Mary With Child

How many here applauded Rosie O'Donnels' wife having a child?
Will their child be in dire straits because they're a gay couple?

Obviously, Ms Crouse feels that children of Lesbian couples are somehow stigmatized.
You are not aware of the Bush's administrations opposition to LGBT rights such as Marriage Equality?

Roxxxanne wrote:

Butrflynet wrote:

Roxxxanne wrote:

From the article I posted:

"Not only is she doing a disservice to her child, she's voiding all the effort her father put into the Bush administration," said Janice Shaw Crouse, senior fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, the think tank run by Concerned Women for America.

[/b]

Obviously, Ms Crouse feels that children of Lesbian couples are somehow stigmatized.

Quote:

You are not aware of the Bush's administrations opposition to LGBT rights such as Marriage Equality?

If that is the case, it is a very poorly written article. It just leaves the reader to make assumptions about what they think she implies with her vague comment. No, it isn't obvious.

And yes, I'm aware of the marriage rights legislative effort.

It was obvoius to me (but you will notice I edited that post) but I am politically astute and an LGBT Rights Activist.

(I hope you are not going to ask what LGBT stands for)

I don't believe evidence is required to offer an opinion.

It was obvoius to me (but you will notice I edited that post) but I am politically astute and an LGBT Rights Activist.

(I hope you are not going to ask what LGBT stands for)

LoneStarMadam wrote:

I don't believe evidence is required to offer an opinion.

No, it's just required to offer an informed opinion.

Quote:

It was obvoius to me (but you will notice I edited that post) but I am politically astute and an LGBT Rights Activist.

(I hope you are not going to ask what LGBT stands for)

Are you saying that you edited the article before posting it but didn't state that it was an excerpt and not the entire article?

No wonder it has so many non-sequitirs.

The question that still hasn't been answered is whether this baby is going to be able to have two parents or not?

blatham wrote:

OK guys. I think it's time to stop piling on here. MSM has ceased posting in the manner we all protested. Not everyone manages to accomplish such a change and that really ought not to go unnoticed or unrewarded.

Thanks, but I doubt your words will mean much to some that would find fault with anything that any conservative says, which is fine, it's their right, it's my right to keep on standing for what I believe.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

blatham wrote:

OK guys. I think it's time to stop piling on here. MSM has ceased posting in the manner we all protested. Not everyone manages to accomplish such a change and that really ought not to go unnoticed or unrewarded.

Thanks, but I doubt your words will mean much to some that would find fault with anything that any conservative says, which is fine, it's their right, it's my right to keep on standing for what I believe.

You deserved the pat on the back.

A fundamental reason you keep getting in trouble here is for sentences such as I noted in red. That's an exaggeration and it doesn't apply to anyone on the site. It's inaccurate and uncareful. You'll get jumped on for that, as you should. At our best here, we are a demanding group (though most, including me, could be more civil more often) and the reason for that is to try and get our facts and our thinking right.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

I don't believe evidence is required to offer an opinion.

There is no requirement that my opinion need agree with your opinion, which is what you are doing, in my opinion.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

blatham wrote:

OK guys. I think it's time to stop piling on here. MSM has ceased posting in the manner we all protested. Not everyone manages to accomplish such a change and that really ought not to go unnoticed or unrewarded.

Thanks, but I doubt your words will mean much to some that would find fault with anything that any conservative says, which is fine, it's their right, it's my right to keep on standing for what I believe.

You deserved the pat on the back.

A fundamental reason you keep getting in trouble here is for sentences such as I noted in red. That's an exaggeration and it doesn't apply to anyone on the site. It's inaccurate and uncareful. You'll get jumped on for that, as you should. At our best here, we are a demanding group (though most, including me, could be more civil more often) and the reason for that is to try and get our facts and our thinking right.