Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:22 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Quote:

I do support the baby.


But isn't supporting babies a form of socialism?


old europe wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
old europe wrote:
Well, I don't know what the fuss is about.

LSM has come out in favour of Lesbian rights. She supports the right of a lesbian couple to have a child together.

No big deal.

I support the right of the baby, I could care less what lesbians do.


Ah, but what if it was two illegal lesbians?


heeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheehee . . .

You boys is crackin' me up . . .
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:23 pm
All them gay folk were babies in their early days. What happened to supporting their rights? Do their rights still exist now that the baby is all grown up?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:44 pm
A little nod to LSM...the thread title is funny.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:45 pm
LoneStarMadam wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
then you support homosexuals cohabitating, right?

I could care less what they do, they want to sleep with their daddy, nothing to me.


Shocked Shocked Shocked

LoneStarMadam supports NAMBLA!!!
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:47 pm
and GIRLBLA.....
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:47 pm
squinney wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
then you support homosexuals cohabitating, right?

I could care less what they do, they want to sleep with their daddy, nothing to me.


Shocked Shocked Shocked

LoneStarMadam supports NAMBLA!!!


OMFG . . . LSM is a friend of Nancy Pelosi ! ! !
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:56 pm
Setanta wrote:
I could care less what they do, they want to sleep with their daddy, nothing to me.


Oh, I dunno. As long as her baby isn't from her da......

Wait!

LSM: would you support the baby if it was from her daddy?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:57 pm
Uhm . . . why are you attributing LSM's drivel to me?

I ain't never been that drunk . . .
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:01 pm
Wait..... I have to change my sig line.

Here.

What did you say, Set?

(Damn, this Bordeaux is good....)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:04 pm
You ain'ta foolin' nobody, Boy . . . i'm keepin' an eye on you from now on . . .
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:08 pm
Setanta wrote:
You ain'ta foolin' nobody, Boy . . . i'm keepin' an eye on you from now on . . .


Seeing this on the same page where NAMBLA has been mentioned gives me a somewhat uncomfortable feeling....
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:10 pm
Damned straight . . . i knowed you was one a them NAMBLA boys the first time i seen ya . . .
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:11 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Quote:

I do support the baby.


But isn't supporting babies a form of socialism?

Another name for supporting babies IMO, is pro-life.

& to clear up another misunderstanding, I support any mother delivering a baby, rather than having it killed. Do I believe that a homosexual couple is an ideal situtation to raise a child in? No, but neither are drug addicted straight couples either. However, having the baby rather than having it killed, the baby at least has a fighting chance.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:12 pm
old europe wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
old europe wrote:
Well, I don't know what the fuss is about.

LSM has come out in favour of Lesbian rights. She supports the right of a lesbian couple to have a child together.

No big deal.

I support the right of the baby, I could care less what lesbians do.


Ah, but what if it was two illegal lesbians?

The baby hasn't done anything wrong.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:13 pm
I think NAMBLA has received more press since LSM joined than at anytime in it's history..... now that I know she supports babies being left in the care of homosexuals I understand her nefarious plan.... she's a vicious left wing plant in disguise. I feel so duped.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:13 pm
old europe wrote:
Or two African-American lesbians?

Or yellow or red or brown or white, the baby is innocent.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:14 pm
LoneStarMadam wrote:
old europe wrote:
Or two African-American lesbians?

Or yellow or red or brown or white, the baby is innocent.


Didn't you say something about being a Catholic a while back? Laughing

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:14 pm
old europe wrote:
Or two gay lesb......


....



Nevermind.

Is there another type of lesb...... ?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:15 pm
<LSM>
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:15 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
All them gay folk were babies in their early days. What happened to supporting their rights? Do their rights still exist now that the baby is all grown up?

Of course they have rights, who sid they don't?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Mary With Child
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/17/2021 at 09:08:06