Ut Oh, Could Nancy Be Facing....

I think Lil Bit is smart enough to realize I was speaking about decorum not opinions.

And my comment wasn't restricted to specific people. There's been a lot of mud slinging from all directions.

Butrflynet wrote:

I think Lil Bit is smart enough to realize I was speaking about decorum not opinions.

And my comment wasn't restricted to specific people. There's been a lot of mud slinging from all directions.

not directed to specific people?
Who then were you talking about when you said LSM & MC in that we all came in together?

LittleBitty wrote:

I don't believe that I'm deserving of the treatment I've received regardless of the length of time I've been here. My posts have not been personal attacks. I've seen and ignored many comments, some calling me a troll, some calling me other posters, and in general, there's been behavior I'd be ashamed of if I were a veteran. I'm quite certain that I would receive more mutual respect in a coffee shop or sewing circle if only I knew how to sew.

On this point, I'll agree with you! It is too bad you happened to come through the door at the same time as the other two in the posse. Must be that collateral damage and guilt by association thing everyone here is gnawing on. Imagine what it would be like if you were a public figure or politician. No wonder this is the quality of character we have running for public office.

I'm sorry you've been tarnished by it. It would be great if people (this means all stripes and flavors of people) could put forth an opinion without coming away feeling like they'd been mangled and discarded. A lot more people would become involved in the political discussions here again.

I invite you to step into some of the other categories of discussion here. I've seen you in the Marlboro one and know you'd be a welcome participant in a lot of others.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Butrflynet wrote:

I think Lil Bit is smart enough to realize I was speaking about decorum not opinions.

And my comment wasn't restricted to specific people. There's been a lot of mud slinging from all directions.

not directed to specific people?
Who then were you talking about when you said LSM & MC in that we all came in together?

Odd - I don't seem to be able to find anything of the sort from Butrflynet - if not too much bother, would you be so good as to provide a link, please?

Butrflynet is not a he. Timber pointed out that Butrflynet did not make the comment you claimed she did. You haven't shown by quoting Butrflynet that she wrote what you claim, so Timber's comment is appropriate. You're just wildly slinging charges around.

Butrflynet is not a he. Timber pointed out that Butrflynet did not make the comment you claimed she did. You haven't shown by quoting Butrflynet that she wrote what you claim, so Timber's comment is appropriate. You're just wildly slinging charges around.

Setanta wrote:

Butrflynet is not a he. Timber pointed out that Butrflynet did not make the comment you claimed she did. You haven't shown by quoting Butrflynet that she wrote what you claim, so Timber's comment is appropriate. You're just wildly slinging charges around.

It's kind of perfect pattern, really.


LSM repeats invented slurs against one person, and invents slurs against herself from others.


I am surprised, however, that one who is prepared to baselessly accuse a person of supporting paedophilia, of all things, should be so sensitive about much lesser insults made (or not made) against herself.

dlowan wrote:

Setanta wrote:

Butrflynet is not a he. Timber pointed out that Butrflynet did not make the comment you claimed she did. You haven't shown by quoting Butrflynet that she wrote what you claim, so Timber's comment is appropriate. You're just wildly slinging charges around.

It's kind of perfect pattern, really.


LSM repeats invented slurs against one person, and invents slurs against herself from others.


I am surprised, however, that one who is prepared to baselessly accuse a person of supporting paedophilia, of all things, should be so sensitive about much lesser insults made (or not made) against herself.

I haven't accused you of anything, (unlike you that offers nothing but personal attacks & lies of any that you disagree with) i have accused a public figure of many things, i still accuse Pelosi of defending NAMBLA because of her silence.

LoneStarMadam wrote:

dlowan wrote:

Setanta wrote:

Butrflynet is not a he. Timber pointed out that Butrflynet did not make the comment you claimed she did. You haven't shown by quoting Butrflynet that she wrote what you claim, so Timber's comment is appropriate. You're just wildly slinging charges around.

It's kind of perfect pattern, really.


LSM repeats invented slurs against one person, and invents slurs against herself from others.


I am surprised, however, that one who is prepared to baselessly accuse a person of supporting paedophilia, of all things, should be so sensitive about much lesser insults made (or not made) against herself.

I haven't accused you of anything, (unlike you that offers nothing but personal attacks & lies of any that you disagree with) i have accused a public figure of many things, i still accuse Pelosi of defending NAMBLA because of her silence.

And you're still full of it.

By and large, interaction among members here at A2K is not characterized by rancor and unpleasantness. One is called to wonder why interactions involving LSM typically are not characteristic of this website's overall tenor.

By and large, interaction among members here at A2K is not characterized by rancor and unpleasantness. One is called to wonder why interactions involving LSM typically are not characteristic of this website's overall tenor.

timberlandko wrote:

By and large, interaction among members here at A2K is not characterized by rancor and unpleasantness. One is called to wonder why interactions involving LSM typically are not characteristic of this website's overall tenor.

It's not that great a mystery, actually.

kickycan wrote:

timberlandko wrote:

By and large, interaction among members here at A2K is not characterized by rancor and unpleasantness. One is called to wonder why interactions involving LSM typically are not characteristic of this website's overall tenor.

It's not that great a mystery, actually.

say what you mean please kicky.... when you speak so mysteriously I just feel soooo inadequate....

dlowan wrote:

LoneStarMadam wrote:

dlowan wrote:

Setanta wrote:

Butrflynet is not a he. Timber pointed out that Butrflynet did not make the comment you claimed she did. You haven't shown by quoting Butrflynet that she wrote what you claim, so Timber's comment is appropriate. You're just wildly slinging charges around.

It's kind of perfect pattern, really.


LSM repeats invented slurs against one person, and invents slurs against herself from others.


I am surprised, however, that one who is prepared to baselessly accuse a person of supporting paedophilia, of all things, should be so sensitive about much lesser insults made (or not made) against herself.

I haven't accused you of anything, (unlike you that offers nothing but personal attacks & lies of any that you disagree with) i have accused a public figure of many things, i still accuse Pelosi of defending NAMBLA because of her silence.

And you're still full of it.

Wonderful retort.
LMAO, you may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but you are certainly a good avenue for laughs.

As a follow-up to Timber. I woulda ask you LSM "what do you get out of posting on a2k?" Most of us see this forum as a type of community and, for sure, we have had posters that seem intent of only disrupting rather than debating or providing information.

If you find vitriol to be the norm here, one can only speculate on the reasons you continue to produce such a large volume of posts here everyday. My guess is you enjoy attention, even if mostly negative, or that you enjoy feeling as if you're yanking people's chains. In any case, congratulations for generating and receiving more flame posts in a shorter time than I've seen in my years here. You must be one world class assh*le.

As a follow-up to Timber. I woulda ask you LSM "what do you get out of posting on a2k?" Most of us see this forum as a type of community and, for sure, we have had posters that seem intent of only disrupting rather than debating or providing information.