formed al-Qaeda. We failed to take them seriously as a threat until 1996. But even then our resistance was pathetically inadequate. We then muddled along until they did us much more damage in 9/11/2001. Then and only then did we finally begin to escalate our resistance to them.

Al-Qaeda is not the greatest nor even one of the greatest evils in the world. Stupidity is the greatest evil in the world.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/06/2025 at 04:04:04