hamburger wrote:ebrown_p wrote:
"Right now men don't have many choice (or rights) when it comes to reproduction. "
are they being coerced :wink: ?
hbg
A pregnancy takes the involvement of two people-- a man and a woman. Assuming neither of them is coerced, they should have equal rights and equal responsibilities.
In this case the man and the woman made a decision to have a physical relationship. The pregnancy is their equal responsibility.
- The woman claimed she was using the pill. She may have lied about this (or been irresponsible) meaning the man was forced to reproduce under a pretext. Women aren't tricked into reproducing against their will (since they always have an option to not be a parent, even after being irresponsible enough to start an unwanted pregnancy).
- The woman gets the sole decision about whether to terminate the pregnancy. If she wants to terminate the pregnancy for any reason (i.e. she doesn't want the expense or responsiblity) no one can defy her. In this case she goes on with her life with no long term economic consequences.
- The man has no such ability. If he wants to terminate the pregancy for any reason, he can't. The woman can decide whether she wants the expense inherent in parenting. The man has no such choice and is stuck with 18 years of expenses even if his choice was to terminate the pregnancy.
Many people are willing to say that the man made his choice when he had sex and shouldn't complain if he is forced to become a parent.
Would you be willing to say that the woman made her choice when she had sex and shouldn't complain if she is forced to have the baby?