In the other thread which has been mentioned, i posted a link to an excellent site which is concerned with dog bite law (in the United States). It is maintained by a lawyer in Los Angeles:
Dog Bite Law-dot-com
From his statistics page:
Quote:There is a dog bite epidemic in the United States. There are almost 5 million victims annually -- about 2% of the entire population. 800,000 need medical attention. 1,000 per day need treatment in hospital emergency rooms. Between 15 and 20 die per year. Most of the victims who receive medical attention are children, half of whom are bitten in the face. Dog bite losses exceed $1 billion per year, with over $300 million paid by insurance.
Mr. Phillips makes the point that pit bulls and rottweilers are responsible for dog bite homicides overwhelmingly, but points out this creates a false impression about the efficacy of laws which ban pit bulls and/or rottweilers. He states that dog bite homicides have remained stable at about 15 to 20 per year, but that all reported dog bite incidents are increasing--he says 5,000,000 per year in the United States. It is a rather long passage, so you can read it at
the dog bite homicide section.
Miss Wabbit may find this report interesting:
A study of dog attacks in Adelaide, Australia.
Finally, Mr. Phillips makes the point that legislation which only focuses on pit bulls and rottweilers ignores a growing dog bite epidemic:
Quote:In all fairness, therefore, it must be noted that:
* Any dog, treated harshly or trained to attack, may bite a person. Any dog can be turned into a dangerous dog. The owner or handler most often is responsible for making a dog into something dangerous.
* An irresponsible owner or dog handler might create a situation that places another person in danger by a dog, without the dog itself being dangerous, as in the case of the Pomeranian that killed the infant (see above).
* Any individual dog may be a good, loving pet, even though its breed is considered to be potentially dangerous. A responsible owner can win the love and respect of a dog, no matter its breed. One cannot look at an individual dog, recognize its breed, and then state whether or not it is going to attack.
A caveat: the site i have linked serves to a large extent as a promotion for Mr. Phillips. However, he lists the sources of his statistics, and links them, and provides a good deal of linked information on this topic.